2 pointsby getlawgdon2 hours ago2 comments
  • ativzzz12 minutes ago
    > How do you structure a brand new project? Scaffolding, git init/ignore? Repos? Initial commit strategies?

    Don't overthink it. Use whatever bootstrapping tools your project framework comes with (rails app? use `rails new`)

    > How do you keep stuff out of the context window that you don't want in it?

    Don't overthink it. Just use one chat per general topic. New topic -> new chat. Save anything relevant to the project that the agent doesn't pick up in new chats in AGENTS.md

    > How do you "layer" your work so it's much more about the context and integrity of the structure

    Save project specific needs/requirements in AGENTS.md or docs/ or skills or whatever and tinker until it works

    > Do you switch models

    Nowadays just for code review. Recently gpt5.5 has felt very good for general dev

    > What other tooling do you have alongside basic agents/environments?

    Neovim for code browsing (don't write much code anymore but the code editor is still useful for reading code) and various plugins/tools i've built up over the years

    Honestly, there's no blanket solution. The best engineers I've worked with all have different tools custom to their workflows

    > know I'm hitting a ceiling. My workflow is naive and nonpro, a lot of tinkering and bashing my way through code generation, context drift, manual fixes, etc.

    Hit a ceiling? Fix it. Typically it's

    - do work

    - notice something annoying about your workflow

    - fix it systemically - research different solutions - sometimes it's writing a small script (agents are great for this), sometimes it's finding a new tool, sometimes it's overhauling your entire system, it just depends

    - do work

    repeat...

    there's really no one stop solution for a perfect workflow

  • blinkbatan hour ago
    I don't find that the models are so capable that the workflow can be "much less about prompts". you still need to be in the loop, prompting and validating, to get good output. people will say otherwise -- I say those people are full of shit, have an adverse incentive, or don't have high standards.
    • getlawgdon41 minutes ago
      Thanks. I could have phrased that better. What I meant was that so much of my work has been about the prompt that I feel like I'm neglecting where the rest of the process is.