7 pointsby wjSgoWPm5bWAhXB4 hours ago2 comments
  • u1hcw9nx4 hours ago
    ... in mice.

    More than 90% of "in mice" studies do not transfer to humans.

    • Aaargh203183 hours ago
      I wonder how often a medicine that would have worked in humans doesn't transfer to mice, resulting in it being rejected.
      • tusimi3 hours ago
        all the time. lack of appropriate/translatable preclinical models is one of the largest barriers to new meds. in practice, if you can't find a mouse that has the same disease its almost impossible to prove your cure works,, even if it would in humans
  • joemazerino3 hours ago
    A study from a Chinese lab referring to Western diets as toxic and a cause of depression?
    • cestith2 hours ago
      A Western diet is a transferable thing. Just like in the US we hear about the benefits of the Mediterranean diet or the lower rates of some diseases in Scandinavia or Japan. China has had KFC since 1987. Korean restaurants often have Katsu. Japan has Kobe beef and steakhouses. It’s not some nationalistic plot to say that certain regional diets or their influences on a population are beneficial or harmful in various ways.
    • zug_zug2 hours ago
      I think given that 75% of americans are overweight and 40% is obese, certainly food would be a very reasonable first hypothesis of any neutral, objective scientist. I would be surprised if food you ate didn't affect energy levels, feelings of wellbeing, etc.
    • Lalabadie3 hours ago
      I don't think you need to go to China to find that people think the average north American eats terribly for their health.
    • throawayonthe44 minutes ago
      the term western dietary patterns has a more specific meaning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_pattern_diet