Of course they did, however we need to document this and build a book of cases as it should be looked at in a broader context. In other words, at some point this is a hostile action, and not only 'lobbying'.

if this is not illegal, it should be

Thank you for sharing this. It's important to document these cases because of widespread censorship. I'm sure this is only scratching the surface as Israeli officials would have denied it ever happening if that was all to it. Instead, a "no comment" response generally means there much more to comment on.

I challenge the idea that social media has been a platform for people against the genocidal actions of Israel; a safe platform for Palestinian activists. However, things like this clearly show that Meta favors Israeli interests. Also, while many people claim that the photos and video available help make the case of genocide, the process is still ongoing. It's likely that social media, despite all the photo and video evidence, actually spread misinformation and prevented communicating the human rights disasters.