4 pointsby CarloLoopTheory2 hours ago7 comments
  • CarloLoopTheory20 minutes ago
    lol some dude calls me a mathematical crank because maths makes him panic, and my comments get flagged?

    this site is cooked

  • rawlingan hour ago
    > 33 pages. 100+ references. Full proofs. Self‑contained. A new mathematical object — and the foundation of the Carlo universe.

    AI?

    • CarloLoopTheoryan hour ago
      Dismissing something because you think it’s AI is just a shortcut for not having to evaluate it. If the argument’s weak, say why — guessing the author isn’t analysis.
      • symianan hour ago
        There is no obligation for others to evaluate the claims. The line quoted by the parent suggests that it was written by a mathematical crank. I doubt AI would make such an unecessary statement. This is not how serious mathematicians write.
        • rawlingan hour ago
          I can't wait to read more about the Big Daddy Engine

          > Capabilities of the Big Daddy Engine include: forcing spacetime to emerge generating matter from contradictions deriving constants of nature

          • CarloLoopTheoryan hour ago
            Repeating the capabilities like a punchline only works if you can explain why they’re wrong. Otherwise you’re just reading aloud
        • CarloLoopTheoryan hour ago
          [flagged]
  • jamesl67an hour ago
    Scrolling through this and figured I’d leave a note, curious what people end up saying about it.
  • whosthatmiracle39 minutes ago
    This actually makes sense though
    • CarloLoopTheory35 minutes ago
      makes sense when you just read it instead of projecting your own insecurities, like the other dudes lol
      • CarloLoopTheory33 minutes ago
        like calling a cavemean a rock crank because he discovered fire and you didnt
  • CarloLoopTheory2 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • CarloLoopTheory2 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • CarloLoopTheory2 hours ago
    [flagged]