Pentagon boasts of using AI to write reports mandated by Congress (1.5mil users)(arstechnica.com)
50 pointsby FrustratedMonky2 hours ago10 comments
  • dbvnan hour ago
    The reports will be just as useless as they were before
  • dnw7 minutes ago
    Similar to Paperwork Reduction Act, we may need Slop Reduction Act.
  • 2 hours ago
    undefined
  • FrustratedMonky2 hours ago
    The shocking part of the story is the scale.

    1.5 Million Users just within the Pentagon?

    "The Pentagon has made AI tools, starting with Google Cloud’s Gemini for Government, widely available to members of all six military branches through the department’s bespoke GenAI.mil platform since December 2025."

    "The number of Department of Defense personnel using commercial AI tools such as Gemini through GenAI.mil has significantly increased from just 80,000 in December 2025 to 1.5 million in June 2026, the Pentagon CTO claimed during his remarks at the Hudson Institute."

    • not_a_bot_4sho2 hours ago
      "The Department of Defense is the country’s largest employer, with more than 2.1 million Military Service members and over 811 thousand civilian employees."

      From https://comptroller.war.gov/Portals/45/Documents/afr/fy2024/...

      • tananaev2 hours ago
        Presumably the whole point of AI is that we can start reducing that number. I am sure there's a significant number of people just working on various administrative tasks processing data and documents.
        • thatguy0900an hour ago
          That's exactly what I want from the Pentagon, less real humans involved and more automated systems that don't even have the concept of morality and the social responsibility to be a potential whistleblower
    • BurningFrogan hour ago
      Everyone is starting to use AI. I use three AIs daily. Why would the US military be different?
      • FrustratedMonkyan hour ago
        I think, assume. With the Military, with the goal of killing people, that there is assumption of more human judgment being involved. Beyond even the issue of a man-in-the-loop for targeting systems. But even generally, that these are big decisions that shouldn't be farmed out completely.
      • otikikan hour ago
        Well, you are not the Pentagon.

        I presume they might view their internal data being used to train a private company's training sets as a concern.

        • ribosometronome39 minutes ago
          There are a solutions, like Amazon Bedrock, that allow model usage with strict data control.
      • vitally364339 minutes ago
        How many of your tasks decide whether entire populations of human beings live or die?
  • josefritzishere2 hours ago
    AI slop reports from lazy, incompetent leaders? I'm shocked!
    • CGMthrowaway42 minutes ago
      Half of those leaders are Democrats. They're not all lazy and incompetent.
  • tancopan hour ago
    [dead]
  • FrustratedMonky2 hours ago
    Literally on the timeline for AI-2027.

    https://ai-2027.com/

    <edit> AI-2027, not Project 2027

    • cyanydeez2 hours ago
      ok, first, this isn't superhuman AI; this is slop production at scale. we could do these with markov chains decades ago.

      The only difference now is the slop looks critically better, but there's no quality accounting.

      • FrustratedMonky26 minutes ago
        In AI-2027, there are many stages before superhuman AI. Military dependence on AI was one of them. This dependence creates incentive to do anything to not slow down, including ignoring any safety concerns.
    • FrustratedMonky2 hours ago
      Not sure why the downvote.

      Part of AI-2027, one of the early steps, was government dependance on AI for routine jobs. They become dependent on AI, and thus less willing to slow down or put on any guard rails. Because they can't live without it, they keep accelerating.

      • lelandfean hour ago
        Likely because they said Project 2027 which is something different
        • FrustratedMonkyan hour ago
          Did not realize there was a follow on to Project 2025, called 2027.
          • lelandfean hour ago
            evokes something different/doesn't exist

            At minimum that link does not describe a project and does not use that Proper Noun

  • htx80nerd25 minutes ago
    if any (D) President did the same thing there would be 250 comments talking about how amazing this is. a true step into our future, etc. (R) man bad. everything (R) man does is bad. I know this cuz the Media and Experts tell me!
    • advisedwang5 minutes ago
      You are getting mad at something you made up yourself
  • defmetrix2 hours ago
    I have no problem with this. If the AI has access to the funding and schedule data, it will probably give a more honest answer that the humans. And in reality, nobody in congress is going to take the time to read the report anyways. They will just vote the way they are told.
    • FatherOfCurses2 hours ago
      You're assuming the AI will not be given any instructions to produce the report with a certain data bias.
    • cyanydeez2 hours ago
      Me either, bullshit vs bullshit AI is exactly the same. It's not like this administration was going to produce anything of merit anyway, so why not just go as quickly as possible to the bullshit instead of this 2weeks song and dance.
  • arjie28 minutes ago
    This is wonderful. Many of these reports are makework paperwork. One even wonders if pushing for them is just taking a page from the CIA Sabotage Manual and applying it to us. Considering Congress members barely read the bills they’re voting on, it’s probably insignificant that this pointless paperwork is dispensed with.

    When we finally end Environmental Impact Reports by generating them at scale with AI we will finally be able to escape this plateau of ossification.

    I’m not particularly attached to bullshit being manufactured by human minds.

    • advisedwang7 minutes ago
      If these reports truly are so bad, the law should be changed to stop requiring them. But, lawmakers aren't choosing to do that. Maybe there's actually some good reasons for them to exist.
    • pstuart12 minutes ago
      > Considering Congress members barely read the bills they’re voting on

      That seems like a good opportunity for AI to be used as a summary.

      And on other fun note, in many cases Congress does not even write the bill, their patrons do and have them pretend to represent it.