7 pointsby Bender9 hours ago2 comments
  • NoPicklez2 hours ago
    If only they were regulated and tested to meet a particular standard...

    Those in Australia with understand

  • fred_is_fred5 hours ago
    Completely misleading headline. Is the Daily Mail a reliable source?

    "The team at Environmental Working Group (EWG), a nonprofit health and environmental advocacy organization, noted that the remaining 80 percent of products were not deemed inherently dangerous.

    Instead, they failed to meet EWG's standards because they contained ingredients of concern, offered insufficient UVA protection, used spray formulations or made protection claims the group believes are misleading."