Oh, they don't have permission? probably fine then.
If they're found to have held onto it, processed it or shared it, they'll be told off very sternly and asked politely to not do it again.
All the Palantir employees have read that clause of course.
In Australia when the biggest health insurer had ALL patient records stolen, the Board of Directors immediately granted themselves very large cash bonuses (true).
I realized this by talking to several recently hired graduates at several startups. I was shocked at the amount of startups spending money on Palantir. It seems right now, every dumb founder with no idea or market fit, and a lot of dumb money is buying their tools.
There is a spending AI bubble, and then there is a parallel mini Palantir buy bubble...
[1] https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v48/n13/peter-geoghegan-and-...
This is worrying as there recently was a change in the Japanese PII law, relatively unceremoniously passed and enacted, that reclassify mass PII collection including medical data collection as anonymous and consent-free with the condition that anonymization is performed after collection, which, IMO, IANAL, completely nullify the PII law. I can easily "see" Palantir behind it with my tinfoil hat on, but I'm not sure why do anyone want it in the first place. I don't think they need medical data specifically to take people to the back and dispose of the body.
Daddy Thiel needs a bloodbank. The last one mysteriously died under the guise of a 'suicide'.
https://www.inc.com/jeff-bercovici/peter-thiel-young-blood.h...
Honestly every single time there is news about UK, I am glad I didn't take the offer.
Then again, me being already not very enthusiastic about the place had a role in my decision.
You claim to be in Sweden, then you should surely know that Palantir are very much in bed with the government there including police monitoring.
I literally had someone ask me the other day if it's safe to go to London. Like, to visit as a tourist. We've reached some level of absurdity that is almost comedic, but that's what news does to people.
Yeah, that shouldn't have happened and courts have generally agreed that it was a police overreach. But I can assure you that you can go around london protesting the King with whatever banner you want and you won't get arrested - in fact people do daily with no consequences.
And don't get me wrong - some of the laws around this are insane. But flattening the entire country to focus on one issue is like...not exactly fair? It's like me saying I won't ever move to Sweden because your public sector employees are required to report suspected illegal immigrants(even UK doesn't go that far!).
The "oh I won't take a job in the UK because someone got arrested protesting the king" is a stance, for sure - I just don't know if any country in the world would meet your high moral standard.