18 pointsby healsdata4 hours ago4 comments
  • Ukv2 hours ago
    Private as in chats for which the user generated a share link and posted it somewhere online that a search engine's web crawler found, as far as I can tell.
    • johntash21 minutes ago
      yeah, it seems confusing that people expected public share links to.. not be public?
  • autoexecan hour ago
    Google is a lot more public than it should be, but there's nothing private about chats with Claude or any other chatbot that isn't running locally. It's funny that last year Anthropic tried to say that robots.txt was enough to protect people's data when they themselves have been accused of ignoring it whenever they want to scrape websites. https://www.businessinsider.com/openai-anthropic-ai-ignore-r...
  • mock-possum15 minutes ago
    Ugh >_<

    Clickbait / misleading title - these aren’t private chats:

    > says an Anthropic spokesperson, “These shareable links are not guessable or discoverable unless people choose to share them themselves. When someone shares a conversation, they are making that content publicly accessible, and like other public web content, it may be archived by third-party services.”

    These are publicly shared convos, turning up in search engine results - just like every other publicly available content the search engine had crawled/indexed.

    This is the system working as intended / expected

    • zzleeper12 minutes ago
      Does Chrome use URLs you click on to help its indexer? EG if someone sends you a link to www.example.com/mysecretpage and somehow it appears in Google later.

      That might be a case where what you expect is private is leaked by the browser

  • summarybot2 hours ago
    Relying on search engines to "follow the rules" is the wrong approach.