81 pointsby ronak_parmar7 hours ago19 comments
  • JeremyHerrman5 hours ago
    PSA stop putting bigco IP in your project names!

    has clawdbot taught us nothing?

  • heresalexandria6 hours ago
    Cool concept, will try it out! I've had decent results with computer use operating conventional editing tools, but being able to directly edit JSON project files is a solid optimization and opens up a lot of opportunities with things like modular templating.
    • ronak_parmar6 hours ago
      Thankyou. I am planning to make it opencode friendly too.. I think that would openup versatality and more experiments..;)
  • miltonlaxer7 hours ago
    Reminds me of https://www.screenkite.com/ The AI powered video editors are fun.
    • ronak_parmar7 hours ago
      yup but I had Premier Pro and Palmier Pro in mind while making it, hence the UI.;)
  • spottedmarley6 hours ago
    This is pretty dang cool but I guess I was hoping to see some very clever use of vision and maybe waveform analysis to give the model "eyes and ears" to edit audio and video. V2
  • xyzsparetimexyz7 hours ago
    Yeah I'm sure you need fable for the heavy reasoning task of editing tiktoks
    • heresalexandria6 hours ago
      My impression was that they made this editor with Fable, and its JSON project structure would only serve well for manipulation by lesser models.
    • ronak_parmar7 hours ago
      [dead]
  • KaseKun7 hours ago
    I have no use for this, however I am stunned by the simple and effective solution of using json+sse instead of an API to allow agent interaction Amazing work
  • faangguyindia6 hours ago
    cool!

    can this be used to make these style of videos from prompt?

    Style 1: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vGjrv2zjfsM

    Style 2: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6KoRHpAZ4zk

    • ronak_parmar6 hours ago
      Absolutely, in fact just give it clips, voice and a reference video(optional), command it and wait untill it finishes..
  • Jayakumark7 hours ago
    A demo video would be good.
    • ronak_parmar7 hours ago
      Yeah actually, that's a great idea, working on it ..(~ ̄▽ ̄)~
  • vanilagy6 hours ago
    You should strongly consider using Mediabunny to do all of the rendering client-side!
    • genxy6 hours ago
      I couldn't find a skill in your project that would help integrate mediabunny. The docs and examples look like they could really help. Having good example coverage allows agents to pickup libraries easily.

      https://github.com/Vanilagy/mediabunny

      • vanilagy5 hours ago
        Just point the agent at the docs, it'll understand them quickly. Mediabunny also has many examples and even a dedicated LLM page.
    • ronak_parmar5 hours ago
      [flagged]
  • mikert896 hours ago
    you can just give claude code access to ffmpeg
  • armcat5 hours ago
    This looks great, will try it out. I had a crazy idea of doing a full agentic demo video narration and cutting, so might try your tool with some tweaks.
    • ronak_parmar3 hours ago
      Thanks! That sounds like a really interesting use case. I'd love to see how it turns out. If you end up making those tweaks for full agentic narration and video cutting, feel free to share your experience or ideas, I'd be happy to learn from them and see if they could be incorporated into the tool.
  • upmostly7 hours ago
    Have you thought about integrating Remotion into this?
    • ronak_parmar7 hours ago
      What do you think the next update will be about..^_~
      • upmostly4 hours ago
        Just watch out for their license...
  • hotpartition5 hours ago
    Love that the timeline is just JSON and the UI hot-reloads. Agents and humans on the same edit is the interesting part.
  • chrisweekly7 hours ago
    I have little experience with video editing; a tool like this might be an ideal path to learn more. Thanks for creating and publishing it and sharing here!
    • ronak_parmar7 hours ago
      My pleasure. If you have any ideas, lets connect and make it more helpfuul!!
    • xgulfie6 hours ago
      You aren't going to learn by having the AI do it for you...
  • arnab7777 hours ago
    Ya, a demo video would be nice .
  • spacemanspiff016 hours ago
    You should have a hosted site for this - It is entirely frontend - right?
    • ronak_parmar6 hours ago
      almost! the editor/compositor is fully browser side, but the server is doing real work: project.json lives on disk (thats the whole point, any agent or script can edit it and fs.watch + sse hot reloads the ui), plus ffmpeg for the final export encode. so it needs the local server for the actual workflow.

      a hosted demo mode is a good idea though, project in localstorage + sample footage + mediarecorder export would let people feel the editor without cloning. the one thing it cant show is the main trick, watching an external agent rebuild your timeline live, since theres no local file for it to edit. might do a stripped demo build if theres interest

  • speedping7 hours ago
    Very cool project but having fable in the name makes it sound so tacky
    • ronak_parmar7 hours ago
      Yeah I though so but as people are so fond of Fable.. This would give them a poke to just take a look..;)
      • Yiin7 hours ago
        oh, I read fable as a story, fable cut meaning you can stitch up stories which is a form of storytelling, so quite fitting for video editor
        • 7 hours ago
          undefined
      • monitorlizard6 hours ago
        Since people like an unrelated product, you thought it would be good marketing to jack the brand? Maybe I should start calling my B2B SaaS products Salesforce too!
    • da_grift_shift6 hours ago
      The readme is full of compound Claudeisms, so why not ;-)

          per-shot energy
      
          frame-accurate
      
          word-pop
      
          reference-video
      
          CSS-@keyframes-animated SVGs render frame-accurately
    • yieldcrv6 hours ago
      it also worked
  • zhaodc5 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • nttylock6 hours ago
    [flagged]