Rossman sometimes makes good points, but he's also very prone to generating controversial content (intentionally), so as always, practice some level of skepticism.
Rossman is only controversial if you don't think people are entitled to privacy and consumers aren't entitled to the entirety of the products they purchase.
His talks seem pretty clear cut to me. Can you list some examples?
"Flock is bad" is not a controversial statement. "Mandatory age verification tech lobbied for by Meta is bad" is not a controversial statement. "Open source 3D printing should be defended from billionaires" is not a controversial statement.