Going back to the subject: Have you ever been clinically depressed or dealt with people in that predicament? Getting up from the bed is already a huge win for that day, let alone exercising and doing it consistently and regularly. Even taking medication regularly can be a hit or miss.
So, yeah the prescription is easy to write and thank god it's real and effective, but that's only ~5% of the work.
Would a personal trainer or paid or not training buddy or something of the sort help your motivation?
But, again, everyone's experiences are different.
See also: "Why don't more people with ADHD get treatment?" "Because if they were able to initiate and follow through a complex plan of meeting with care providers, arguing with insurance, and having prescriptions filled, they probably wouldn't need it."
I finally get a medication to try, and on the way home it falls out of my pocket. Don’t realize till I’m home and go back and find it… smashed in the street, run over by a car. Lol. So yeah, it’s a real struggle.
There's a reason I pick up my refills exactly on time, even if I still have some of the old prescription left. That little overlapping buffer gives me great peace of mind.
My exercise volume varies throughout the year because of physical health concerns (sickness, injury, combination of the two), and I notice it and will become mopey, but it's far from the crippling anxiety and depression that sets in if I miss my SSRIs for a few days.
But this is just anecdata, treat accordingly.
Severe depression, absolutely. That's also discussed in the article.
You can be sold exercise too. Physical therapy exists. Personal trainers exist. Gym memberships, gym influencers, gym culture, and gym products all exist. It's not the inability to sell you a product that stops people from exercising.
It's in the article. How doctors actually recommend it (the complaint of many patients that they are only told, or only hear, "exercise more") versus how medical treatments usually provide plans and guidance. Telling people to exercise more (mostly) doesn't help (especially for people already dealing with reduced motivation from a disorder like depression). Clear, actionable guidance, possibly with a monitored program, that's something patients have more chance of following through on.
All that to say, I think IMO exercise can help improve general daily mood, but it did not really do anything for my overall depression.
I spent a while reading a bunch of papers on it. First of all, keto lowers inflammation. Inflammation harms cognitive function, especially executive function. Also, a bunch of neurological disorders are associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, and keto acts as a "backup" metabolic pathway. (i.e. if your glucose engine is "misfiring", you can burn fat instead, and in some cases that makes the problem go away.)
The trick is adherence. Carbs are very addictive! I was never able to make the diet stick. (Turns out bread is very tasty...)
But from all I've read, it seems like it would help with a bunch of issues I have. So I thought it would be worth mentioning here, in case it helps someone.
Every checkup for me has started with "what is you diet and exercise like?"
I joked to her that puppies beat SSRIs any day of the week, that she should write prescriptions to take to the animal shelter. And it's probably true! Unfortunately, I don't live the kind of life that's compatible with a pet.
Personally, I'm grateful that doctors mostly stay in their lane, although I would hope a good therapist might recommend physical activity to someone who needs it.
And as to what kind of exercise to recommend -- the advice I've heard is that the best kind of exercise to do is what you enjoy and will therefore stick to. Brisk walking three times a week for 20-30 minutes might work great for some people. But if someone finds that a tedious chore, they're probably not going to stick to it.
When people talk about exercise as a treatment for depression, i never imagined they meant such small amounts.
2. People with depression often have careers they care about and families they need to support. Even if leaving their lives behind worked, they wouldn't want to do that for the same reason you wouldn't.
That's not super meaningful though. Just because a specific lifestyle doesn't affect every person doesn't mean it doesn't effect some people.
Like you could probably also say for every smoker with lung cancer there is a smoker who didn't develop lung cancer (since risk is only 15% so the majority dont). But smoking is still terrible for you.
> People with depression often have careers they care about and families they need to support. Even if leaving their lives behind worked, they wouldn't want to do that for the same reason you wouldn't.
Depends on what severity of depression we are talking, but there is a very real way that depressed people do leave their families and lives behind by the very nature of the disease.
If studies showed that African women who walk miles and miles collecting water somehow are less depressed than women with local water, I'll be more sold that exercise does something special..
If only doctors could prescribe it and have people adhere to the prescription.
If only American culture weren't so car-centric and our daily lives involved some natural amount of exercising. We've built a society where only the privileged few can walk or bike to work. It's just too easy these days to barely move in our normal life. Drive to work, drive to the store, drive the kids places... you literally have to specifically schedule exercise (and ironically, many people will drive to the gym to walk on a treadmill).
Skip the elevator and take the stairs.
Park at the far end of the parking lot, not next to the door.
When I run errands, I park at a central location and walk to the various destinations.
When I meet a friend or associate, instead of meeting at a restaurant, I propose meeting at a nice area and have a walk & talk.
It adds up.
I heard the practice referred to recently as "Outrunning the darkness", which is glib but kinda describes why I am typically either at work, caring for my kids, or out on a bike.
That said, I very much sympathise be all the accounts by people for whom days are made palatable, and exercise is made possible, by taking prescription medication.
I get where he's coming from, but at the same time, if we can achieve even roughly the same result with exercise as with medication, that's a ridiculously huge win. Side effects of antidepressants are usually uncountably many, whereas for exercise it's (just) injuries and it's pretty well understood how to prevent them. Granted depression is a thousand different diseases in a trench coat, but even if we can ameliorate some forms with exercise, that would still make it considerably more available and approachable.
Exercise doesn't need to be complex or intimidating. Starting out with going for a short walk counts as exercise. You could even do it while you have the patient with you on an appointment, go walk out and about with them. Depression is a complex beast and the more tricks we have up our sleeves to fight it, the better.
If you're depressed, trying to make exercise happen can be the hardest thing in the world for some. But for those that it isn't, it could help a lot.
Also, when fat people eat less they lose weight.
As with any intervention, the devil is in the details. The author doesn't really provide any.
If the fix was easy we wouldn't need doctors to provide it.
> So why isn’t it treated like real medicine?
Because exercise is free, pills are not.If you want to prescribe exercise for someone with this level of depression, you need to prescribe someone to remove the barriers to exercise.
It's true that there's some people who can't exercise, and we should have sympathy for them.
Alternatively, I smell a business opportunity, as I know some people that deserve depression and misery, and "pay me to dance near them" could be a thing.
Yeah, true.
> They'll get over it.
Has not been my experience.
> You'll also get better.
Ditto.
I am not gifted at music but my affinity for it and ability to play music is above-average (not hard, most people just don't ever even try) but if I try to dance, somehow where I think each movement should start or end is entirely wrong, like, to such a degree that it's like I'm trying and wonderfully succeeding at doing it wrong.
Somehow, even with the objective criteria of sensors ensuring I am indeed hitting things when I should be, I can even get pretty damn good at something like Dance Dance Revolution, and feel like I'm moving naturally and smoothly while playing it, yet apparently look like I'm having a seizure even as I'm landing "perfects" across the board.
That's how constitutionally incapable of dance (or, if you prefer, how "white") I am.
As for being untalented, all that means is it will take you more time to get good at it.
P.S. What you think you are doing while dancing is not what you are actually doing. That's why a coach is necessary.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBsjhpphowI - 18:20 and on.
Simply saying "exercise more" to someone struggling with mental health is like telling a person who is bleeding to death that they should stop bleeding. Yeah, chances are they really want to, but they don't have control over it in the moment.
And this article is about not saying that, but giving them actionable guidance and (possibly) referring them to programs that can help (like how you might be referred to a nutritionist by your doctor instead of just being told to "eat better").
Maybe we could use flock cameras to enforce prescriptions for walking on the sidewalks.
Like eyeglasses for near-sighted people. Obviously prescriptions should never be needed for far-sighted people. Only for near-sighted people.
You know, for your safety.
Clinical depression is a serious mental illness, it causes great suffering, broken relationships, and far too frequently, death by suicide.
A person suffering to such an extent frequently will seek treatment (if they don't, well we don't generally pursue people with medical conditions) from a trained, licensed professional for evaluation, and the extent to which the patient gets out of the house and interacts with people is part of the assessment. Exercise will be among the suggestions that will be encouraged.
However, you don't need a prescription to exercise, so it's not treated like medicine, but it is recommended. If you are prescribed medication or exercise, if you don't take it or do it, there generally isn't a compliance system that kicks in (unless the courts have become involved)
In any case, I'm not exactly up to date on the state of the art in terms of standard of care, but as far as I understood the role of a psychiatrist, it is specifically to write prescriptions. Exercise is not a controlled substance. You don't need a prescription to do it. Any doctor or even just a clinical therapist, counselor, anyone with a license to listen to you and make recommendations, can recommend exercise. And I'm sure they do. If you make it to a psychiatrist, it's because the less controlled options didn't do the trick.
It's exactly the same thing here: exercise is not a "cure" for depression, it is a treatment plan that has good odds of success if stuck to, and it is frequently not stuck to. Turns out that depressed people are even less likely than the median person to stick to an exercise plan, and the median person is already pretty fucking bad. So the field gravitates to treatments which are achievable even if imperfect.
The article goes into this not at all, it just closes with some blather about supervised programs and gym access, which is like yelling louder at a fat person to "eat less, dammit!". Good luck with that treatment, I'll take the drugs which work.
I had taken up jogging before, but never stuck with it for very long.
I had an operation a couple years ago, and the surgeon told me I could not jog for six weeks. It was hard to wait that long :-)
Could you elaborate? I have been looking for a scientific discussion on that topic and coming up with not much.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10213739/
https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(25)...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551568/
The really interesting one out of those was the first one, which showed an actual physical side effect. In rats, not humans, with disclaimers about how hard it is to replicate in humans. I will keep an eye out for more mentions of that effect, for certain.
[0] Okay, I wanted to say more about the nausea thing, because I suppose this might be a controversial hot take ;-). I think the physical punishment dished out by the medication is the only reason many people see continued success. They could eliminate the side effects by eating less, but that was always the problem. If they lower the dose the side effects go away, but without the punishing side effects they start to gain weight.
Or maybe it's just my own demons talking. Can't tell you how many times I've asked myself why I was eating something in spite of knowing it was the wrong answer, that I was not hungry, etc. If I could answer that with reliably action, I wouldn't take tirzepatide. People may look down on me for being unable to tame those demons, but oh well, I do what works for me. I do want to be on the lookout for long term problems that me outweigh the massive improvement in my health that came with losing 100 pounds, however.
> It doesn’t seem like you’re particularly curious and it feels like my time is being wasted by a lack of transparency.
Sorry, I probably just misread your comment as the usual "hey you lazy fat fuckers why don't you just eat less instead of cheat with a pill" moralizing that crops up in these discussions. I don't really think those links you provided a lot of ammunition disproving that, at least not to me.
If anything, the people making it out to be some big conspiracy against mainstream medicine are doing it more for the money because they're often peddling some alternative medicine or supplements.
Does it pain me to say it? Nah, I'm numb :-/