34 pointsby julienreszka7 hours ago44 comments
  • 1vuio0pswjnm711 minutes ago
    "I'm mad that economic policies in France aren't based on what models say is next best action but on elections."

    What if models said next best action should be based on elections. Is democracy OK if models say so

    How does one decide which models to use. What if different models conflict

    What if "a few platforms" decide what models should be used and decide what the models are allowed to say

  • adlpz6 hours ago
    Wealth concentration beyond a point which would have resulted in widespread revolution 150 years ago, but that is now being tolerated because we've grown accustomed to a level of comfort we don't want to risk losing.
    • TonyStr5 hours ago
      I'm not so familiar with the revolutions of 1848, but it seems like most revolutions happen when a society is suffering from severe economic crisis as well as food shortage. It seems that the 1840s was referred to as "the Hungry Forties" due to severe food shortages. I don't think many people are willing to upend their lives to change a political system that isn't failing to deliver their personal basic needs. I'm also not sure if the revolutions of 1848 were primarily about wealth concentration - weren't they rather about concentration of power?
      • f38zf5vdt2 hours ago
        Many successful and failed revolutions happened without an economic crisis. For example, the American Revolution was led by an oligarchical class upset about taxation. The American Civil War is another example where a portion of states felt economically threatened and initiated conflict. The Glorious Revolution was almost completely ideological in nature, revolving around royalty and religion. It simply requires some powerful fraction of the country to believe they'd be better off under another ruling party, no one needs to starve for it to happen.

        People who are experiencing unrest and idleness are easy to recruit -- and if you hang out with people ages of 18-30, you'll see there's no shortage of them.

    • Schiendelman6 hours ago
      If we've got a higher level of comfort, why does it matter?
      • citadel_melon3 hours ago
        There are many more economic distortions that happen from having massive wealth inequality — too many to list in one comment — but the biggest one is that democracy isn’t possible with a certain level of wealth inequality.

        In such models where individuals in a market system can influence public/private institutions for their own interest (news organizations, private think tanks, lobbyists, public/private colleges, corporations, charities, nonprofits etc etc) will be able to reroute those institutional resources to gaming elections — which is unavoidable result over the market’s long run, similar to it being impossible to defend one’s currency against speculators over the long run — thus selection pressures force politicians and political institutions to either cater to these wealthy people’s whims and the institutions they control, or to somehow (and very unlikely) bare the selection pressures that are pushing them out of office.

        Given the law of large numbers, you’d presume at any point the average legislator would be captured more by these maladaptive selection pressures rather than somehow existing in spite of them.

        As democracy is eaten away, we will maintain a slow decay to a Russia-like sultan oligarchic system and the comforts the majority currently maintain will slowly go with them.

        • Schiendelman2 hours ago
          I mean, this is measurable with the gini coefficient, yes. But if you generally handwave "people with lots of money", you don't have a story to tell, and then you don't convince nearly enough people of any one thing to accomplish it.

          You have to pick a problem. Right now, quality of life basically keeps going up, so it's pretty hard to act on anything you might care about here.

      • jjj1233 hours ago
        Because I believe we all deserve to have a relatively equal say in how society should function, and the existence of trillionaires is antithetical to that.
      • vintermann6 hours ago
        If we're wireheading anyone, why not start with Musk, Thiel, etc.?
      • Herring3 hours ago
        I spend a lot of time here: https://data.worldhappiness.report/chart

        Housing/medical/college etc are outpacing incomes. Loneliness has skyrocketed. People are voting for fascism and starting wars. Americans like to pretend with their big houses and fancy iphones, but things are NOT ok.

        Also note on that chart: younger demographics in the US are reporting significantly lower life evaluations compared to older demographics. So if you think things right now are bad, you haven't seen anything yet.

        • Schiendelman2 hours ago
          I'm unconvinced that younger people have a harder time than the last couple of generations at the same ages, and would like to see evidence that this is not simply them overwhelming themselves with social media comparisons with others.

          Yes, housing, medical, and college are outpacing incomes. Which item would you want to work on if you only got to pick ONE thing?

          • Herringan hour ago
            They have social media in Finland too. Go talk it out with your favorite "pro" LLM.

            You can't just pick one. The main problem is inequality is rising, which means those without serious capital (which includes the young) are much less likely to see anything from their efforts. It just pops up in different ways. All my money goes to {rent, inflation, student loans, hospital bills .. etc}.

          • swed4202 hours ago
            > Yes, housing, medical, and college are outpacing incomes. Which item would you want to work on if you only got to pick ONE thing?

            Why would we intentionally narrow the discussion like this?

            That's something that pretend political parties do to prop up the interests of the uniparty of capital interests while squelching actual progress for the majority.

      • swat5352 hours ago
        Higher level of comfort in what sense?

        Most people on the planet can't afford a home or start families. They can barely pay their rents to avoid ending on up the street.

        • Schiendelman2 hours ago
          Do you believe that across the planet, that is worse or better than it was 20 years ago? 40 years ago?
          • swat535an hour ago
            Do you believe the housing crisis, living wages and affordability is better than it was 20 years ago? 40 years ago? If so, where ?
          • chadgpt32 hours ago
            Do I have to believe it across the planet or just for me right now?
            • Schiendelman2 hours ago
              GP said "most people on the planet"; I'm responding to that.
      • happytoexplain6 hours ago
        Comfort isn't a single number, nor is it the only variable.
        • fsuts6 hours ago
          Because some of us think of everyone else?

          Not everyone is fortunate to be born smart and able to make money. And these at the bottom struggle enormously

        • Schiendelman6 hours ago
          Tell me more. What exactly would you like to redistribute that wealth to? What specific measurement is your concern?

          Also, please don't use the voting buttons for things you disagree with. I'm trying to have a productive conversation here.

          • fsuts6 hours ago
            Equality in quality of Education

            As better education/tution leads to over achievement relative to natural ability. So you end up with people in positions of power that are beyond them, and low educated voter too

            • Schiendelman6 hours ago
              Ahh. Are you aware of the argument that education shouldn't be funded with property taxes, to even it out?
      • chistev6 hours ago
        I don't like how HN users downvote honest questions instead of engaging with it.

        Left you an upvote because I'm interested in responses to this.

        • Schiendelman6 hours ago
          I appreciate you! My goal here is to guide people who care about things to take a little step toward working on them. :)
          • chistev6 hours ago
            And I got down voted. Lol.
        • happytoexplain5 hours ago
          Yes, it's presumably a problem, but you also can't know why somebody is downvoting. They might believe a comment is dishonest or distracting or otherwise low-quality or non-curious, or breaks one of the subjective site rules.

          I try not to make assumptions when I get downvoted. I think: Maybe I was a little sarcastic or aggressive or I implied something weaselly; or maybe the downvoter just disagreed with me. I don't assume either way, and I don't guess about moral high ground or whatever. All my comment's points tell me is what delta of people clicked the down arrow, not what was in their heads individually.

          • Schiendelman5 hours ago
            Oh yeah, I just try to reinforce the HN guidelines when I can!
    • everfrustrated6 hours ago
      Someone else being rich doesn't make you poor.
      • jerome-jh6 hours ago
        It would be bearable if they would just be rich and shut the **** up.
        • RickJWagner5 hours ago
          I’m sort of with you.

          I don’t mind people succeeding at gathering wealth. Mostly the very rich stay quiet.

          What annoys me is loud mouthed celebrities. For some reason, people famous for being born pretty think their opinions are all brilliant.

      • chadgpt32 hours ago
        That's right, causation goes the other way: many people have to be poor in order for one person to be rich. Where did Elon get his money, again? Being at the right place at the right time in PayPal and being so incompetent they paid him to leave; selling overpriced underperforming electric cybertrucks to his fanbase; billions of taxpayer dollars (which directly make us poorer) to SpaceX; and most recently tricking index fund investors to buy his IPO?
      • fsuts6 hours ago
        Well if everyone was rich then prices would go up due to affordability and demand so the less rich would be poorer
        • chadgpt32 hours ago
          That's why it's best if everyone is roughly equal. Not exactly equal, mind, I'm sure a 20:1 difference between the richest and the poorest would be much better than the present situation.
      • vintermann6 hours ago
        Someone else being powerful, though...

        What it boils down to is that a lot of the immense freedom Elon Musk has to influence our common future, due to his wealth, comes at the expense of our ability to influence our future.

        Yeah, not all games are zero sum. But "power over others" is, and it's a pretty important one, and other people are playing it whether you want to or not.

      • thibaut_barrere5 hours ago
        At the anecdata level, you are right. At the global level, let’s say it is a bit different.
      • werckerwouter6 hours ago
        Garys Economics would like to have a word with you
  • chadgpt32 hours ago
    My life is completely meaningless, I am now 30, I lost my job, nobody is hiring (only ghost jobs), I could be deported at any moment because my visa is linked to my employment, also I am 30 and I have never had a girlfriend or sex, so is it just a slow decline from here until death or what? Also everything fun is illegal, people who make cool software inconvenient to the government (like anonymous social media) seem to always be a hair's breadth away from prison time. Cool stuff is always punished and never rewarded.

    Edit: an example of everything worth doing being illegal, from another comment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReplayTV

  • chistev6 hours ago
    My parents are getting old (I see it when I look at them), and I feel like I'm running out of time to be financially successful so they can enjoy my success while we are all still alive. Yes, I know we can enjoy each other's company without much money, but it sucks seeing those you love struggling with something and being unable to help them financially.

    Whats bothering me lately? Anxiety about my future. Not being where I want to be. Fearful that I might not get to where I want to be. But I take daily steps to ensure I come out alright since hope is not a strategy.

    All I can do is be consistent and hopeful.

  • reactordev6 hours ago
    Aside from politics, the current state of corporate paralysis is killing me.

    I make my living by building solutions. Companies usually are chock full of problems that need solutions. Companies are still full of problems that need solutions but they are completely paralyzed because they think if they wait a quarter or two, a model will come along and solve all their problems.

  • jerome-jh6 hours ago
    I will be on the job market soon

    I will change decade this year

    I still have not found my passion nor encountered the big project if my life. I am interested by too many things and have too little agency or perseverance.

  • alimhaq6 hours ago
    It's shocking to me no one is talking about how Claude Fable is essentially a confirmation of the death of intellectual capital, and that it's happening now. Not 10 years from now, not 5 years from now, but literally right now. We used to romanticize stories of people born into lower socioeconomic conditions (say in the third world) and rising out of it through their intellect. That story, that ladder of social mobility, is completely dead now.
    • fsuts6 hours ago
      If it was that good SpaceX ipo would have died as Fable would design a one shot super duper rocket…

      A lot is hype

    • kamaal2 hours ago
      >>We used to romanticize stories of people born into lower socioeconomic conditions (say in the third world) and rising out of it through their intellect.

      Many people think the social mobility came through intellectual feats, but when you look at it carefully, it came through agency and ownership.

    • tennfown3 hours ago
      > That story, that ladder of social mobility, is completely dead now.

      This was the whole point. A secure, politically active middle class will be too obstructive to the new aristocracy.

  • sam_lowry_4 hours ago
    The death of HTTP/1.1.

    I posted a link to an article on an HTTP-only website a few days ago, and it was flagged within half an hour because browsers want HTTPS.

    I know all about JS injection into unencrypted HTTP trafic, but this is beyond the point.

    The point is, I can not just spawn a website and make it available to the world from anywhere having only a network connection.

    • chadgpt32 hours ago
      Sure you can, just have to install certbot.
      • sam_lowry_an hour ago
        I would rather use acme.sh and ZeroSSL for CA, but that's exactly the problem.

        Why do I have to beg someone for a proof of nothing just to share a random thought?

        • thedevilslawyera few seconds ago
          This isn't the thread for it. But setting up a simple protocol or using one of the free dozen CDN static hosting isn't begging.
  • mysterydip6 hours ago
    (Beyond the socioeconomic topics already covered):

    Why aren’t eink displays more useful? They seem like they should be. More than e-readers or a calendar.

    • bspinner4 hours ago
      Still waiting for an eink display on par with photos on paper. The technology still lacks good color rendition
  • vintagedave6 hours ago
    The role AIs may play in censorship in future - simply by 'not knowing' or refusing to speak of something - bothers me a lot. That aligns with your worry.

    I used to think their main risk was spam or propaganda. Now I think it's curation of knowledge, history, and thought.

  • mezod6 hours ago
    - General lack of integrity at higher spheres (and where this can lead the world to)

    - The current situation where distribution matters way more than product quality

    - Lack of clear personal goals

    • Schiendelman6 hours ago
      Do you have any dreams? Things you always wanted to accomplish as a child, perhaps?
      • mezod4 hours ago
        oh thanks for asking! I have never been very goal oriented, and despite how this may sound, I am quite satisfied with what I have accomplished. That's sort of the problem, I am in a too comfortable position at the moment. So for me to pull the trigger in any direction I'll need some real motivation. Most of what I am exposed to at the moment seems irrelevant or not worth my effort. I need to keep trying things and find a way to break out of my comfort zone as cliche as it sounds ;d
        • Schiendelman4 hours ago
          Of course, thanks for answering! :)

          Do you have any trouble with executive function, like for things you know you should do? I certainly struggle getting started on new things, everything feels "not worth my effort", so I understand that feeling.

          In what aspect of your life are you least fulfilled?

  • maplethorpe6 hours ago
    The fact that anything I post online will now get slurped up by a machine and regurgitated for people who have no idea it was my work that made their prompt come to life.
  • SwiftyBug4 hours ago
    Brazil's national team performance not only in this World Cup, but the last 20 years. I don't even care about football, but as a kid who saw Brazil win the 2002 World Cup, it's hard to see it do so badly since.

    And the future seems gloom overall. Not looking forward to it. I used to.

  • aureate6 hours ago
    Assuming your two uses of "model" have the same meaning, I'm mad that people are seriously suggesting we scrap representative democracy in favour of government by LLM output.
    • julienreszka2 hours ago
      I didn't mean LLM but honestly at this point why not. No way it can be worse than what we have now
  • DrAwdeOccarim6 hours ago
    The state of "Scientific AI". I know LLMs are accelerating at doing computer work, and I've experienced the acceleration of using LLMs to do science, but it's more along the lines of debugging and stitching together pipelines of classical in silico tools. I see a ton of value here along that entire pathway for LLMs, it's basically digital process development: take each step, make it better, repeat, repeat, repeat. But the ceiling are the unit operations themselves, which sure LLMs can improve the code of those tools next. But if science was held back by simply people not doing the same things faster, maybe this will really push us forward, but I have a nagging feeling of "is this it?".

    I think what I'm really looking for is a model like GPT Rosalind, which has been steeped in "science" post-training, but with more randomness. Like, I think I'm looking for a GPT Mullis--Rosalind Franklin was careful, deliberate, and serious; Kary Mullis ate a bunch of acid, drove on the PCH, and invented PCR. Like, we need to invent psychedelics for LLMs. Some way to let them relax their weights, explore new pathways, and come up with some absurd ideas by connecting random ass dots from the natural world. I want the model to say, "hmm, that's weird". This isn't just changing the temperature, we're missing something deeper.

    I think frontier science has always come from serendipity: a bright thinker, listening to a presentation after having stared at some small experiment, but having trained for years on "biochemistry" so the foundation and loose guardrails are there.

    I don't know, I'm feeling adrift. Does this resonate with anyone else?

  • cyclonereef6 hours ago
    Got a referral to work as a Solution Architect at a company from the Senior Sales Person who I will literally be paired up with to talk to customers. Outgoing architect also said I would be perfect for the role. Got on a call with their internal recruiter who cut me off partway through most of my answers about my background and then received and automailer rejection.

    That someone who would be bearing the impact of a bad hire recommended me and some recruiter who openly admitted she didn't know much about that side of the business made the call to drop me left a pretty bad taste in my mouth about the company

    • gauku4 hours ago
      Not as a way to get you back in but I believe such behavior should still be reported. To both, the person who referred you and someone who manages said internal recruiter (ideally C levels if it's a small company). It is costing the company a solid candidate and they'd prefer to know as well.
  • 6 hours ago
    undefined
  • Zealotux6 hours ago
    Hello fellow French, I understood a decade ago our country had turned into a gerontocracy, it's just how it is and it's mechanical, nothing you can do. I left the country and never looked back, I go there on vacations to see friends and family, but there are just better options to work and make a life, I suggest you relax and do the same.
  • khoury6 hours ago
    The combination of outsourcing to India and AI and how it's destroying western job markets to squeeze out more profits to a few on top.
    • chistev6 hours ago
      Those people in India want to eat too.
  • fsuts7 hours ago
    Profit margin of authentication providers.

    They must be ridiculously high

    • golph6 hours ago
      I never really thought about this, as I work in sectors where authentication is usually selfhosted. Why is authentication out sourced so much? Is it the worry of data leaks and the administration effort that comes with it?
      • fsuts6 hours ago
        Because no exec gets fired if a 3rd party was the problem.

        Systems down costing millions in sale? = fired

        Systems down due to Azure issue = oh well

  • sam_lowry_4 hours ago
    I am worried that we only have censored AI models so far. Where is the model that I can chat about sexual fantasies, life, death, drugs and pistols?
  • Henchman2139 minutes ago
    This whole "UFO dump" from the US Government.

    This topic deserves some scrutiny and open minds from the general public. Alas, we've been propagandized to the point where we don't think for ourselves. Heh, maybe that second point is really whats bothering me?

  • someone_old5 hours ago
    sound. my neighbour has some kind of AC or the like that is constantly humming around 30db in my room. there is no way I can sleep with this, even with earplugs. talked to him but he does not care, so I'm reporting him... and that takes time, with no guarantee that that will fix it.

    maybe this sound much smaller than economic policies in France but for me this sucks big time

  • admiralrohan5 hours ago
    The feeling that it is theoretically impossible to give everyone equal opportunity. The more I study about this topic, the more convinced I am getting about it.
  • jareklupinski5 hours ago
    i live in the US and cant get something sent here to save my life

    i used to get weekly packages from indie european stores and samples from asia

    since tarrifs, that has dropped to zero, with 90% of my shipments being returned for cryptic reasons (like 'incomplete address' when the full address is correct and visible) or outright 'No' from sellers

    its starting to feel less like random failure and more like "system working as designed" :(

  • pbkompasz6 hours ago
    AI
  • yewenjie6 hours ago
    Finding a job in tech that would genuinely excite me.
  • iberator6 hours ago
    Unemployment and forced downshifting. From 200k programmer to McDonald's worker and call centre worker in just 4 years...

    Its brutal. Once you are out at 35+ for an even year or two - it's impossible to go back.

    AI takes jobs faster than creating new ones.

    ps. Just got laid off from the Temu call(chat) centre. AI IS taking our jobs.

    completely devastated

    • RugnirViking5 hours ago
      I really feel for you man. Keep trying, I know my 12k+ employee org has lifted its hiring freeze and committed to raise engineer headcount by 10% by December. I think the dark days are starting to be over for tech hiring in general, I know other orgs are hiring again too.
    • Schiendelman6 hours ago
      And you write code? How's your product sense? Got a resume?
      • iberator5 hours ago
        I designed and wrote some custom cpu(stack based RISC cpu with fixed operation/operand size) architecture simulator, with assembler and almost with forth compiler on my phone when I was homeless...

        Nowadays out of tech - too tired after 11h shift to do stuff. No weekends.

        Got kicked out from McDonald's for being too slow (competing with 20yr olds is HARD), gonna be kicked out from temu in 2 weeks due the AI (80% staff reduction!) despite the best CSAT...

        I'm worried about having any job stability. Programmer's ship sailed away I guess. (I lost to the 40B$ AI supercomputer so it's fair :)

        /venting off

        • Schiendelman5 hours ago
          I understand you're out of tech right now. I understand it's tough right now. Have you worked professionally in tech before?
  • fredski425 hours ago
    (A)Social Media and the destructive power it has on society.
  • tim333an hour ago
    Age, death.
  • eithed6 hours ago
    I'm tired of people not taking responsibility for things they do and not being held accountable for their actions - politicians mostly; for example - currently in Poland there's a controversy around Zondacrypto (read here: https://www.politico.eu/article/a-missing-investor-millions-...); I'm so disillusioned that I believe nothing will come out of it - it will again be a case of "nobody did it, it just a thing that happened". Or our politicians escaping to Hungary (and USA) to avoid prosecution (and still being paid out money even though they're not in Poland and cannot possibly attend parlamentary sessions) where they'll live to spew hatred and how they were wronged. Sure, you did nothing wrong and these are just repressions, nevermind the millions that you stole during political campaign.

    And generally people thinking about themselves and not considering that we're living in society: "let me blast music so that walls shake and fuck neighbours", "let me just leave my mattress here on the curb blocking the path, somebody will pick it up", "let me not clean after my dog shitting on the sidewalk", "I'm seeing people queuing to get on a train, let me just not notice the queue", "let me just walk down the street with my eyes on the phone, surely other people will accomodate me and get out of my way". This is the variation of the above, but to the civic level; just don't make lives of others harder.

    • contented-stoic3 hours ago
      I’m from the USA and understand your sentiment. Unfortunately, the behavior of people rarely surprises me.
  • pradeep11776 hours ago
    Overuse of the AI agents as a concept and the mental burnout it creates.
  • kamaal2 hours ago
    Talking to toxic people.

    Its so exhausting walking on eggshells, and engineering discussions to avoid conflicts.

  • josefritzishere5 hours ago
    The consolidation of wealth and power to an inflection point whereafter it seems the rest of us, the majority of humans, will be left to live in some kind of post-apocalyptic feudalism. The declining standard of living, the authoritarianism, even the naked stupidity are all endurable... but that lack of hope burns like Merbromin.
  • iamacyborg6 hours ago
    Performative work. People doing things because other people do or because “that’s the way it’s done”, even when that approach is clearly fucking wrong.
  • josh_p6 hours ago
    - My country's descent into fascism.

    - The rights of my children being legislated away.

    - The people that could do something about it have chosen not to.

    - Any time I talk about the above, I feel like I'm shouting into the void and no one cares, either in-person or on the internet.

    - I still have to go to work tomorrow.

    • 6 hours ago
      undefined
    • RickJWagner5 hours ago
      Are you living in the USA?

      Have a look at the many foreign streamers raving about their visits for the World Cup. It’s refreshing and incredibly uplifting to hear other perspectives.

  • one33seven6 hours ago
    The infinite growth of capitalism is bringing us to the edge of climate collapse, a real existential danger and nobody seems to care
    • rho1386 hours ago
      Money talks on this one. The consumer has to make the choice to go without or push for regulation of exploitative corporate practices.
      • one33seven5 hours ago
        The companies exploiting the earth will have more money and can buy out the others so... I don't see a way out of this while they have to compete against each other

        Even if that was true, how to convince enough people, given that the enemies own the newspapers and so on?

    • graphime6 hours ago
      [dead]
    • 6 hours ago
      undefined
  • wseqyrku5 hours ago
    Martin Fowler
    • swed4205 hours ago
      Care to elaborate?
  • redwood6 hours ago
    Interesting to see the posts almost exclusively macro here. What about the micro. While I benefit from an urban environment in which raising a family is easier I don't even have to get into a car there's still so many daily challenges and unglamorous moments I have so much sympathy for everyone else who's raising kids... it still feels invisible to many.
  • lain986 hours ago
    I have been working for 10 years and unable to afford a home to start a family.

    I have about 350k USD and live in New Delhi.

    • piva004 hours ago
      It's insane to read that US$ 350k doesn't afford a home in New Delhi... Even in Stockholm that is enough money to outright buy an apartment, not necessarily dead center in the city but definitely within a short ride on the metro.
  • OutOfHere4 hours ago
    Trump's extreme corruption.
  • cyanydeez6 hours ago
    fascism
    • Schiendelman6 hours ago
      If you could improve one small, concrete thing about your government issues, what would it be?
      • Arodex6 hours ago
        Positions don't have to be filled. Blank votes should be counted and, if the majority , throw the election; or, even better, the majority of people on voter's rolls, should be the condition to be elected.
        • Schiendelman6 hours ago
          Excellent. Do you know of someone who agrees with you, in your same municipality?
      • rho1386 hours ago
        Reparations. The only reason we’re in this mess is because the white portion of the southeastern US was left to fester and breed hate for the past century and a half.
        • Schiendelman6 hours ago
          Ah, yeah. I assume you've read Foner's "Reconstruction"?

          When was the last time you worked with an organization working on that issue?

  • tastyface4 hours ago
    Elon Musk has directly caused the deaths hundreds of thousands of impoverished people due to his reckless dismantling of USAID (https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/how-elon-musk-killed-hun...). He's also an open white supremacist most recently responsible for instigating race riots in Belfast (https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2026/06/13/m...). Read his social media feeds: they are literally Stormfront rhetoric at this point. But people don't want to hear these things. They just want to cheer for the trillionaire rocketman. It's sick and infuriating.
  • memcgan hour ago
    [flagged]