14 pointsby mikemangialardi7 hours ago8 comments
  • bel85 hours ago
    This looks like the usual https://threejs.org animation built by LLMs.

    I'm more interested in:

    - The correctedness of the data and if it was reviewed.

    - The skills and challenges while building it. Was it a one shot? Did it had a feedback loop?

  • docheinestages5 hours ago
    Why do I have the feeling that the recent surge of "Fable built ..." is a marketing campaign by Anthropic?
  • pocksuppet5 hours ago
    This has every sign of being advanced slop. Before I proceed further, can you provide any evidence that anything on this page corresponds to anything in reality?
    • ActionHank5 hours ago
      I think at some point soon, it's going to become really cringy to put out the typical purple background with neon colour slop site. I do hope that people start to remember that just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
    • NotGMan5 hours ago
      Thats not the point of the presentatation: it's that Fable built a nice visualization.

      If Aristotle was right about it or not is an orthogonal argument.

      • polotics5 hours ago
        The question was whether Aristotle's model, as valid as it may or not be, is faithfully represented here.
  • gtirloni5 hours ago
    I've tried Fable on a few complex tasks and couldn't tell the difference over Opus 4.8, tbh.
  • Tossrock5 hours ago
    Should billboard the text rendering so it doesn't go invisible at oblique viewing angles
  • mcphage4 hours ago
    This kinda reminds me of the Pepsi Universe design doc. Random "hey let's make things like planets and orbits—that's science, right?"
  • chiengineer25 hours ago
    [dead]
  • hash06 hours ago
    This is a stunning idea and execution! I am glad I clicked on that link and spent a couple of minutes on it. Serious kudos, good Sir/Ma'am/[respectful appellation of your choosing].