126 pointsby hashier9 hours ago9 comments
  • oliyoung19 minutes ago
    Immich is such a no-brainer replacement for Apple Photos or Google Photos, combined with VPN like Tailscale, it's almost a drop in replacement
  • psadauskas27 minutes ago
    Has the ios photo sync gotten better? I've got 20k photos on my phone, and last I tried it filled up the storage on my phone with the originals, and never completed the process, even after leaving my phone open, unlocked, and the immich app running in the foreground for several days, on the same local network as the server.

    I know they were working on it, but haven't kept up, I just want to know if it works better now and I should try again.

    • Lukas_Skywalker4 minutes ago
      I have synced ~9000 photos from my phone in february. That worked pretty well. I was done in about 10 hours. I don't remember whether the originals were downloaded, or whether they were deleted automatically afterwards. Felt like a smooth process though.
  • Cider9986an hour ago
    When I was switching to GrapheneOS from iOS, I decided to self host my photos. I considered Immich, but I settled on Ente because of the encryption. Ente Photos is extremely polished and it's comparable quality to Apple photos.

    It's cool they keep the server open and selfhostable instead of only open clients like many e2ee projects do.

    I like how you can share an album and anyone can contribute to it without an account. Another cool feature is that you can select photos to lock when you hand your phone to somebody so they can only see the ones you selected without your device unlock.

    • kristopolousan hour ago
      for people wondering:

      "Ente Photos is a paid service, but we offer 10GB of free storage. You can also >>clone this repository and choose to self-host<<."

      So both forms...

      https://github.com/ente/ente

  • phikappa5 hours ago
    There's a lot of things I spent a ton of time setting up, use once, and then never again. Tons of things that are easy to set up, and provide small benefits every day for a long time. Immich has got to be the thing that I've spent ages setting up, use extremely infrequently but the one time a year I use it I'm so happy I did. Great software.
    • nickthegreek3 hours ago
      Man, I wish my experience was as nice. I used the proxmox lxc for it and after a 2 months of organizing I had some corruption and didn't have the fortitude to get through the debugging. It might have been related to a big version migration if I remember correctly. It turned me off the stack. The upgrading wasn't as turnkey as I wanted it to be and I dont think the case is different today.

      I just want to be able to organize my folders outside of some dumb library system and immich at the time fought that as well.

      • Saris9 minutes ago
        In proxmox restoring a backup is really easy, I'm surprised you didn't do that!
      • ravenstine2 hours ago
        I'm not sure I will ever upgrade Immich again. When I upgraded to the next minor version (I forget which off the top of my head), the data migration corrupted my database such that no images would be served. Fortunately I had the old database backed up, so I restored it, rolled back to the older version of Immich, and things were back to normal. I like Immich, but this is not good for software that's beyond the first major version, and also handles archiving people's personal data.
        • drdexebtjlan hour ago
          > Fortunately I had the old database backed up

          You say this as if it wasn’t Immich itself that backed up the database automatically next to your image files.

          I think they’re one of the best self-hosted services when it comes to backup/restore — enabling it by default — and when it comes to migrations — no breaking changes in minor versions after 1.0.

          Did you report this issue so I could try and reproduce it?

          • stavros37 minutes ago
            I had an issue where my thumbnails were borked somehow, so I deleted them all. However, I didn't delete the database entries, so they never got regenerated.

            I ended up doing that manually, but it's great to see that is now a first class citizen in 3.0.0. I love Immich.

      • altran15022 hours ago
        [dead]
    • prudhvis5 hours ago
      [dead]
  • MohamedMabrouk3 hours ago
    Immich is an amazing software. I use it regularly as an alternative along side Google photos. I keep in it large videos that I wouldn't upload normally to Google photos + the snappy experience at home vs Cloud-Bades solution.
  • brewtide2 hours ago
    Does anyone have any pointers on the best way to import roughly 14 Google takeout chunks into immich?

    I've downloaded all the chunks once, only to find them corrupted due to... Their 50gb size and using a browser in theory. One also cannot seem to use wget or alternatives because of the auth / session cookies required via Google takeout.

    I've yet to even broach the aspect of importing each giant bundle into immich because I've not had success in even grabbing the takeout files correctly, but would LOVE pointers on the best way of importing the roughly 700gb into the database without it ALL going wrong.

    I've had great success with immich running in docker for the past year or so, although I have yet to upgrade to the newest version. Google photos backups have been disabled on my phone for a year or so, but I yet to haul in all of the past years.

    Also, anyone know if I can get immich to upload the photos without... Running immich once in a while? Would be great if it just automatically sent them to "my cloud".

    Great software.

    • cbrews8 minutes ago
      If you can get all the images into a filesystem (on a NAS or similar server share), you can use the External Libraries feature in Immich (https://docs.immich.app/features/libraries/). This allows it to crunch through the media files via an async import job (a bit more reliable than having to directly upload via the web api).

      In my setup, I exclusively use the external libraries feature, pointed at a read-only share from my NAS mounted onto my Immich server. (The external libraries are set to resynchronize to the database every few hours). This means I can manage all my media assets myself without worrying about Immich accidentally corrupting them, and if I eventually move off Immich, I just have a single folder of media files organized by date to port around.

      The only downside is that I don't directly upload any media files directly to Immich, but that's okay. I have Syncopoli sync files from my phones (on a scheduled cadence) to an intermediary server which organizes and cleans exif data from media files before dropping it into its permanent home on my NAS share. No manual steps to get photos from my phone to my Immich instance!

    • conception44 minutes ago
      Just a quick note that native windows extract is 32bit and dies on archives gt 4gb. Use 7zip or something to extract in case you happen to be using that one.
    • altran1502an hour ago
      You can use this tool to get them into Immich, it will parse all the metadata and recreate albums as you have in GPhotos https://github.com/simulot/immich-go
    • etnoyan hour ago
      immich-go has what you need
  • DavideNL4 hours ago
    I don't want yet another self hosted service to manage (update, backups, possible hardware failures, energy costs, ups, etc.).

    Unfortunately Immich is not end-to-end encrypted. If that would have be the case i'd use https://pixelunion.eu/

    Seems like a great app though. So... i'm still pondering what to do :-)

    • FabCHan hour ago
      What do you mean Immich is not end-to-end encrypted? You control both ends, you can encrypt it any way you want…
      • olejorgenb16 minutes ago
        They said they only want to control one of the ends
    • mcsniff4 hours ago
      Okay? So don't use it, use a managed service like Google Photos, Apple Photos, Dropbox, etc where your photos and files might be arbitrarily removed or your access to them limited while they are scanned for disavowed content.

      You can also just use a secure transport layer (like WireGuard or a VPN) instead of relying on every project to implement end-to-end encryption.

    • brokensegue10 minutes ago
      it's really not much to manage assuming you are already doing backups. you ~ pay the energy cost either way.
    • amelius31 minutes ago
      > I don't want yet another self hosted service to manage

      Isn't system administration a solved problem now with LLMs? At least for these simple problem domains?

    • gonzalohm3 hours ago
      So if you don't want a self hosted service there are tons of cloud providers. Google photos, iCloud, etc. Some people don't want to pay a monthly fee to store their photos or don't want to risk losing something with sentimental value just because a company decides to ban you
    • tamimioan hour ago
      You can have immich on truenas that has the whole pool encrypted, same goes with opencloud for other docs/files. Plus all nas backup features, I think it’s a better approach than dealing with each app encryption.

      Edit: regarding cloud based backup, besides the usual privacy and security concerns, you can’t guarantee the fixed price, you might subscribe now and pay for a year, next year you have the typical “oops, operation cost are high we have to raise the prices or shutdown” blog post and now you’re stuck again, download, find another, upload, etc.

    • Jhsto4 hours ago
      You can use https://ente.com/ (it's open-source). It also makes the seemingly much better decision of storing photos in S3.
      • gonzalohm3 hours ago
        The point of Immich is self hosting. Using AWS defeats that purpose
        • jasonvorhe2 hours ago
          S3 has many open implementations you can self host. Some are quite lean even. Unless you need really complex IAM stuff it's a solid and rather simple experience to run it.
          • gonzalohm2 hours ago
            Yeah but Immich provides a lot more features than just storage
        • fragmede2 hours ago
          Perfect is the enemy of the good. While there's an ideal case where you're hosting it on a box in your house, that's not for everybody. So while hosting it on AWS doesn't remove every dependency on big tech, at least it's not a full on Google hosted SaaS product.
          • gonzalohm2 hours ago
            I think "perfect is the enemy of good" is actually an argument against AWS integration. Using S3 as a backend is a lot more complex than using local storage so it would take a lot more time to implement, that's why local storage is good enough
      • buster3 hours ago
        +1 for Ente. Replaced Google photos for me
    • jrm44 hours ago
      VPN (or other) Tunnel.

      That's the objective answer. There's no mystery here. That's exactly how you get what you want and it's not too hard. Not trying to dunk on you or anyone one but this is an easily solved problem, and I think I want to highlight it like this to make sure everyone understands.

      Anything web/internet/network service thing, you can add this on. This composability is important to remember in software, this even goes back to "The Unix Way" type stuff.

      • ravenstine2 hours ago
        It's also a kind of funny thing how HN has the attitude of "never implement your own encrypted anything" but then demand their apps build in e2e encryption. It may be one abstraction higher, but it's still fundamentally the same problem. With the unfortunate exception of web browsers, if I'm going to use something that performs encryption, then I want encryption to be the only job it has.
      • PhilipRomanan hour ago
        How are VPNs related to end-to-end encryption?
        • nicce14 minutes ago
          Their primary purpose is usually encrypt the connection between different endpoints… by creating virtual private networks…
      • tamimioan hour ago
        I believe OP meant at rest encryption, meaning, just because someone had an access to your physical drive doesn’t mean they can browse your pics.
    • slipperybeluga40 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • mopsi4 hours ago
    Does Immich support read-only source folders yet? I'd like to keep the original files intact, but allow Immich to index them.
    • zyberzero4 hours ago
      Yes, at least for a year. There is a ”external library” feature, I think that does what you want.
      • mopsi3 hours ago
        Thank you! That was not available the last time I checked.
        • bo0tzz2 hours ago
          It's been available for nearly three years
    • etnoyan hour ago
      Yes, using external libraries. It's been a feature for several years. Make it read-only by mounting docker compose read only
  • slipperybeluga44 minutes ago
    [dead]