17 pointsby grigio2 days ago5 comments
  • kesor4 hours ago
    How is this low-effort zero-value non-article even on the first page of HN in the first place?
    • feverzsjan hour ago
      Friends/bots upvotes. It's like the only way to get your post on first page nowadays.
    • SOLAR_FIELDS3 hours ago
      Agree but I think it’s interesting to discuss the larger implication here. Nix the language and ecosystem has historically been completely unapproachable for people unwilling to beat their head against the wall continuously to figure it out. It is famously unapproachable. Now, the benefits are accessible to the quasi-layman. Good news all around
  • aidenn04 hours ago
    I'm not sure how much of this is complicated because of NixOS; going this far off the beaten path would be rather complicated in any distro.

    I'd be a lot more sure if the author had posted their nixos configuration somewhere...

  • linsomniac3 hours ago
    I've had a similar experience with NixOS configured by Claude Code, and it's been really nice. I have the same config on 3 machines, all managed in one git repo, including home manager and sops, and one of the machines I skin as a "thin client" removing most of my development tools and just using it to SSH/wezterm in to my main dev box, on a small and light ex-chromebook.
  • tim-projects4 hours ago
    > Ultra lightweight

    Doesn't nixos use a lot more diskspace than arch, because of its store?

    • linsomniac3 hours ago
      It seems like the "lightweight" they seem to be concerned with is RAM, not disc. I can't really comment on disc space usage on my own NixOS system, though my "thin client" skin does fit nicely on an old Chromebook, I think that guy has 32GB of storage.
      • SOLAR_FIELDSan hour ago
        I’ll just say as nix Darwin user the default vanilla install does not garbage collect well and every 2 months or so I have to hack around nuking shit in my system to free up space. Maybe NixOS itself is better managed and it’s an idiosyncrasy of nix-Darwin. Maybe not
  • whydoineedthis3 hours ago
    How is this considered “repeatable” when it takes several pages to describe how it’s glued together? By the same logic the pyramids of Giza are repeatable. Technically true, but not likely worth the effort.
    • aidenn03 hours ago
      It took several hours to do the first time, and it will take several hours to do the next time. Sounds repeatable to me :)