> Alarmingly, this mistrial order is just the latest example of attacks on the Prairieland Defendants’ constitutional rights to access to counsel, a fair and impartial jury, an adequate defense, a public trial, and more. Judge Pittman has made highly unusual moves that suppress defense teams and which federal lawyers have not seen during their entire careers:
[...]
> NLG remains extremely concerned about these cases. Defendants’ First Amendment rights to free expression, assembly, and association; their Sixth Amendment rights to counsel; their Fifth Amendment rights to a public trial; and their Second Amendment rights to bear arms are under attack in North Texas. If unchecked and ignored, this case and the judicial decisions coming from it will set a very dark precedent for the rest of the country.
https://www.ngocomment.com/p/breaking-exclusive-north-texas-...
> Ngo lobbied the administration to name “antifa” a foreign terrorist organization — on par with al Qeada or ISIS — at a White House event in the fall.
https://bsky.app/profile/hannahgais.bsky.social/post/3moyib6...
Used to think he was a kind of harmless idiot, but this is incredibly actively bad & toxic a person.
What is a proportionate sentence for convictions like these? In other words, is there a norm when looking at similar convictions?
Body: "material support for terrorists, attempted murder, possession and conspiracy to use explosives"
Um?
Even the part that sounds the worst if you take it out of context, was not a murder or even failed attempted murder, but the successful prevention of a murder.
Tampering with evidence is a serious crime. I suppose you think that Trump's mishandling of classified information was just "moving a box of documents", too?
1. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/antifa-cell-members-convicted...
That was the question you were asked. It was a short comment with very few big words. Why are you talking about whether it’s a crime? Why the rank dishonesty?
Is it too hard a question for you to figure out how to answer?