Running Claude Code Offline on an M3 Pro with Qwen3.6(har-ki.github.io)
9 pointsby har-ki2 hours ago3 comments
  • tasuki2 hours ago
    I understand why local, I don't understand why Claude Code. Is it better than the other harnesses?

    I thought the main reason for using Claude Code was that it was the only harness one was allowed to use with the Claude subscription plan...

    • har-ki33 minutes ago
      Fair question. I haven’t benchmarked it against other harnesses, so I can’t say it’s better.

      My reason for using claude code is continuity - I use it for dev (it’s also the tool of choice for most people I work with), and it already has the context. And it supports both frontier and OSS models.

    • msradaman hour ago
      The inertia of switching. At least for me, being able to maintain the same UX and configuration for agentic coding is a benefit. I have access to internal models at work where I use a LiteLLM proxy with Claude Code, so no Anthropic models, but I can maintain the same .claude between personal and work machines. Though I'm definitely open to a non-Anthropic harness if it's a clear win.
      • har-ki31 minutes ago
        Yes!! And your LiteLLM-proxy-to-internal-models setup is a cleaner setup than mine.
  • corporealshiftan hour ago
    i don't understand why people would ever want to read this kind of article. The information is ok, but it's a regurgitation of many sources, some of it incorrect, covered in ai slop prose.

    Please share the cool thing you're doing in a blog post, but don't have AI write it for you; it's hard to read and doesn't respect the reader

  • har-ki2 hours ago
    [flagged]