Multicast TV Distribution on My Home Network(www.apalrd.net)

20 pointsby mrngm2 hours ago1 comment

NoMoreNicksLeftan hour ago
I'm not sure I understand the point. For small home networks, there is no bandwidth difference between this and streaming solutions like Jellyfin. Yes, this was a cool technology, and if some large provider like AT&T wanted to use this to broadcast channels to everyone at once it would've made more sense than streaming... but even for that use case the world has moved on. Does anyone watch scheduled television anymore except local news and sportsball?
- blacklionan hour ago
  IPTV from your ISP is typically multicast (even if your connection is point-to-point), and if you have more than one network behind your router (for example, you have separate networks for wire clients, owner's wifi and guests wifi) you need to understand hot it works to setup your router correctly that you can watch IPTV on any device in any of yours networks.
- ssl-322 minutes ago
  > I'm not sure I understand the point.
  To demonstrate...multicast TV distribution on a home network?
  > For small home networks, there is no bandwidth difference between this and streaming solutions like Jellyfin.
  Jellyfin and multicast TV distribution are not the same things, though. They're very different.
  Some other things that are very different include: The temperature of Lake Superior, my mother's collection of weird ceramic houses that light up, and red herring.
  > Yes, this was a cool technology,
  Multicast has ceased to be a cool technology? That's hot.
  > and if some large provider like AT&T wanted to use this to broadcast channels to everyone at once
  They do that.
  > it would've made more sense than streaming
  They do that, as well.
  > but even for that use case the world has moved on.
  All of it? Uniformly?
  > Does anyone watch scheduled television anymore except local news and sportsball?
  We should not use multicast TV distribution on home networks for local news and sportsball?