17 pointsby cwwc3 hours ago8 comments
  • segmondyan hour ago
    The failure that is llama4 needs to be studied. Meta was kicking ass with llama3.x and then something happened, something really went wrong. what happened between that time and llama4? I think it happened after llama3.1, llama3.2 was nothing to write home about. We need the gossips, maybe a book
    • freedomben39 minutes ago
      I would absolutely buy that book. Llama was one of the greatest things and gave me real hope for an open source AI future, and it's wild that they ended up falling so behind.

      I've heard rumors that it had to do with talent loss, but just rumors.

      • segmondy33 minutes ago
        The rumors I heard was that once llama3 became successful, everyone that had influence wanted to attach themselves to it and they did, destroying the original team and the culture in the process, by the time llama4 landed the smart ones were beginning to bow out.
  • alkyonan hour ago
    I wonder what will be the next big thing for Zuck after metaverse failure and now AI coming to nothing? Perpetual motion machines?
    • t0mpr1c3an hour ago
      Breaking news: Meta reallocates 100,000 AI workers to trade tulip bulb derivatives
  • ahartmetz24 minutes ago
    Aka I thought the stuff that these other guys are doing was not so difficult. No one can replace me, of course.

    Many such cases.

  • nitwit00532 minutes ago
    > At the time, he said, executives were "super optimistic" about tools like Claude Code from AI startup Anthropic.

    Some guy in sales at Anthropic has a new yacht though.

  • shimman2 hours ago
    Can't think of a better poster child of complete corporate waste that benefits no one whose assets should be seized and redistributed to the masses.

    For the amount that Meta wastes on LLM spending you can pay for things like universal childcare, public community college, and providing free lunch to all public students.

    If you care about things like money, look up the dollar returns on feeding children during their development or when you tell families they don't have be an economic burden for simply existing.

    A better world is possible.

    • Avicebron2 hours ago
      I mean, we can call it a voluntary surrender of their networth for the public good. How many school teachers could be funded by splitting and selling his ranch in hawaii
      • cyanydeez2 hours ago
        So, for one: the stockmarket is now the equivelent of bitcoin; just a figment of value where rich people drive up costs. Just like a car is _invaluable_ to you not because of it's material value but because what it does out strips it's raw goods, facebook is mostly a bunch of tiny bubbles.

        So you ask yourself, _if this thing disappeared tomorrow_, what would be the actual loss. It's definitely not it's valuation.

        • Avicebronan hour ago
          The ranch in hawaii is a real asset...
  • dude2507112 hours ago
    Who is the genius who told him development will get faster?

    The man can't catch a break!

  • ChrisArchitect2 hours ago
    Related:

    Meta’s chaotic AI strategy

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48523271

    Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth Admits the Company's AI Reorg Was 'Atrocious'

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48548461

  • raychis2 hours ago
    [dead]