On the other hand I can’t say I find her top photos for casual sex to be that attractive though from a mimetic perspective I could recognize that other people would rate them highly.
And that's completely ignoring the fact that how much you like a person directly affects how physically attractive they appear to you.
Also, speaking personally as an older man, I have always tended to find women roughly my age to be the most attractive, regardless of what my age was. It's no less true now than it was when I was in my 20s.
This book goes to the heard of what is wrong with that whole evpsych approach
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_l%27amour_(Stendhal)
which reveals a whole inner psychology which can enrich our lives but that I think a lot of people are closed off to. If I am working with someone who's attractive but a little annoying I might cultivate a crush on them because then I'm not annoyed anymore.
That's lady's whole problem is that she casts such a wide net and considers so many options whereas when you fall in love with somebody that person seems absolutely singular, at least in that limerent phrase that Stendhal calls "crystallization". The more people she considers the more certain it is that they'll all fall short and she can't get it because
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/21810-it-is-difficult-to-ge...
Stendhal makes polyamory seem like a delightful aristocratic game whereas those rationalists in the bay area make it seem like a stressful chore that you need a technical dictionary to talk about.