10 pointsby russdill3 hours ago3 comments
  • mlhpdx3 hours ago
    I don’t understand what Flux hoped to gain in this situation. It seems counterproductive to building a platform for engineers while attacking folks respected by engineers.
    • throwaway81523an hour ago
      It sounds like the hands of what Ed Zitron calls business idiots are in play.
    • phoronixrly2 hours ago
      They wanted the make sure Adafruit stays silent about the number of active users, and Adafruit gave them some leverage by imo naively reporting a security vulnerability.
      • SwellJoe13 minutes ago
        What do you mean by "naively"? Reporting a security vulnerability to the vendor is the responsible and ethical thing to do. Suing someone who did you a favor is fucked up behavior and they should be shunned for it.
  • phoronixrly3 hours ago
    How many CFAA cases have to be filed in order for people to stop (gratuitously) reporting security vulnerabilities to corporations? Just stop, you don't owe them that, and it always comes off as an attempt at blackmail. If you care so much about their users, report to security authorities instead.
    • russdillan hour ago
      The "security authorities"? Who exactly is that? And what action are the expected to take?

      Responsible disclosure is not gratuitous, it's not blackmail. It is a standard industry practice. And the entity you notify is the vendor.

    • SwellJoe12 minutes ago
      Wtf are "the security authorities"?
  • dsl2 hours ago
    TLDR: Adafruit found out Flux was being dishonest about their user numbers. They also found and responsibly disclosed that they could get their Firebase keys by opening up Chrome's devtools.