Little did you know, LC-style question is never about grinding LC. Algorithmic puzzles are one of the few legal ways of measuring candidate's IQ without directly asking. Companies are looking for a way to hire smart people, so they rely on LC as a signal. It can be replaced with any similar signal as well (ranging from how many cats can you ship to ISS to solve blackhole physics.)

perhaps for companies that are low balling compensation will not budge on leetcode and only those that see real uplifts from AI use will move away from it, testing more for holistic and experience based tests.

i could be misreading it

I'm sure there's a set of problems that LLMs solve in a non-optimal way unless prompted with the specific solution.

> There is a notion floating around that DSA interview questions are quickly becoming obsolete, since you can just ask an LLM for an optimal solution now.

They are obsolete for remote jobs which if the interview is done fully remotely, it can then be gamed/cheated easily.

There will still be Leetcode interviews. But this time, they are in-person and on site. So:

> do you think leetcode style interviews are going the way of the dinosaur, or will they stay or even have a resurgence?

They will stay and be even more important. Companies still ask them but in person.

Companies like Anthropic do not allow you to use LLMs in their interviews. Expect many companies to do the same.