3 pointsby derwiki7 hours ago12 comments
  • cyanregiment31 minutes ago
    • 996 schedule

    • Ads all over SF that just have our logo with no context

    • Hacker house in Pac Heights

    • Shared space in Hayes (for calls)

    • Tech stack is Next.js/React/OPENAI_API_KEY

    • Product is AI SOC-2 verification

    • The company will fail, I'll pivot into real estate

  • magicalhippoan hour ago
    As an employee hell no. I've done a couple of crunches, but efficiency tanks. Plan better, be more agile, solve the immediate issues rather than getting fancy, so much one can do instead.
  • dgunayan hour ago
    No, but if I got paid overtime I'd absolutely do it (or something more reasonable like 50-60 hrs/week)
  • JohnFen7 hours ago
    You couldn't pay me enough to sacrifice so much of my life for someone else's business.
    • chistev3 hours ago
      What if you were in dire straits and needed the money?
    • tossitawayplz6 hours ago
      But, think of the shareholders!
      • 6 hours ago
        undefined
  • nicbou2 hours ago
    996 hours a year? Sure.

    I wasn't put on Earth to create shareholder value. Work is the means to an end. The less of it I have to do, the better.

  • AFF876 hours ago
    No. I can understand doing so if it's your own company and you have a significant % of the business. But if you are an employee it does not make sense, you will not gain the time back
  • kermatt5 hours ago
    I'm not getting paid by the hour, so hell no.

    If I was paid hourly, hell no.

  • root-parent5 hours ago
    Yes, I do 996 hours per year. That is exactly 83 hours per month, and as a prime, management can’t divide it any further.
  • marssaxman6 hours ago
    I did that and more when I was trying to get my startup off the ground, but never since and never again.
  • spottedmarley6 hours ago
    what is this 'work' you speak of?
  • colesantiago7 hours ago
    No.

    But my agents are.

  • tobias-lindenba6 hours ago
    [dead]