Those users would be wise to back those files up if they consider them valuable intellectual property. If they're important enough that you'd miss them after a disk failure, then they should have been being backed up already.
It's hard to take any of what's written seriously, given that it's all AI generated. Did the user actually lose "valuable intellectual property", or did they tell claude to write as dire of a justification as possible?
Isn’t “Anthropic won’t fix it” a little sensational
It's editorializing and against HN guidelines either way.Ccrider is the one I use: https://github.com/neilberkman/ccrider
Session backups live outside of ~.claude so are not deleted and can be resumed.
I think it's more like, "We don't want our harness to need to be able to interpret every version of our conversation format indefinitely."
which makes anthropic on the whole a lot less trustworthy to have access to any machine