7 pointsby dwa35923 hours ago4 comments
  • rationalist2 hours ago
    It's not cash sitting in an account. It's completely meaningless and just used as a political lever IMO.

    He didn't steal $120+ from every person on earth, he created a trillion in "value".

    We aren't poorer for Tesla and SpaceX existing.

    For what it's worth: I have no financial interest with any of his companies or own any of their products. I feel like I'm neutral third party.

    So how do I feel? No different than before he was a "trillionaire".

  • drob5183 hours ago
    IMO, Elon is this century's Howard Hughes.
    • MrGrinchh3 hours ago
      Kinda, other than the fact that Elon musk has fourteen children and Howard Hughes had zero.
    • dotcoma3 hours ago
      And this century’s Charles Ponzi.
  • root-parent3 hours ago
    "Bill Gates accuses Elon Musk of killing poor children by cutting foreign aid" - https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/bill-gates-accuses-elon...
    • dwa35923 hours ago
      I wonder if there is any evidence linking the ebola outbreak to the reduction in aid.
      • 2 hours ago
        undefined
    • robberat73 hours ago
      alternate title : Trillionaire cuts millions in funding for poor people.
  • rvz3 hours ago
    Would you rather:

    A: Have $100M - $1BN in cash without a calendar full of meetings and you have the freedom to control your time.

    B: Have $800BN - $1TN in stock which you cannot sell and you have a calendar full of daily meetings, zero breaks, and you can’t retire or speak freely because you carry a lot of market risk to your shareholders?