24 pointsby adamraudonis5 hours ago6 comments
  • TheChaplain30 minutes ago
    IMHO there is little point of these conversion projects. It screams of "look at me, see what I made" and when the attention goes down a little nothing was ever pushed to the repo ever again.

    Perhaps I am out of touch, but a project with author/s that have passion for every line, function and purpose, feels more real and worth my trust to spend time using it.

    • bravetraveler8 minutes ago
      I'd go even further: 'look at me, see what I paid for'.

      This isn't much different than the 'builder brained' coworker who is obsessed with creating technical debt, not owning it. Throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks, passing it off as sage wisdom.

      • dgellow5 minutes ago
        In this case, it’s maybe more “I can access that luxurious model you all pleb are banned from using”
    • tuna743 minutes ago
      Using less electricity or time for the same result seems a pretty good point.
    • xnickb29 minutes ago
      I don't think you are. My first reaction was: "cool, now maintain it"
      • 18 minutes ago
        undefined
  • monax5 minutes ago
    *look inside* > ruff
  • ma2kx3 hours ago
    > A Rust reimplementation of pylint that produces byte-for-byte identical output — 15–2300× faster (median ~85×).

    > prylint is not "inspired by" pylint. [...] Where pylint has bugs, prylint reproduces them. Where pylint crashes, prylint reports the same crash message.

    This looks very strange to me. There's no paper or explanation as to why the output should be identical to the real Pylint. Looking at GitHub, all the commits are by Claude, and otherwise, adamraudonis doesn't seem to have any connection to anyone else.

    I don't want to accuse anyone of anything unjustly, but this post seems more like a kind of malware SEO. Is this project legit?

    • QuantumNomad_31 minutes ago
      > There's no paper or explanation as to why the output should be identical to the real Pylint.

      To be a drop-in replacement?

    • adastra2232 minutes ago
      > There's no paper or explanation as to why the output should be identical to the real Pylint.

      Because that was the prompt they used. Seems par for the course with vibe coded projects.

  • Hamuko43 minutes ago
    So basically `ruff check --select=PL` but worse in every single way, maintained by a system that's not even available anymore? It even uses Ruff's code under the surface.
  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • pbgcp2026an hour ago
    ... and Mythos just found 10k of zero-days. Dept of trading issued an order to restrict foreigners access to PyLint. /s