Also, I'm not seeing how "AI" gets itself so deep into some new 9/11-ish event. The old 9/11 involved >75% Saudi nationals, 4 jet airplanes, and 2 skyscrapers - the all specific choices by the attackers. Except where it suited the government's interests - creepy machismo security for airline passengers - zero of those things became foci of major & ongoing government attention after the attack.
I think there is a lot, and I mean a LOT, of overlooked potential data here. I frequently say the same thing in a different context, eg we have the NSA, which has no impeccable track record of strictly adhering to law, yet parallel, we have extremely sophisticated narco operations running smoothly throughout America, just to name one example. Geo fencing, dozens of other, some not-even-named, technologies, and yet, corruption prevails.
And that is partly why, I worry. Was there foresight for 911? No point in answering that here. Can something bad happen despite seeing it coming? No point in answering that here.
But there is more to your comment than I think you are giving it credit for. A lot more.
You can log me for a 'big event' forecast. I think one would have to have a faith exceeding the wildest religion to expect otherwise.
It will be EXTREMELY import (critical in the strongest sense) going forward, however, to remain acutely aware of censorship and manipulation masquerading as safety.
Edit: I should add, since we are in prediction territory: Expect a lot of pressure coming down on Open Source (and compute in general). No need to bash me for saying it -- just have patience.