160 pointsby inatreecrown28 hours ago18 comments
  • freetime26 hours ago
    This story has a strong "life sucks then you die" vibe going for it. And the afterlife also sucks apparently (although I don't personally believe in an afterlife).

    Hopelessness and injustice seem to be the current zeitgeist - at least for anyone who spends a lot of time online. And I get it, there's plenty to be unhappy about.

    But my counter-argument is that it's possible to do things in life that you're proud of. And find happiness in the simplest of places. And most people would do better to focus the majority of their attention on those things.

    This story says "do yourself a favour and forgive yourself for any failings on your part, you’re only human after all" - which I agree with. But I'd go one step further and add "celebrate your successes" and try to align your life in such a way that you can have successes worthy of celebrating.

    It makes me wonder: with everyone seemingly so unhappy, why aren't there more people pursuing alternative lifestyles? Similar to the 60s counterculture. You don't need the whole world to go along with you - just a handful (or less) of likeminded people. Or some people even manage to go it alone.

    It seems a lot of people (perhaps a vocal minority?) actually enjoy being upset. Or maybe everyone is going through ups and downs but we just tend to be more vocal when we're upset.

    • _factor3 hours ago
      It’s not the lifestyle that makes some people unhappy, it’s the knowledge that there is suffering around the world they can do near nothing to stop.

      Not everyone frames their happiness solely on conditions within their own sphere. Knowledge comes with responsibility.

      • freetime2a few seconds ago
        > God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.

        Sorry for the cliche quote, but I feel it's relevant.

      • xg1523 minutes ago
        Yeah, a bit of this. Speaking from Europe, there is the latent feeling of war, and the fear that an even larger one may come. It's also becoming increasingly clear what kind of visions the powerful people are trying to realize, and don't have much to do with the kind of optimistic visions for the future that I grew up with. Lastly there is a feeling of helplessness in the face of all this.

        There is still a lot of counterculture in spite of all this - and honestly, it even feels more enticing than it used to. But it also feels more hedonistic and escapist than like a genuine alternative way of living.

        Things feel less like the 1980s and more like the 1920s...

      • GlickWick2 hours ago
        I agree to the extent that you can impact things around you, but is the general chaos and suffering in the world outside of that sphere really a responsibility? At some point you have to accept you can really only impact the sphere unless you end up being a major historical figure.
        • vineyardmikean hour ago
          I think one of life's big questions is defining the size of your sphere of responsibility.

          Some people decide that sphere is really big, and they go on to be those historical figures. Others define it really big, and wallow in angst, aware and powerless to the suffering. Others still define it too small, and by the end of their life, find regret that they didn't try to help those within reach.

        • freetime2an hour ago
          > unless you end up being a major historical figure

          I would only God could end suffering in the world. And even they can't/won't do that.

    • jimmaswell5 hours ago
      > why aren't there more people pursuing alternative lifestyles? Similar to the 60s counterculture.

      I think the brony and furry community count for some examples. Brony community has been a major counter-culture since its inception and I truly believe it's had a measurable impact on gender norms and some other areas. Many of us see it as something of a lifestyle where it dominates the spaces we primarily engage in etc.

      Furry is even bigger and easier to argue as a popular counterculture lifestyle, and growing all the time (record convention attendance every year).

      They're also places where some other things like polyamory are more common, and much more LGBT/etc inclusive than average (which is less of a statement now, but they were both far ahead of the curve on that years ago), refreshingly sex-positive (at least the parts of the communities I identify with).

      Personally all of those things apply to me and I love being a part of those communities. Brony community has been a hugely important thing in my life since high school and working on game development there was a big jumpstart on experience working in a team/technical experience. Furry I only started exploring more a few years ago but I've made a lot of great friends and met my current partners there too.

      Brony's a consistent core of lifetime holdouts like me and a steady trickle of new people at this point, and furry's growing faster all the time - even the little bonfire meetup at a nature preserve I like to go to had a record smashing attendance on opening day this year.

      • freetime24 hours ago
        While brony and furry weren't exactly what I had in mind, I think you're 100% correct. And also a great example of finding happiness in simple places. Whatever gets your juices flowing (figuratively speaking).
      • kunai4 hours ago
        I thought bronyism sort of died out and that the furry community sort of subsumed it.

        I'd also add that I think the increased self-ID of young people in the LGBTQ community is in and of itself sort of a means to access a sort of alternative lifestyle. Many of these people live somewhat hedonistic, bohemian, artsy lifestyles that disregard traditional notions of success or traditional standards and mores in relationships and love.

    • 8note3 hours ago
      > why aren't there more people pursuing alternative lifestyles?

      generally land costs

    • smnplk5 hours ago
      > And the afterlife also sucks apparently (although I don't personally believe in an afterlife).

      Why don't you believe in the experience after dying ?

      • BLKNSLVR5 hours ago
        I'm going to say it will be similar to the experience prior to birth / conception, ie. we were nothing, and to nothing we shall return.

        It's a scary feeling if you can grasp it. Grasping non-existence from within existence is difficult, I've consciously tried to do it and succeeded a couple of times, but it's fleeting and both times it affected my breathing and heart rate in a similar way to fear or panic or pain.

        • smnplk43 minutes ago
          So you will experience something then, if you say that you experienced this nothingness before you were born :D ;)

          What I was aluding to is that people have profound consciouss experience when they are dying. Even clinicaly dead people with zero brain activity. But even if EEGs can't detect extremely low brain activity, it's still weird to have such rich experiences.

          I would have never found metaphysics in my life, if i didn't have a few unnatural experiences. I would not find the big explanatory gap between experience and matter, which is so obvious to me now. I would still be a materialist while not even knowing I was one, like many here in these comments.

          Before I was a materialist like you and I was not afraid of dying, because like you, I thought it's just lights out and I am no more, so I can not suffer. But now I am more afraid od death, because of the unknown that follows.

        • skissane39 minutes ago
          Do you know whether we live in a computer simulation?

          If we do, well it would seem trivially possible for our simulators to provide us with an afterlife if they wished–and we honestly could have no idea what they might wish.

          If you claim to know we don't live in a computer simulation, or that if we do, our simulators would be unlikely to grant us an afterlife–how do you know that?

          P(we live in a computer simulation) ~= 0.5

          P(there is an afterlife|we live in a computer simulation) ~= 0.5

          Therefore, P(there is an afterlife) >= 0.25 even if we assume P(there is an afterlife|we don't live in a computer simulation) = 0.0 (which is itself highly debatable)

        • whatshisface5 hours ago
          As someone who was born, I can attest that the experience of not being born consisted of billions of years passing by in an imperceptibly short instant, followed by being five.
        • canyp5 hours ago
          I go through that exercise of visualizing the void and it is fascinating and terrifying at the same time, especially if you do it before going to sleep.

          That being said, you can't just assume that existence is bounded by your living memories. You might as well have been everything instead of nothing prior to being spawned and you just don't remember it.

          • Hammershaftan hour ago
            If you're a materialist and you think there is no afterlife then I don't believe there would be a void. There's no mechanism for "you" to perceive a void or perceive time.

            Its the difference between:

            "I see nothing when I close my eyes" (actually you 'see' darkness over time)

            and...

            "I see nothing through my elbow" (You really don't see anything through your elbow because the capacity for it just doesn't exist.)

            Even our basic perception of time is mediated by the structure of our brains... and without that there's no difference between one second and a trillion^trillion years.

          • BLKNSLVR4 hours ago
            > you can't just assume that existence is bounded by your living memories

            I was going to raise that, but couldn't find a short enough way to describe it properly. Something like:

            Existence beyond what you can actually remember doesn't matter because it's outside any bounds of practical discussion; it should be excluded from consideration. The same way it's impossible to predict anything 'before the big bang' because we only have 'after the big bang' as useful evidence. There is no way to verify any continuity if you can't remember it or if there is no evidence of it. There's no guarantee you can even comprehend what it could be, 'you' as a concept may not even exist and it's unlikely to be relate-able to anything in this living world. Maybe you return to being 0.00001% of the collective consciousness of the universe, or any other crackpot thing anyone wants to suggest. Flying Spaghetti Monster.".

          • ed_mercer4 hours ago
            I've always wondered why doing it before sleep amplifies the anxiety
        • albatross794 hours ago
          It's very easy to grasp, do you remember what it was like before your first memory? No? That's what it's like.
          • BLKNSLVR4 hours ago
            Nope. That's a long way from grasping it. That's seeing it from a distance and understanding the general shape.

            I may just be defining 'grasp' differently to you though.

      • freetime25 hours ago
        I think that once the power supply to my brain shuts down, that's likely the end of my conscious experience.
      • queenkjuul2 hours ago
        Dead brains don't feel
  • hankbond6 hours ago
    I don't really get it, but still kind of liked it?

    I enjoyed the abstractness of the story and the disjointedness of the time aspects. I don't disagree with the salience of the point Death made but it kind of felt like an exposition dump in a movie.

    Not that I'm a good writer (or reader tbh) but I think focusing more on the first kind of writing and less on the second would have connected more with me.

    • aklemm4 hours ago
      It seems like a gem to me. For those who don’t “get it” just think about what it evokes and follow those thoughts. That’s all there is to it.
  • anon-39885 hours ago
    This style of writing feels like the Minecraft Parkour Civilization https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pFwQiwRbcg

    There's a perfect balance of absurdity and casualness that makes almost perfect sense that you can follow the show, and yet bizarre enough that you stick to know more.

    • mock-possuman hour ago
      Wow this is mindnumbing, it just keeps going and going and going.
  • ndhbxyd5 hours ago
    Most people/groups are taught How to survive.

    Many coast on just that knowledge and die without the WHY to survive question ever coming up.

    But if it does come up for you at some point in life, know that different philosophies have different answers. These days you can find summaries of all of them neatly complied like a restaurant menu thanks to LLMs.

    People are very diffefent so you find the philosophy that fits you. Also thanks to all those differences proving one is the best is a waste of time and energy. Different ones are useful for different situations.

    • matthewdgreen5 hours ago
      I had the experience recently of asking an LLM about the Buddhist view on reincarnation, and then hearing its views on what this means for its own existence. I'm not sure any of it left me feeling better about death, but it was a fascinating conversation.
      • ndhbxyd3 hours ago
        Its a beautiful thing to be able to have these chats. In the past you had to spend a lot of time and resources searching for the person not just with the knowledge but the patience, time and capacity to communicate it well. Open Yale courses has great free phil courses, and then chating about that content with an LLM adds a whole lot more to depth.
  • teekert36 minutes ago
    Gotta love those comments. Goes to show, you can be called out like that, and be on the HN front page at the same time. When you're young, you may not realize this. I never did when I judged my own stuff as (too) edgy.
  • jadar5 hours ago
    “Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.” - Ecclesiastes 12:13-14
    • Shellban4 hours ago
      Ecclesiastes is an interesting one. It goes chapter by chapter, trying to find meaning in life through process of elimination, trying education, hedonism, labor, and wealth. While some things (usually wisdom) bring about more joy in the interim, he declares that they all will lose their charm rather quickly. In the end, all joy from these will leave us before death. Solomon's last hope for fulfillment lies in the eternal and supernatural.
      • NBJack4 hours ago
        Solomon seems to give a glimpse into a life of "what happens if the only challenges you have are the ones you freely pick?" He had everything one could dream of and more, including an unprecedented era of peace.

        Yet he struggled to pass the time. Having the equivalent of billions of [insert favorite currency here], most folks fantasize about the ideal life. We often believe all of our immediate problems go away, free to do whatever we want. Yet, at least in Solomon's case, he seemed to become incredibly fed up with these grand projects and plans of his own devise.

        While I certainly wouldn't mind a fraction of that wealth myself, I do recall my college weekends. Free to spend time however I pleased, with my basic needs met and no homework looming, I spent hours playing my favorite video games. And yet, no matter how good they were, I remember how dull and boring they eventually became in only a few hours.

    • weregiraffe3 hours ago
      Which God? Yahweh, Jesus, Allah? Brahma, Amaterasu, Ahura Mazda?
      • TonyStr24 minutes ago
        The first three are the same, and the latter three are in no way related to the passage.
  • _doctor_love5 hours ago
    I appreciate the Australian salty outlook on life, feels very much present in this story.

    To my mind there is a Buddhist story hiding in here. The whole idea about an endless black void and that the protagonist considered sitting felt…allegorical? metaphorical?

    The end is what drove it home for me. People generally speaking would prefer not to do any internalizing about death whatsoever and will take an endless wandering over the hard work of being human.

  • avilay6 hours ago
    Can a kind soul write down their interpretation of the story? I didn't quite get it.

    [Edit]: Thanks for all the explanations!

    • freetime26 hours ago
      I'm not quite sure I got it either, but I guess this is probably the main gist:

      > by the time most people wind up here, they’ve got plenty of regrets. Nobody gets it all right. You’re born, and then you go through life making the choices that you think are the best given the information you have at the time, and you don’t always have all the information to make the right choices. Do yourself a favour and forgive yourself for any failings on your part, you’re only human after all

    • Waterluvian6 hours ago
      I’m going to annoy people who actually wield this language well. I feel like there’s less of a clear point and more of an aesthetic. Like not even metaphorical or allegorical. It’s just the overall feel of wandering and pointlessness that creates a sense of calm.
    • Yen5 hours ago
      I'm reminded of the lyrics from Pink Floyd's Time:

        "And then one day you find
        Ten years have got behind you
        no one told you when to run
        you missed the starting gun"
      
      The longer you live, the more tiny little mistakes you make. Things that at the time you could have done better, if you'd known, if you'd been a bit more careful. And these weigh on you, emotionally, pretty consistently.

      And while it's pretty absurd, in the story, such tiny mistakes having such outsized consequences, the story reminds us that such severe consequences are well within the realm of possibility. People do lose limbs off of little, careless mistakes. Doubly so with all the incredibly concentrated sources of energy we have in the modern world - power tools, automobiles, explosives.

      Would one really lose ten years trying to pick out a single Netflix show? No. But could one wake up one day and realize that they'd accomplished nothing of note for a decade, that all their free time was dumped into Netflix shows that weren't even that good?

      So, what do you do with all that? Memento Mori, I guess.

      • SoftTalker5 hours ago
        I've accomplished nothing of note ever. Most people don't. They just live their lives, trying to get by as best they can.
        • ricardobeat3 hours ago
          I don't know if that is true. For large swaths of the population, raising a child is their biggest accomplishment. Justifiably so.

          Other accomplishments of note might be: a single conversation that helped someone change. Little acts that made the world a tiny bit better. Having brought happiness to other people. I like to think that is the meaning of not wasting your time – not just measuring your life's worth with a science/capitalism lens.

    • ok_dad6 hours ago
      Don’t sweat the small stuff
      • senectus16 hours ago
        understated throwaway line. its often the small stuff that we gnaw on for too long.
    • 6 hours ago
      undefined
    • jckahn6 hours ago
      YOLO
      • gerdesj6 hours ago
        Beautifully put, in four letters.
    • sublinear6 hours ago
      It's an allegory for AI hysteria and WFH depression. Generally, anything to put a wet blanket on the nice things that have happened to tech workers in the past few years. To put salt in the wound, it's done in a style that used to delight HN.

      It reminded me of those cringe videos CGPGrey put out for COVID.

  • chopete34 hours ago
    These kind of write-ups always try to bring one into their real world senses.

    Few interesting observations

    >> Ten years gone for the sake of picking a Netflix show Thats just Netflix. With kids 18 years go by just like that.

    >> Nobody gets it all right. You’re born, and then you go through life making the choices that you think are the best given the information

    This is said numerous times but can give wrong interpretation. Choices are what make the life. Life and choices are not parallel tracks.

  • rdtsc6 hours ago
    For some reason I imagined death from The Seventh Seal by Bergman here. Very calm and matter for fact kind of a character. Maybe once in a while he may decide to visit for a game of chess...
  • _gmax06 hours ago
    Winston Churchill once laid bricks as a means to outrun the black dog.
  • fractalf7 hours ago
    Fantastic, thanks for that!
  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • tclover4 hours ago
    It's a funny story if you look at the end of life from a materialistic viewpoint on the origin of consciousness, but that’s not the only perspective.
  • crooked-v6 hours ago
    Reminds me of the cut number "The Hole" from the Beetlejuice stage musical: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYa31LqxKc8
  • npl6 hours ago
    Great
  • root_axis3 hours ago
    Kafka pastiche.
  • morpheos1375 hours ago
    if life didn't suck and there were not the time out of death there would be no drive to optimize the time we have.