101 pointsby randycupertino10 hours ago15 comments
  • msisk64 hours ago
    I recently moved to the St. Louis area for a software job at Boeing. I'm actually in a nice quiet neighborhood in St. Charles right under the flight path for planes landing at Lambert Field.

    The fireworks last night were insane. All around me folks were setting off commercial grade fireworks bursting hundreds of feet in the air. The house was shaking, my dogs were freaking out, one of them had a seizure. The air was filled with smoke and smelled of gun powder. It was one of the craziest things I've ever experienced.

    Next year I'll definitely be planning an out-of-town vacation for the 4th to some location with firework restrictions.

    I don't know what the planes were doing; I didn't hear or see any landing with all the smoke and noise.

    • dylan6043 hours ago
      > Next year I'll definitely be planning an out-of-town vacation for the 4th to some location with firework restrictions

      Fireworks are not legal to shoot in pretty much any city. They are not legal in my city. That did not stop them from being used. In fact, they are going off around me the night after too

    • geerlingguyan hour ago
      As another STL resident, fireworks are illegal everywhere in the County (not sure if St. Charles as well, but probably), and our local muni PD even sent out multiple warnings about prosecution.

      But our inner ring suburb was similarly full of smoke last night and the smell of many amateur fireworks shows.

      Only a few in my neighborhood, but they were quite the production. I remember firing a few bottle rockets as a kid, but these were definitely a few steps above that! Sounded like mini mortars, maybe those boxes with a bunch of shells timed to go after each other.

    • greggoB3 hours ago
      > one of them had a seizure

      It's insane to me how much dogs are supposedly loved by such a large chunk of the pop, and yet people proceed to go apeshit with fireworks fully knowing how badly this affects them.

      • xeromal3 hours ago
        My guess because we just read of the seizure stories online but 95% of dogs are ok with it. Mine is. There's a limit to dealing with edge cases that most people have.

        Not saying this is how I feel or act though.

        • erikerikson2 hours ago
          My dog, now passed after a long and happy life, loved fireworks deeply. It was his favorite day of the year. He would chase and pretend to bite, bark, and run around with joy.

          To be fair, I am quite certain he was an outlier.

        • nozzlegear2 hours ago
          We have three dogs of different breeds and ages, none of them handle fireworks well. They don't have seizures, but one of them turns into a quivering, shaking mess and the other two try to hide under couches and beds. I wish they were okay with it, but my wife and I have to plan our 4th around the dogs because of how they react.
        • mikeocool2 hours ago
          I think you’re probably right about people’s feelings on the matter.

          Though in my experience dogs that are ok with fireworks are the edge case.

        • tessierashpoolan hour ago
          no, 95% of dogs are not okay with it.

          95% of the dogs in your home are okay with it.

          this study from Psychology Today finds that 83% of dogs freak out when they hear loud noises:

          https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/canine-corner/202202...

          • mminer23718 minutes ago
            That study doesn't say "freak out". It says 83% ever showed "any fear" of fireworks, which is a huge variation. My doesn't like going outside when there are fireworks, but the sound of rain freaks him out way more.
      • chrismorgan3 hours ago
        Not just dogs; more than a few humans don’t cope with loud noises of various kinds.
      • thebruce87m21 minutes ago
        I’m not a dog owner but aren’t you supposed to play fireworks on your TV at increasing volume in the preceding days to get them used to it?

        That seems a better option than expecting everyone else to change their behaviour because of a pet you chose.

      • colechristensen2 hours ago
        The degradation of canine genetics and behavior to the point where loud noises cause seizures is pretty absurd. I love dogs but I grew up around working dogs. City people have pushed dog breeding to the point where the desirable dog is riddled with some pretty extreme codependency and anxiety that they mistake for affection and companionship. The poor animals spending their lives in a few hundred square feet and completely alone for a large majority of their lives kinda sickens me.
        • petrean hour ago
          I agree, but luckily my terrier apparently doesn't give a poo about fireworks. Probably nobody jad thrown fireworks at him yet. My inlaws' country dog (also a fox terrier mix with the same temperament) growls at people, especially teens, smelling of powder and barks at fireworks and motorbikes. Good thing he's not a Malinois to nip those teens and chase the motorbikes. So it'a more of a nature vs. nurture thing.
          • colechristensen15 minutes ago
            dog behavior is strictly a reflection of their owner
      • aaron69519 minutes ago
        [dead]
      • chneu2 hours ago
        Like 80% of dog owners treat dogs like possessions. When I say "like possessions" I mean they abuse them by physical means or by locking them into small apartments and not meeting the animals basic needs. It's wild how people trap dogs into small city/suburb boxes and then 'train' them to be good(break them). I stand by 80% if you account for global numbers and not just western/developed nations.

        In much of the developed world it's weirdly mandatory to have a dog or cat. The way folks treat them is so messed up. Then these folks turn around and claim they love animals. It's nonsense. Most people don't need a pet nor do they treat them like an animal lover would.

        But words have no meaning nowadays. Everyone is everything they want to be.

    • chasil40 minutes ago
      It would be more practical if major cities had "fireworks zones" with ambulances on call and perhaps some safety advice.
  • ggm11 minutes ago
    Flying into London on November 5 a decade or so ago I was struck by how similar things looked to WW2 bombing run photographs, except it was in colour.

    A moment of pause.

  • bluedino5 hours ago
    They really should be controlled a lot more - a nearby house was hit by some sort of Roman candle thing and completely burned down the other night.

    There was at least a lot less "illegal fireworks" when people had the drive two states away to buy them.

    • skybrian4 hours ago
      Doesn't help in California because people buy them in Nevada and resell them. Apparently that's easier to do nowadays due to the Internet?

      https://oaklandside.org/2026/07/01/illegal-fireworks-police-...

      > Despite strict fireworks bans in many cities, including Oakland, they’ve become a year-round nuisance in the Bay Area. And one of the primary ways they’re spread is through the enterprising but illegal work of small-time dealers who obtain the contraband from licensed shops outside of California, sneak it into the state, and then sell hundreds and even thousands of pounds of explosives out of homes, vehicles, storage units, and even corner stores.

      • SilverElfin2 hours ago
        In a lot of states, Indian reservations can also sell them. And they’re basically completely unregulated. It’s illegal to bring them or set them off into other towns but people do it. Hundreds of people. And tens of thousands have to be repeatedly woken up because of their selfishness.
    • SoftTalker5 hours ago
      Yeah not sure why that changed, when I was a kid you could only get sparklers and small stuff that stayed on the ground. Today I could get everything for a near-professional show if I wanted to spend the money.
      • Loughla5 hours ago
        When I was a kid you could get actual m80's that were like a quarter stick of dynamite. Now you can only get little firecrackers that don't even blow up little green army men.

        It's really dependent on your state laws. My state allows fireworks, so you can get most things but they are very limited in size and explosive content.

        What it amounts to is that most cities/counties don't enforce their existing laws in this area because people would have a shit fit, and they would arrest so many people that it's kind of impossible.

        Something something banning things doesn't really work to do anything but make criminals out of every day people.

        • jandrewrogers4 hours ago
          > actual m80's that were like a quarter stick of dynamite

          Not even close.

          A military M80 [0] is ~5g of flash powder, an inconsequential amount of low-explosive albeit enough to seriously injure yourself. The consumer "M80" are even weaker. These are used to simulate real explosions by the military.

          The smallest standardized military demolition charge contains ~110g of TNT, in a similar small cylindrical format. There are multiple orders of magnitude difference in power between an M80 and these demolition charges.

          A "quarter stick of dynamite" isn't a standard thing. But if it was, it would probably come in around 50g of TNT equivalent.

          [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-80_(explosive)

          • Fezzik3 hours ago
            You could sure make decent explosives with OTC fireworks though - in the early 90s we would buy hundreds of those whistling fireworks, hammer them, cut the bottoms off, and then fill various bottles with all the powder. We made a shockwave with one of our makeshift bombs and decided we should probably stop after that.
            • jandrewrogers31 minutes ago
              The old school whistling fireworks were often based on picrate chemistry. Picrates famously have the ability when burned to hover between normally deflagration and true detonation; the whistling is a side effect of this. One of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history (see below) was a picrate explosion. These aren’t used anymore for safety reasons; they don’t have a great stability profile and picrates are true high-explosives.

              Over the years they have found alternatives for and phased out most high-explosives used in fireworks. Many high-explosives will just deflagrate/burn but can spontaneously detonate with considerable power if the conditions are right, which makes them dangerous.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_Explosion

        • jtbayly4 hours ago
          M80s were more like 1/8th of a stick, I think. My uncle bought quarter sticks of dynamite one time. Wow. Quite a bit bigger and louder than an M80, and M80s were LOUD! My dad's cousin blew off most of his thumb and parts of several fingers with one. It was old, and it had a flash fuse. He was planning to toss it, but it went off instantly. (Don't hold fireworks when you are lighting them.)

          A couple of years ago my brother got some flat triangles from a guy on the side of the road. First thing I've seen in years that was like an M80. We put a flat soccer ball over one, and it went 50 feet in the air. Very fun.

      • fc417fc8025 hours ago
        > Today I could get everything for a near-professional show if I wanted to spend the money.

        Not unless you're purchasing on the black market or (illegally) manufacturing it yourself.† The professional stuff is substantially larger than anything sold on the consumer market.

        † Which is surprisingly trivial to do BTW but please be extremely cautious and very thoroughly master the underlying theory if you decide to go that route.

        • trollbridgean hour ago
          Yep. I volunteered for a real fireworks show in California once. The size of the mortars was… so much bigger than the stuff I was used to seeing people get at fireworks shops.

          Along with the reminder from the safety coordinator that each firework was capable of completely talking your arm or leg off. The “consumer” grade fireworks aren’t capable of that, although they’re still dangerous.

        • jtbayly5 hours ago
          I'm not sure if being homemade was the reason, but I just heard about a medflight for somebody hit by a homemade firework.

          I say this as somebody with a book on how to make them, but I've always been a bit too scared to try.

          • fc417fc8024 hours ago
            Being homemade is (almost) never in and of itself a reason. A lack of knowledge or judgment certainly can be. However often the motivation for DIY is to circumvent regulations to go big but of course one of the primary reasons for such regulations is that the associated consequences when things go wrong are dire. The story could well have turned out the same even if the item had been purchased from a reputable vendor. There's a very good reason the professional shows use barges or large fields and set up a huge exclusion zone around them.
      • nozzlegear2 hours ago
        When I was a kid growing up in Iowa in the 90s, my friends and I would hold Roman candles and bottle rockets in our hands and try to shoot them at each other. We're lucky we didn't get seriously injured, but it was all fun and games back then as long as you didn't tell your parents.
        • an hour ago
          undefined
      • topgrain25 hours ago
        Did you move? There are huge differences between states in what’s available, all the way from “just sparklers and other tiny stuff that doesn’t fly” up to “anything that doesn’t require an explosives license”, and within states areas near cities often restrict fireworks sales.
        • lazide4 hours ago
          Some places, I’m pretty sure they just waive the explosives license too.
      • andrewinardeer5 hours ago
        Capitalism. Get rich or die trying.
    • fc417fc8024 hours ago
      Rather than regulate fireworks out of existence wouldn't it be better to fix the problem at the root? Why do we permit such fire prone housing to be built just to save a few dollars?
      • loeg2 hours ago
        The root problem is drunk people lighting off a bunch of rocket-propelled explosives, actually. Even if the houses were fireproof concrete bunkers, they'd still be starting wildfires in the grass/brush/trees. (And of course, it's more than "a few dollars.")
      • infecto4 hours ago
        What alternative do you propose?
        • 3 hours ago
          undefined
  • cogogo5 hours ago
    Off topic but I went to a local town’s medium-sized professional fireworks show this weekend and there were none of those small flash really loud fireworks that shake you to the core. Not even in the grand finale. Oddly they are what I enjoy most. Have they gone out of fashion or do they mess too much with pets?
    • mleo2 hours ago
      There are such a wide variety of fireworks available now there is probably less need for those specifically. The show I was at still had enough loud booms to set off dozens of cars' alarms repeatedly during the twenty minutes.
    • PyWoody3 hours ago
      My town of <1k population had their fireworks tonight. I want to say at least half of the fireworks rattled your bones and jimmied your organs.
    • 3 hours ago
      undefined
    • AnimalMuppet4 hours ago
      I believe those are called "salutes".
      • nozzlegear2 hours ago
        That's what I know them as too. We used to go out to a family friend's farm for a fireworks show he'd put on every 4th, and he'd always have a bunch of those interspersed. They used to be my favorite growing up, because of the anticipation between when it launched and when it would explode.
    • pylua4 hours ago
      You mean mortars ?
    • consensus15 hours ago
      They sure haven't gone out of fashion on the streets of SF. My ears were ringing!
    • 2OEH8eoCRo05 hours ago
      I miss those too. I remember as a kid one display that shot a bunch of really bright white flare-like fireworks that were blinding and hung in the sky followed by dozens of those small but loud ones and it was memorable.
  • anshumankmr10 minutes ago
    Should ideally have an exclusion no fireworks/drones zone near airports esp. on such a day IDK that is just me.
  • monksyan hour ago
    This is more of an issue with operating during the week before and after 4th of July in Chicago. As I'm writing fireworks are going off.

    Fireworks (display) kinds are illegal in Illinois and there are absolutely no fireworks shot off the before and after 4th of july. Nothing happens nothing to see here.

  • eBombzor2 hours ago
    Get rid of fireworks, replace with drone shows. Sick of fireworks and the resulting pollution that comes with them.
  • userbinator5 hours ago
    Delta said Sunday a post-flight inspection showed no damage to the aircraft.

    Not surprising, as a firework is designed to disintegrate and the outer surface of a plane is not flammable. Bird strikes are probably a higher risk.

    • 7bees4 hours ago
      Many fireworks are designed to explode at altitude. The biggest risk is probably if the firework is ingested into an engine (also a major risk for bird strikes).
      • fc417fc8024 hours ago
        Given the sheer quantity of energy that's already being continuously released in an engine would a small firework actually pose more danger than a bird? There's no bones in a firework after all.
        • userbinator3 hours ago
          Even small bird strikes are usually a non-event, as the engines are designed to withstand them (there's a very well-known YouTube video of frozen chickens being fired into one, and those are already a lot bigger and harder than most birds they'll encounter.) It's the big ones that make the news.
      • lazide4 hours ago
        99% of them also don’t have enough explosive force to do more than damage a hand.
        • siriaan4 hours ago
          What about the 1%?
          • lazide4 hours ago
            Clearly the plane wasn’t hit by one, eh, or we’d have an entirely different headline.
  • OsrsNeedsf2P5 hours ago
    Am I the only one who thinks the risks are worth the reward? People are celebrating, kids are having fun. Yes a few people blow their hands off, but are we going to remove everything, one by one, in the name of safety?
    • somehnguyan hour ago
      Nope, completely with you on this. The logical conclusion of banning everything dangerous is everything in existence being banned. There are many things people do that I think are dumb or dangerous but that doesn't mean I think they should be banned from doing them.
    • georgeburdell2 hours ago
      I’m with you. I shoot off small fireworks for my kids and my immediate neighbor on our quiet street, and we have a neighbor a few doors down who invariably calls the cops. This has been going on since the 2000s when she moved in. If I’m fined, I just pay it.
    • chneu2 hours ago
      Like 10 people died in my state on the 4th. A few were not directly involved in celebrations but were just doing their own thing.

      Does that really sound reasonable to you?

      • colechristensen2 hours ago
        Died of what?

        25,000 people die in my state every year, 10 in a day would be miraculously low.

    • anon70005 hours ago
      Come on, it’s not a choice between complete anarchy and complete restriction.

      It is very, very fair for society to be like “hm I think X activity is easy to abuse in a way that hurts innocent bystanders,” and then limits the activity to people with licenses and training or things like that.

      Like no, it’s totally not cool to give a free pass to people who are putting other people’s lives and homes at risk. How would you feel if your house burned down because your neighbor did something stupid?

      I don’t care if it’s just your own life at risk. But you’re essentially saying that people should be free to play around with explosive devices in dense city neighborhoods. Fuck no, it’s fucking concerning to have an explosion rattle your windows. The people most likely to do this shit in the streets have no clue what they’re doing.

      • Xirdus4 hours ago
        > How would you feel if your house burned down because your neighbor did something stupid?

        Probably the same way I'd feel if it burned down because my neighbor did some other stupid thing, like drive into it with a truck or try stealing electricity. There would be many feelings probably, but none of them would be "trucks/DIY should be illegal".

        • chneu2 hours ago
          What if there was one day a year where it was expected for people to speed through your neighborhood at 20 over the speed limit, which ends up with a bunch of people driving into houses with their vehicles?

          It's not really the fireworks that is the issue. It's the alcohol, drugs, and overall attitude towards a dangerous activity. It's a bit different than a random mishap or whatnot.

          • Xirdus8 minutes ago
            > What if there was one day a year where it was expected for people to speed through your neighborhood at 20 over the speed limit, which ends up with a bunch of people driving into houses with their vehicles?

            You mean All Saints Day (1st of November)? No, thousands of drunk drivers taking dozens of innocent lives and hurting hundreds more, year after year like a clockwork, is still not a reason to ban trucks, or any other car type. Or to cancel All Saints Day, if that's what you're implying.

        • zamalek3 hours ago
          Stealing electricity is already illegal. Driving a truck into your home could be a genuine accident, but it's more likely that alcohol was involved first (which is illegal with driving).
          • Xirdus18 minutes ago
            > Stealing electricity is already illegal.

            So is shooting a house with fireworks. I'm against a general ban on doingelectrical work yourself, and against a general ban on fireworks.

          • jmb992 hours ago
            Do you think it’s legal to shoot a firework at someone’s house?
      • fc417fc8024 hours ago
        You are arguing against a straw man. It was never claimed or even implied that society can't or shouldn't regulate activities that cause harm. The cost benefit tradeoff in this specific instance was called into question and the broader implications of a consistent application of the same bar across all of society was inquired about.

        > you’re essentially saying that people should be free to play around with explosive devices in dense city neighborhoods. Fuck no, it’s fucking concerning to have an explosion rattle your windows.

        This is nothing more than emotional grandstanding. You could construct similar rants against a canister of gas or bottle of starter fluid. Obviously how you use the thing is important.

        Lest you miss my point or think I miss the mark there are video footage of clueless people nearly killing themselves and others through entirely avoidable mishaps with gasoline abound.

        The question is the amount of knowledge and judgment required, the likelihood of mishap, and the size of the consequences when one inevitably happens. Regulation needs to balance these things against utility and personal freedom.

        • lazyasciiart2 hours ago
          > Obviously how you use the thing is important.

          Is there a way to use large fireworks in a residential neighborhood that isn’t “light them on fire to cause an explosion”?

      • engineer_223 hours ago
        > Like no, it’s totally not cool to give a free pass to people who are putting other people’s lives and homes at risk. How would you feel if your house burned down because your neighbor did something stupid?

        We quite literally have a long and rich tradition of laws to handle exactly this.

      • protocolture2 hours ago
        >How would you feel if your house burned down because your neighbor did something stupid?

        Burning your neighbors house down is already illegal. You and they should already have insurance. House fires in human dwellings have been a risk since we started building houses next to other houses.

        The issue is that we (and I mean worldwide) have gone from legalism as a method of settling disputes and advertising penalties for destructive behavior, to outlawing risk entirely.

        The crux of the matter is that no one stops to point out where the line is. Laws will come in to penalise low probability risks, people make these arguments "wont someone think of the children" and then lawmakers turn on to even lower probability risks.

        If you had even a benchmark, "more probable than x is outlawed" people would be more understanding. And its not a slippery slope argument, because the slope seems to be the point and without a line the destination appears to be all possible risk.

        • wonnagean hour ago
          I'm gonna go ahead and assume you don't believe in driver licenses and speed limits either
          • protocolture2 minutes ago
            I have nuanced views on both.

            I am gonna go ahead and assume theres no freedom you wouldn't give away for safety if the government justified it in the right way.

    • pandaman2 hours ago
      I am fine with the professional fireworks shows but people setting fireworks inside residential areas, in all hours of night, for weeks during summer is just people being massive douchebags.
      • trollbridgean hour ago
        Right.

        On the evening of July 4, fine.

        Setting off firecrackers in urban areas otherwise is simply antisocial behaviour and should be treated as such.

    • consensus15 hours ago
      You're not the only one. There are few things I hate more than safetyists.
    • wonnagean hour ago
      "Some of you may die, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make" was supposed to be a comically evil statement in Shrek
  • petrean hour ago
    When clowns are in charge the country looks like a circus.
  • ButlerianJihad5 hours ago
    Fun fact: “Midway” is also the name of an American manufacturer of video and pinball games, and a Pacific theater of war in World War II, the most important victory in US Naval history. (The airport took this name in July 1949, according to the English Wikipedia.)

    https://web.archive.org/web/20080414001228if_/http://www.fly...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Cup_Soccer_(pinball)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Tigers_(video_game)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rampage_(video_game)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminator_2:_Judgment_Day_(ar...

    It’s also the name of a district/neighborhood of San Diego which takes its name from Midway Drive, particularly where it intersects with Rosecrans St.

    Okay, “Midway” is a lot of things.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midway

    • pezezin5 hours ago
      Midway's most famous and controversial game is, without a doubt, Mortal Kombat.
      • joezydeco2 hours ago
        MK was the most controversial, but Midway was also the US manufacturer of Space Invaders and Pac-Man.
  • zamalek6 hours ago
    I loved playing with fireworks as a kid, and surprisingly have all appendages and senses intact, I even considered pyro as a job - so I definitely get the appeal.

    I just think it's time that we left it to the professionals. Unless you are engaging in science or physics, I don't see the value in letting them off yourself.

    ~~It's also weird that America's birthday is celebrated using a Chinese invention.~~ Edit: bad point, I stand corrected.

    • afavour6 hours ago
      > It's also weird that America's birthday is celebrated using a Chinese invention.

      Not really. America is an amalgamation of all the countries and cultures that emigrated to it. It’s one of the best things about it.

    • dullcrisp6 hours ago
      That’s such a strange thing to say. Should we only use things invented in the last 300 years on the 4th of July?
      • netsharc6 hours ago
        Now I wonder who invented wheat, or sugar (used to make cake)?

        Also hotdogs are made with Wiener sausages, which are from...

        • craftkiller4 hours ago
          > Now I wonder who invented [...] sugar (used to make cake)?

          If you're talking about the refined product, then India. If you're talking about the plant, then New Guinea and Taiwan.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_sugar

        • onionisafruit5 hours ago
          beef or pork if you’re lucky
          • Isamu5 hours ago
            I tried tofu dogs for the first time on the grill, they were pretty good.
          • dh20225 hours ago
            In the production of these hotdogs no animals were harmed!
          • davrosthedalek4 hours ago
            Das Auge ist (man) mit.
        • dnautics5 hours ago
          Austria! nothing bad came from Austria
          • hi_hi4 hours ago
            The people of Frankfurt would like to have a word!
      • echelon5 hours ago
        No more using the English language, either.
        • PaulDavisThe1st5 hours ago
          You mean since it was invented by Indians, Germans and the French?
    • lotu2 hours ago
      Maybe leaving it to professionals would make more sense, but the majority of people aren’t in favor of it. I’m not even in favor of it and I had a couple fireworks bursting right outside my balcony last night. I was on the balcony and a ducked, though I would have been fine if I didn’t. Maybe require a brief safety training before purchasing? I’m not sure exactly what is going to reduce stupid behavior with explosives.
    • stevage6 hours ago
      You literally just explained the value.
    • consensus15 hours ago
      Fell free to leave it to the professionals then. That has always been your right.
    • greenavocado5 hours ago
      > I just think it's time that we left it to the professionals.

      Pulling up the ladder behind you, eh? So nice of you to think of the children.

      • zamalek3 hours ago
        Yes, because what I was doing was objectively dangerous. Dueling used to be a commonly accepted practice, yes even killing - pity that ladder was pulled up! What about the children's chemistry sets that included uranium, mercury, and cyanide?
    • ActorNightly5 hours ago
      [flagged]
      • a34729t5 hours ago
        I concur, this would be good for developing cheap drone warfare capabilities. I mean, I love loud explosions and the sound of freedom because I'm not a wuss, but we need to get our drone game on China's level.
        • consensus15 hours ago
          Get the drone show up and open it up to amateurs trying to shoot down the drone show for maximum adversarial drone warfare preparedness!
          • fc417fc8024 hours ago
            That would unironically be an amazing festival activity. A drone lightshow open to public participation where the different colors are tied to swarms engaged in a battle royale.

            I also can't wait for the return of traditional blood sport events with bipedal robots as the contenders (but I digress).

      • cube005 hours ago
      • jimbooonooo4 hours ago
        freedom loving Democratic socialist here, this stance is very St Thomas Aquinas of you. let people continue to do the things you did without pulling up the ladder behind you. it's just for a night or two, the animals will live.
      • doublerabbit4 hours ago
        Pollution too.

        Microbits of plastic, atmospheric smoke, splintered pieces of wood, wildfires.

      • s1artibartfast5 hours ago
        Ban keeping animals and replace them with robots or animal films.

        Barking dogs cause far more irritation than the nightly fireworks in June and July.

        Plus, the animals would not have to suffer.

      • JumpCrisscross5 hours ago
        This is almost certain to backfire. Better: make drone shows more available, and maybe subsidise them with a tax on fireworks.
  • comrade12346 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • linzhangrun4 hours ago
    Anti-aircraft artillery...
  • SilverElfin2 hours ago
    I see way too many trashy people setting off commercial grade illegal fireworks in the middle of crowded cities and neighborhoods. It is incredibly disruptive and damaging. Vets are traumatized. Dogs are traumatized. And sleep deprived parents have to repeatedly put babies back to sleep. It is insane that police do not enforce laws against these criminals.
    • bayarearefugee20 minutes ago
      > It is insane that police do not enforce laws against these criminals.

      Not that I've known a ton of people who work for local police departments, but the majority of the ones I have known are exactly the type of people who are likely to partake in illegal residential fireworks around the 4th of July.

    • IG_Semmelweissan hour ago
      we have multifelons (+10 arrests) running around and committing new crimes -often killing- in nearly all major urban centers.

      What makes you think police are going to pay heed to teens with heavy pyrotecnic ordinance ?

      And even if they did, would the DA prosecute ?

    • colechristensen2 hours ago
      Suck it up. You chose to live in a city.
      • trollbridgean hour ago
        And hence why lots of people don’t want to live in dense cities, and then we end up with NIMBYs who want strict housing codes so they don’t have to live near people who set off fireworks.

        Living in a city shouldn’t have to mean tolerating lawlessness.

      • paulbgdan hour ago
        Unfortunately it's not just dense cities, and all it takes is 1 neighbor to ruin your night.
      • antonvs43 minutes ago
        I chose to live in a city with laws. The ones who are in the wrong place are the ones who don’t want to follow those laws.