21 pointsby hermitcrab5 hours ago6 comments
  • nickpinkston4 hours ago
    "[T]he oddity I pointed out in that piece that the chuds are both really attached to classical antiquity and also don’t know very much about it."

    As a history nerd in the Bay Area tech scene, it always amazes me how so many of the e/acc, NRx, and "The West" people fit the quote above.

    I think this is why Curtis Yarvin has been successful, as he states bad history with confidence to people who either don't know the difference, or have a direct interest in promoting his "The rich should rule us, actually" ideology.

    • vlian20883 hours ago
      all history from 2000+ years ago is bad history. neither the chud nor the cuck vision of classical antiquity is anywhere near accurate. entire decades get extrapolated from a few surviving bits written a century after the events. every sentence in every history book about that era implicitly comes with "We assume that..."
      • paleotrope42 minutes ago
        Well at least we can filter out the Jeffrey of Monmouth's though.
        • paleotrope27 minutes ago
          Haha you can tell I listen to a lot history podcasts. I won't fix it.
  • temptemptemp1114 hours ago
    [dead]
  • Stratogeo3 hours ago
    [dead]
  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • A_D_E_P_T4 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • throw48472854 hours ago
      You should work on the ability to distinguish respect from charitability.

      One can be charitable to views that one does not respect. And if one ends up being disrespectful it does not mean that they were insufficiently charitable.