39 pointsby thinkcontext8 hours ago9 comments
  • DivingForGold5 hours ago
    "If you’re a fan of privacy in our age of creeping digital authoritarianism, there’s one famously effective way to pass through U.S. Customs at an airport without worrying about a device search: travel with a burner phone only."

    What about setting your phone from the get go to store all data on the micro sim card ? Then, when traveling through airports, swap out for another micro sim that has some small, useless data on it, fake contact list, etc. ?

    Real sim card is so small can be hidden in a million places.

    • tdeck2 hours ago
      At least on Android they've removed the ability to encrypt data stored on external media, so in exchange for the ability to do this you're carrying around everything unencrypted (except what individual apps might encrypt themselves).
    • inigyou5 hours ago
      That isn't something that actually exists
  • 6 hours ago
    undefined
  • pbgcp2026an hour ago
    Do not cross with your gadgets. And just do not go to / via the US.
  • anon2914 hours ago
    When this hits the supreme Court they need to debar the prosecutors who bring these cases to begin with.
  • benoau7 hours ago
    Fascinating case and arms-race, seems like part of the issue is the bricking is too obvious...
  • throwuxiytayq4 hours ago
    Disgusting. I’ve never had to let anyone touch my phone in my entire life in any country I’ve visited.

    Is there a list of countries that does this? At this point it’s obvious I won’t ever be traveling to the US, but I’m curious if genuinely authoritarian countries like China are actually less of a police state at the border than the USA.

    • rmarquis2 hours ago
      I've been to China recently. No phone search whatsoever. Their Internet is behind the famous Great Firewall though, but there is no issue using a (foreigner-only) unlocked sim or e-sim to access the rest of the Internet.
    • ytoawwhra924 hours ago
      I think almost all countries do this if your name is on a list (as this person's is). It's the nature of the lists and what gets your name added to them that varies from country to country.
      • petterroea2 hours ago
        Visiting another country is a privilege, not a right.
        • 34 minutes ago
          undefined
        • joeblubaugh23 minutes ago
          This is a US citizen, so that’s a moot point
        • mdp20212 hours ago
          That, whatever it means, cannot mean losses of personal rights.
          • petterroeaan hour ago
            It means you aren't entitled to visit a foreign country. You aren't entitled to them letting you in.

            Of course in a perfect world we all trust each other and have open borders, but that's a privilege we have to work for. I'm European and enjoy the open borders, but also am well aware that such a situation is not a given.

            Cannot mean loss of personal rights, sure. Showing up at a border and being required to give up personal rights isn't ok.

            But many people in this thread are writing as if they actually believe they have a right to go anywhere, and that simply isn't the case. It's the kind of thing you need live in a strong passport country to believe.

        • aa-jvan hour ago
          Rights are universal, whether a state cares about them or not.
    • thenthenthen4 hours ago
      I travelled to the US three times and once had my devices checked. Travelled to China more than 50 times, never had anything checked.
      • crimsdingsan hour ago
        That's because they already checked in advance :)
        • 33 minutes ago
          undefined
    • artisinal3 hours ago
      UK passed a law for this recently. Germany has been doing it for a while.
  • ChrisArchitect7 hours ago
    Title is: A Feature That Makes Your Phone Data Self-Destruct in Authorities’ Hands May Soon Have Its Day in Court

    And it's 3 day old news

    [dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49024436

  • LLLDP8 hours ago
    [dead]
  • bmitc5 hours ago
    [dead]