165 pointsby speckx5 hours ago30 comments
  • caseysoftware2 hours ago
    I have the 2017 edition of the Lego Millenium Falcon and ~7500 pieces took about 30 hours without being super organized or focused. At that rate, this is almost 50 hours of assembly but I'd wager there's a ton of duplication in this one, likely speeding things up.

    And yes, for these sorts of sets, you put them on display. I added LEDs to mine:

    https://x.com/CaseySoftware/status/1766667069003645362

    • staplung36 minutes ago
      Ha! This set it designed to take 114 years to construct and for maximum verisimilitude, Lego will run over your foot with a Lego tram after only a few decades of trying to build it.
    • genocidicbunnyan hour ago
      I'd love to see the back of that if you actually integrated the LEDs into the main engine (and I apologize if you did post other photos, I have X mostly blocked so I can only see the directly linked post.) I've been hacking at adding some lights to a few sets that I thought would look great with actual lighting on them, and my biggest challenge has been the routing of all the wires in a way where the lights actually look like they're integrated into the set and not just randomly sticking out of places.
      • caseysoftwarean hour ago
        I don't think I have pictures of the back specifically but the route was:

        Started on one side of the engine framing, all the way across, inside through the body then around the round section holding the bottom gun turret, then along the front bottom edge, back into the body and around the top round section of the gun turret, back into the body into the bridge and across the ceiling ending there.

        The LED string itself had adhesive backing, so I'd put it in place, remove a section of the adhesive cover, attach it, then do another section. It was probably 3-6" at a time, so not fast or easy. I had to take off a bunch of the ship panels - super easy - to get at some of the portions. My goal was that you couldn't see the LEDs directly from most viewing angles and was mostly successful

        The LED string was ~$60 and it was a silly amount of work but I have it sitting over my left shoulder during conference calls and people ask about it constantly so it was fun.

        Other pics: https://x.com/CaseySoftware/status/1757069749501018411

        Edit: Just realized you can see the string here: https://x.com/CaseySoftware/status/1980269018511794422

    • FireBeyond36 minutes ago
      That adds up. I have the Tower Bridge, Grand Piano, and Lighthouse that were similar. Tower Bridge was 4200 and 20 hours, Grand Piano, 3600 and 15, Lighthouse about 3000 and 12.

      I pre-ordered this, though!

  • sizzzzlerz3 hours ago
    Once built, what does one do with this? Generally, these are fragile in the sense that moving them can cause parts of it to become disconnected or fall apart so you don't want to be moving it around to much. It's going to take up a whole lot of space. Your kids can't actually play with it. And if you intend to show it off, you aren't really showing any real skills except for the ability to follow pages and pages of instructions. I don't even want to think about what would be involved in disassembling it such that it could be rebuilt per the instructions.
    • leipert3 hours ago
      In Germany there is a Lego subscription service.

      Put sets on a wishlist, they send you one of them. You build it, unbuild it and send it back. One set a month.

      • b473a3 hours ago
        I feel like if I were just a little deeper on the Autism Spectrum I would really like Germany.
      • progforlyfe3 hours ago
        that sounds awesome. sad that something like that probably would not work well in USA. don't have the culture for it. too many pieces would get lost.
        • furyofantares35 minutes ago
          > that sounds awesome. sad that something like that probably would not work well in USA. don't have the culture for it. too many pieces would get lost.

          I think the idea of "Netflix for LEGOs" started where one might expect X but for Y services to start - California.

          We used one of these services in the USA somewhere nearing 10 years ago. Looks like they're still around at https://netbricks.biz/ - but I also see https://brick-library.com/ and https://brickdrop.co and wouldn't be surprised if there's more. It worked great. I detected zero incompatibility with my being from the USA. I didn't eat or carelessly throw away a single brick.

          From a search it look like Pleygo was the first such startup from 2012 and based in San Jose / Santa Clara, but is no longer around.

        • fluoridationan hour ago
          I would assume it'd be pretty easy to have a system to count pieces and replenish lost ones. Actually, I'd be surprised if the German scheme doesn't already work like that. I don't see why it couldn't work.
      • frakkingcylons2 hours ago
        Sounds amazing. I build and unbuild but then just put the box back in storage (my closet).
    • ragebol3 hours ago
      Why do people put up flowers? No skill (I think...?) involved in getting a bouquet and putting it a vase on a table. Or buying (not creating) art. Some people just like the look and it;'s hard to argue about taste.

      If people have a Lego set on display, that is surely a conversation starter for me. Especially if it's a ginormous Minas Tirith or Sagrada Familia set, or an old Technic set.

      Not for everyone I suppose.

      • FireBeyond32 minutes ago
        I have shelving behind me that gets a lot of conversations between the Lego Architecture and bonsai and botanicals.

        My partner likes a lot of the botanicals in our living room, on top of speakers, etc. The table has a vase with bouquet. That's our agreement, architecture and other things (Lighthouse, Jazz Quartet, Ship in a Bottle, Grand Piano are my favorite) in my office, botanicals in the living room.

    • nly3 hours ago
      It's not about the result. Most people who build these sets get satisfaction from the build process itself. It's a form of therapy.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IKEA_effect

      • genocidicbunny3 hours ago
        With that said, as someone who put together the Big Ben set back in the day and had raw fingers for a week after, I have a somewhat PTSD-like reaction to this set. It looks like there are going to be a lot of steps dealing with making many of a subassembly that is itself made out of a bunch of tiny pieces that you need to make sure line up well.

        These days I much prefer the large Technic theme sets because they are not so repetitive and require a deeper immersion to actually complete; harder to just space out while building the set. Certainly more meditative for me.

        All that is to say that if you're going to consider this set, be aware that the build experience might not be the level of fun that the part count seems to indicate.

    • olyjohnan hour ago
      Sometimes the build is the fun part. Haven't you ever put together a puzzle?
    • pickleglitch3 hours ago
      For me, when I was into legos, the answer would be: take it apart and add the pieces to my larger collection, from which I can build whatever I want.
      • f4c39012an hour ago
        It's an impressive model and I'd like to see it in the Lego shop - but I wouldn't like to own it. When it comes time to use the pieces for something else, that's ten thousand beige blocks. Its like some of the Star Wars Lego, for instance the AT-AT is a fantastic creation but its just all the same colour, and to me isn't interesting for more than a few minutes. I like the larger builds that are minifigure-scaled e.g. the bookshop or Hogsmeade or Ninjago city gardens, there's much more detail and variation and fun
      • seanhunter2 hours ago
        Me too. Reminds me of the Milton Jones joke:

        When I was younger, I used to own a zoo, and a pirate ship....

        Though not at the same time. We couldn't afford that much lego.

      • raffael_de2 hours ago
        when you were into Legos, the bricks used were of universal shape. modern sets like this are mostly of a shape that is highly specific to the intended outcome. which is basically orthogonal to the original appeal of playing with Lego. I'm saying that as someone who grew up with two large boxes full of Lego bricks and pieces.
        • genocidicbunny2 hours ago
          This is actually not particularly true. In fact, the problem of unique pieces almost ended up sinking Lego because they were spending so much on molds and manufacturing of a single piece that was only used in one set. If the set didn't sell well, Lego could potentially lose money on the set overall because of all the tooling costs.

          Back in the aughts, they redid their philosophy of having large single-purpose pieces and went to having those large pieces be replaced by subassemblies of much smaller pieces that were much more general purpose. That's when SNOT became huge in Lego's official sets.

          As someone with multiple decades of experience with Lego, things now are much much better than they were back in the 90's and early aughts specifically because of this pivot that Lego did. There is something to be said about part count inflation, and how many of the parts nowadays are tiny little pieces rather than the big 2x2 or 2x4 bricks. And also, some sets and some themes do require their unique pieces. Friends has their little minifigures that are different from the standard minifigs. The Mario sets might need to have some specific pieces -- there's no standard 'mario mustache' tile. But overall, Lego has done a pretty incredible job of increasing the utility and decreasing the single-use aspect of many pieces.

          • claytonjy2 hours ago
            With a lot of the adult-oriented sets (ICONS and others), especially anything plant-based, they go out of their way to point out how they're using existing pieces in an unusual way. One example is the cherry blossoms on the bonsai tree are actually frogs, but cast in a pink color for the first time, called out in the instruction manual as you're building it.

            I love it, knowing about these little details. Also fun to share with friends that inquire about the various LEGO on display in the house. This, and all the fancy mechanics (e.g. typewriter, nintendo), engender a ton of respect and awe for the designers.

            • genocidicbunny2 hours ago
              I've talked with a Lego designer before, and for some themes they're not allowed to even request new molds. Even new colors of existing pieces can be contentious. My own head canon about the bonsai set is that the reason they made such a big fuss about having the recolored frogs is because it probably was a big fuss internally too. "Who'd ever need pink frogs?" sort of thing.
      • zem30 minutes ago
        when I was into legos (as a kid; I've sadly had too many hobbies and not enough time as an adult) I would jump directly to step 2. I only bought (asked my parents for :)) specific models if they had a lot of interesting new piece types.
      • card_zeroan hour ago
        This cathedral would make a very fine intergalactic battlecruiser.
        • electrospherean hour ago
          You could probably make Rocky's ship from Project Hail Mary with this cathedral model.
    • nkrisc3 hours ago
      Enjoy its presence. If that doesn’t sound like something you’d enjoy, then it’s not the right set for you. Not something I’d ever buy, but I’m sure many will.
    • varun_ch3 hours ago
      > Once built

      If the LEGO are truly accurate to the real thing, that might take a while!

      • vaylianan hour ago
        Over a century, as a matter of fact.
    • xtracto3 hours ago
      My wife took on building the plant inspired lego sets several months ago. They are OK in that they don't look that ugly scattered around the house. I like it because it is a hobby she enjoys a lot and it makes it easier for me to buy "the right" gifts haha.

      I've never had the patience to build those. I think I have PTSD from my childhood, when my dat bought us a "cheap" brand of lego-like toys (called TENTE I think) for which the bottom pieces fell as you plugged the top pieces.

    • stronglikedan2 hours ago
      you don't build with legos expecting it to not fall apart. it's kind of the whole point, really...

      why do Buddhists make intricate sand sculptures only to rake them over when they're done?

    • scrollaway3 hours ago
      > Once built, what does one do with this?

      Are you asking about the church or the lego set?

    • Aurornis3 hours ago
      > Your kids can't actually play with it.

      Good luck to anyone who builds a lego set and then tries to tell my kids we can't play with it or steal parts from it for another build.

      LEGO has a wide audience. Some of these go to adults who build them and put them on display. Others will go to kids who build them and then take them apart to build the next thing.

      I wouldn't buy this huge set for my kids because that price tag is crazy, but I like buying some of the mid-size sets for them because it's a nice injection of specialty pieces that they like to incorporate into other builds.

      • Rebuff50072 hours ago
        > I wouldn't buy this huge set for my kids because that price tag is crazy, but I like buying some of the mid-size sets for them because it's a nice injection of specialty pieces that they like to incorporate into other builds.

        Very well said, and this was exactly my experience (as a child).

      • binary1323 hours ago
        $800 Lego sets with 12,000 pieces are for adults, mostly.
    • exssss17 minutes ago
      You must be fun at parties.
    • lovichan hour ago
      Just put it up for display. Me and my wife built several sets just to have an activity to do together, and then the resulting displays are memories of those fun times.
    • lowbloodsugar3 hours ago
      kragle!
    • binary1323 hours ago
      People treat giant lego sets the same way they treat other complex model sets, it’s not really for disassembling as much as it is for the fun of building and then having / being proud of, I guess, mostly. I mean you can never really speak for everyone but generally speaking.
    • rjh292 hours ago
      What's the point of a colouring book? Once you've coloured your drawing you can't do anything with it. You can display it but you're not showing any real skill.

      ^ bizarre thought process tbh. Both building it and displaying it is fun. That's all.

      • bartread2 hours ago
        I genuinely think there are people who don’t “get” hobbies or, if they do, don’t get that other people might like hobbies other than the ones they like. As you say, the point is to enjoy it and that’s all.
      • esafak2 hours ago
        Coloring books give you some freedom; to pick your own colors and texture. If we were to draw an analogy, it would be using the LEGO pieces in this kit to build something else. But nobody is going to do that, so it is like a color-by-numbers book, which exercises little creativity. It's a mindless activity to pass the time.
        • rjh2928 minutes ago
          Yeah, what's wrong with that exactly?
  • slg3 hours ago
    If we scale it by height, a historically accurate building of this set should take you approximately 200 days.
    • ragebol3 hours ago
      12000 pieces over 200 days, means about 60 pieces per day. I'd say that is a reasonable about actually.
      • genocidicbunny2 hours ago
        So the set supposedly is going to be built with the same progression as the real thing -- the parts of the basilica that were built first in real life are also the first parts of building the Lego set.

        So I kinda wonder, what is the scaling like if you account for the actual build phases. How many pieces would you have to do on each of those 200 days to match the real-life progress of the basilica.

    • Georgelemental3 hours ago
      Why would you scale by height and not volume?
      • slg3 hours ago
        Because it doesn't appear to either be designed at a consistent scale or be a solid rectangular cuboid making volume feel like an even less accurate basis for my silly joke.
        • echoangle2 hours ago
          The shape doesn't matter for the scaling as long as it is a 3-dimensional object that is scaled in all directions.

          And I think for the actual value you get, scaling by volume would actually be more accurate.

          • nikhilisvalidan hour ago
            The original took 144 years to build, and this model is anywhere between 153 to 278 times smaller. If one were to scale by volume, the build time would take at most 22 minutes, and at least 3.

            I think scaling linearly works better here

    • readams2 hours ago
      Don't forget to include time to handle lawsuits and funding delays! Also, someone may break into your house and rip up the instruction book.
    • jknoepfler2 hours ago
      Well now I'm disappointed that it doesn't come with scaffolding.
    • binary1323 hours ago
      I’m a little disappointed that someone beat me to this.
  • jerhewet22 minutes ago
    Wow. Possibly the worst dickover[1] I've ever encountered.

    [1] https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/what_is_a_dickover

  • liendolucas3 hours ago
    When I was a kid I used to spend entire days building and creating new stuff once I built the designs from the booklets.

    Today when I see a Lego kit is kind of another toy: is designed to build one and only one design, compared to the generic kits that were sold and also popular many years ago.

    All these new kits pieces are just to accomplish one build. The Lego spirit of ever combining and creating with same pieces over and over again is gone.

    • epistasis3 hours ago
      My kids have a ton of legos, it's their favorite thing. However, and this is the important part: you have to let go of the concept of a set.

      Keep new assembled kits out, let them play with it as built from the instructions. But then as it falls apart with play, and the kids don't fix it the same way it was originally built, it eventually goes into a big box of former kits that are all jumbled together.

      We did this, and without prompting to do so, the kids started building their own things out of the box, exactly as you did with your kits.

      You just have to learn to let go of the set, and it becomes exactly what you want.

      Edit: I'm not sure if a $800 set has that same property, but for the everyday $5-$40 sets, absolutely treat them as temporary collections, and life is great.

      • genocidicbunny2 hours ago
        I have an anecdote about doing exactly that. Always was a LEGO kid (first set I got was bought 3 months before I was born) and slowly over time collected a giant bin of pieces from all the various sets. Now as a much older adult, I actually find myself going back to that bin on occasion to sort out the parts and try to rebuild the sets. Much like how that big bin of parts let me build stuff from my imagination when I was younger, as a form of therapy, now resorting those pieces and reorganizing them is a new form of therapy for myself, and it all comes from the same toy.

        I find it particularly endearing how a single system of toys can provide decades of experiences to a single human. I don't think I've ever encountered another toy that is like that on such a massive scale. Yes there's other construction toys out there that strive to do the same, Knex was another one that I was into for a while, but there's nothing that quite scratches that same itch that Lego does.

      • rpowers3 hours ago
        This is exactly how it happens at my house. I purposely stick to to the $20-$40 boxes for this reason. Over $100, that's not a toy anymore for me. That price range becomes a collectors figurine.
      • psadauskasan hour ago
        I have almost all of the $400+ star wars sets (and lotr, and star trek, ...), but relatively limited shelf space.

        They only stay on the shelf for a couple years before I take it apart, rinse the dust off, sort it into ziplock bags, and add it to a box in the closet. Then I pick an old one I disassembled before, but hasn't been seen in awhile, or remember having fun building it, and spend a weekend or week building it again.

        My favorite part is building them, so I get to enjoy doing that several times per set, often while having the corresponding movie on in the background.

      • bredren2 hours ago
        Yes. I got somewhat stuck on the idea of the sets being kept together, partly because I thought it would be good to pass on used ones with the manuals.

        But I found that if the builds are out they will be played with and fall apart and eventually become loose legos and that’s all fine and good.

        Loose Legos on the floor making random things is fun. But building with sets and instructions is a different skill set and is entertaining in its own right.

        The newer Friends series has a short reward video at the end of some builds which sort of puts the cherry on top of the set builds.

      • cowlby2 hours ago
        Yes this, I bought sets like the Arctic Ship and police bases thinking they'd be like dioramas. They quickly became components that they build other things on top of. It took some time to mentally un-anchor from the $500 spent on the sets lol.
    • Aurornis3 hours ago
      > When I was a kid I used to spend entire days building and creating new stuff once I built the designs from the booklets.

      Kids still do this.

      I don't know why this idea persists. There have always been sets with custom pieces. My kids go crazy over the custom pieces because it sparks new ideas for their other builds. My kids know every custom piece from every set they've ever built and will describe them in great detail so we can search through the bin until we find it.

      > The Lego spirit of ever combining and creating with same pieces over and over again is gone

      For you, maybe. The kids are still doing this and having a great time.

      • vidarh3 hours ago
        A lot of the Lego builds we did when my son was little was exactly this: A set would spark an idea and there'd be endless castles that started with piece of a castle set but went in totally different directions and incorporated all kinds of other stuff, for example.

        I can't but help think that people who assume that the big sets take away that haven't touched Lego in decades.

        My sons sets got built "to spec" once, got played with like that for a few hours, and then never looked the same again ever, even though we still have the manuals in a box somewhere.

        • bluedino3 hours ago
          I find most of my kids friends don't mix sets, each set stays in its own box/bag
          • embedding-shape2 hours ago
            That's borderline crazy, lego is meant to go into a big box/bag/container and be mixed so you use your own imagination to create your own stuff, like the lego gods intended. Ideally also passed down generations/between relatives, so you can visit your nieces and nephews in the future and recognize pieces you once received from some cousin or something.
          • AlanYx2 hours ago
            Did the parents grow up with Lego? The "each set stays in its own bag" thing was what my wife wanted to do for the longest time, not having grown up with the beautiful chaos of a giant tub of pieces, and the oddly reassuring sound of swishing your hand through all of it.
          • vidarh3 hours ago
            That sounds really sad, and not Lego's fault...
    • hgoel3 hours ago
      That seems to be somewhat of an exaggeration. These $800 models are obviously not for kids. The creativity is still alive in the price brackets that aren't targeting collectors. Custom builds that involve scavenging other kits for pieces still go viral pretty often.

      I'm not very tapped into it, but last month I saw a DIY Lego Rocky from Project Hail Mary going viral. I think this week I saw a very detailed jellyfish model doing the rounds.

    • ribosometronome3 hours ago
      All new kits? Gone? I'm not so sure about that. I don't think the target audience of an $800 kit is a 10 year old, sure. There are still plenty of kits at the $100ish and below price range that are targeted for that sort of play.
    • WheatMillingtonan hour ago
      Weird perspective. When I was a kid (I'm 41) we were given sets - pirate ship, submarine, police sets. They were designed as a kit... and once we built the kid we'd pull it apart and use the parts for all sorts of things. Now my kids do they very same thing with modern kits. I'm not sure why you think today's lego is different?
    • butlike3 hours ago
      There's a recurring theme on the Lego subreddit where people build the millennium falcon out of any arbitrary lego set, so the spirit is not COMPLETELY dead, fwiw
    • a34729t3 hours ago
      These are toys for adults, to be put on the bookshelf once complete.
    • mmusc3 hours ago
      There was a period that was very true when Ninjago were a thing. But in the last decade while they sometimes still come out with new pieces there is still a tonne of reusability and creativity in Lego pieces.
    • alephnerd3 hours ago
      You can still buy bulk Legos to mix and match from Lego. And similarly pricey and collector oriented Lego sets existed 20 and 30 years ago as well.

      Legos releasing single build sets that are clearly targeted for adults (look at the 18+ age statement) does nothing to harm you - it's targeted a different consumer demographic.

      It's like Taco Bells now serving alcohol or Costcos now selling Asian groceries. Companies will not stay stagnant and will look at additional opportunities to expand to new buyer demographics.

      • pyreko3 hours ago
        Exactly, and like, if one literally looks up "Lego catalogue" and actually read it you'll get a bunch of sets - even the brand tie-ins, which aren't new at all - and these are basically the same types of sets I grew up with and would happily build and then take apart as a kid to do other stuff with...
        • cryzinger3 hours ago
          Lego also has "3-in-1" sets that come with dedicated instructions to build different possible configurations out of the exact same pieces, which seem like a cool way to encourage kids (or anyone :P) to then veer off into their own building experiments.
          • AlanYx3 hours ago
            There were also two 20-in-1 sets recently, both very reasonably priced. Those were huge hits in my house.
        • alephnerd3 hours ago
          Same here much to my parents chagrin - they thought buying me Lego sets would teach me to follow written instructions but joke's on them.
    • pyreko3 hours ago
      I mean yes, there are kits like this that are clearly meant for one kind of build, but nothing stops someone from just getting bulk kits or taking apart other sets? There's lots of other stuff on their catalogue which look just like the stuff I grew up with.

      I swear every lego-related post you see people dooming about this when all they look at are the giant sets clearly targeted towards adults that _want_ this sort of thing and not the plethora of other stuff.

    • raffael_de2 hours ago
      yes, this, thank you. just wrote a comment lamenting about this specifically.
    • Markoff3 hours ago
      you could not be more wrong

      https://rebrickable.com/sets/alternates/

      you just enter the number to find alternate builds, some sets can be built into dozens various creations

  • hohithere25 minutes ago
    At that price, better to go visit the real one.
  • latexsalesman23 hours ago
    Wonder if it will take as long to complete the Lego version as it took to complete the real thing.
  • alentredan hour ago
    Oh boy, I hope they didn't miss the opportunity here: this set must be missing the last pieces, complementary kits should be issued in the coming decades.
  • qrush3 hours ago
    It seems like this Lego set should also take 150+ years to build
  • Towaway694 hours ago
    What's the smallest 360deg camera? Would it be possible to create a virtual tour of the inside of this model with such a camera?

    Would interesting to use a quest and take a tour of the insides.

  • storusan hour ago
    With those prices LEGO is leaving a massive opening for their Chinese competitors.
    • yomismoaquian hour ago
      Question is, are Lego fans going to buy a similar-quality chinese product or do they only buy Lego?
      • Markoff6 minutes ago
        why not if it's the same thing for 1/3rd to 1/10th of the price? I mean you can buy some of them for one tenth, at that price is no brainer, I wonder why nobody imports them to Europe, it's same fun, no matter the brand

        we bought for son among others some motorbike model for like 10€ in China, same thing grim Lego would cost here in Europe like 50-80€

    • Markoff9 minutes ago
      it's already a thing in China, you can buy Lego clones for 1/10th - 1/3rd of the original one

      it's crazy how much ask Lego for few order of plastic, I couldn't believe how cheap rest clones are in China, it's shame they are not that cheap on AliExpress

      lego doesn't have patent on brick, so they can be exactly same and compatible, from my experiences only difference is in manual

  • spuz2 hours ago
    I normally love Lego's interpretation of various real architectural works but I don't believe there is enough detail here to really capture the unique style of Gaudi's design.
    • genocidicbunnyan hour ago
      They're doing the best they can given the budget and size constraints. The set has to simultaneously be interesting and not tedious to build, cost a somewhat reasonable amount, not be too huge that no one can display or even reasonably build it at home, and able to closely enough replicate what they're trying to model.

      Could they make a bigger version of this set that is more closely resembling the real thing? More than likely, yeah they can; look at the displays they have at Legoland. But would that more detailed version be accessible for even the well off AFOL? Most likely not. It'd be too big, too expensive, and too unwieldy, and will probably still fail to capture some of the details of the real thing.

    • pvillano2 hours ago
      12,060 pieces
  • jll292 hours ago
    People are apparently willing to pay a premium for older Lego sets, provided the original packaging is still intact.

    Older sets are offered and sold on eBay for substantially more oney that they cost when originally sold.

    • httpzan hour ago
      Only the collectible ones. It's do different with shoes, cars, Pokemon cards, etc
  • V__3 hours ago
    This looks very repetitive and not-fun to build.
    • butlike3 hours ago
      Yeah I agree. 12k pieces except you're building 100 pillars and 100 spires, all the same.
      • a_e_k2 hours ago
        On the other hand, crafts like knitting and other fiber arts can be very repetitive and people still enjoy them.

        (Personally, I've also enjoyed unit origami, which involves folding the same module many times over and assembling them.)

  • binaryturtle3 hours ago
    For the price tag I would have expected something bigger and more imposing (at least twice the size.)
  • pdw3 hours ago
    I'm sad that the building instructions link doesn't work. I'd love to see them.
  • ajaimk2 hours ago
    Would be funny if every box was missing a few pieces so you can not finish it :-)
    • wizardforhire2 hours ago
      And/Or halfway through have to change the design
  • analogpixel3 hours ago
    I like the idea of doing lego models, until I'm about 1/2 way through, then I think, "never again"
  • 3 hours ago
    undefined
  • ajaimk2 hours ago
    We're not supposed to finish this right?
  • outside12343 hours ago
    What they really should have done is sell the kit in 7 stages, each for $99 each, such that you can slowly build it as you can budget money for the construction. :)

    (This is how the Sagrada Família was built in case folks don't know its history)

    • pimlottc3 hours ago
      That would actually be really cool if each stage of the build reflected the actual construction history
  • zuzululu2 hours ago
    somebody outta make a cheaper affordable lego alternative

    its a god damn crime what lego is getting away with

    • margalabargala2 hours ago
      Adjusted for inflation, lego set prices have been consistent over the years:

      > https://bricknerd.com/home/greed-or-inflation-an-economic-an...

      Inflation-adjusted price per piece has actually been declining over the years, dropping from ~$0.25 to a current $0.10 on average. This set is $0.06 per piece, so even less expensive than a median set by that metric.

      • zuzululu2 hours ago
        but the people buying has not had their purchasing power keep up, demographic have shifted entirely over the years
    • Markoffa minute ago
      there are tons of them in China, you can buy them on AliExpress, though that are expensive there for 1/2-1/3rd of Lego

      but you wouldn't believe if I told you how much it cost in China, you can buy sets with hundreds of pieces for like 3-4 euros, I couldn't believe it when I saw the prices, Lego prices are highway robbery for piece of plastic

      and don't tell me about paying for their creativity, there are alternate builds made by fans for free which are better than the original sets

    • AlotOfReading2 hours ago
      Pantasy, Cobi, Funwhole, megabloks, etc. There's tons of alt bricks at nearly any reasonable price point. But you're still not going to find these sorts of multi-thousand piece sets for <$100 because it takes at least a few cents to produce a dimensionally accurate, quality controlled bit of plastic.
      • zuzululu2 hours ago
        But thats because they limit production to control prices, producing mass volume accurate plastic was never the bottleneck.
        • AlotOfReading2 hours ago
          These are remarkably close to the raw cost of materials and tooling. The Sagrada Familia model is a 12k piece set for $800, ~$0.07/piece. Phantasy has an unlicensed Opera set (85019) [0] with 3.5k pieces for $190, $0.05/piece. That's straight up cheap. They're not limiting production to control prices. High quality injection molding (in multiple colors no less!) is hard. 2 cents over 12k pieces does add up to a nice bit of change for Lego though.

          [0] https://pantasy.com/products/pantasy-the-opera-85019

    • httpzan hour ago
      If you can't afford to buy the lego, you definitely can't afford to have the space to display it.
    • gniv2 hours ago
      I just looked and of course there are: https://fr.aliexpress.com/item/1005010679835500.html
    • hazelnut2 hours ago
      BlueBrixx is becoming fairly popular in Germany right now. The sets look competitive to me:

      https://www.bluebrixx.com/en/bestsellers/

      • zuzululu2 hours ago
        still look insanely overpriced
    • eigenspace2 hours ago
      There are cheaper alternatives. People still generally prefer Lego.

      Also, is this one even that expensive? It's only 6 cents per piece.

  • ggm3 hours ago
    To all North Americans. The singular of Lego is Lego. The plural of Lego is .. Lego.

    It's like sheep. Legos is a mis--spelled City in Nigeria.

    • crims0n3 hours ago
      Not to all, plenty of us call them Legos.
    • rconti3 hours ago
      That's a strange way to spell Portugal
    • Hamukoan hour ago
      If we're drinking the Danish Kool-Aid, you're supposed to write it "LEGO".
  • namuol3 hours ago
    Looking forward to the expansion pack(s) for when they finish building the real cathedral
    • fauria3 hours ago
      It is not a cathedral, is a basilica: https://sagradafamilia.org/en/history-of-the-temple that will be finished next June 10th, coinciding with the 100th anniversary of Gaudi's death and the visit of pope Leo XIV to Madrid.
      • Hamukoan hour ago
        It will be "finished". Expect to see construction workers in the basilica deep into the 2030s.
      • rbonvall2 hours ago
        (It's Barcelona)
    • sizzzzlerz3 hours ago
      I wonder when they'll release the Spanish Inquisition set. Nobody will expect that.
  • dyauspitr2 hours ago
    I’ll never get Lego. Assembling a plastic premade model, with full instructions to get a blocky pixelated representation of the final thing. It just feels so tacky, it has no gravitas.

    That being said, I love Lego as a company and wish them all the success.

  • croes2 hours ago
    And how many of these 12,060 pieces are tiny pieces?

    Maybe it’s time to add the weight and the stud count

  • krembo2 hours ago
    If at all, then the white bricks of LEGO Architecture Studio are on my wishlist just because i dont like following instructions https://a.co/d/0iJANnKK
    • genocidicbunny2 hours ago
      So, fun trick with sets like these, that are in the more 'professional' space of Lego is that most of the time, these sets are very open ended because they only provide you a bunch of common pieces. Which you can buy yourself.

      Bricklink has a wonderful feature that you can take a set and then part it out into a wanted list, and then search seller inventory to find those parts. That's how I built that giant Imperial Star Destroyer set from the aughts for a little over $200 instead of the like $1000 that used copies of the set were going for at that time (it's probably even more now.)

      Just for funsies, I looked it up, and you can get the whole 21050 set for about $150 now on bricklink, which is a pretty good $/psc price. Considering what the set is, and the lack of stickers, means it should be easy to wash a used set to get all the pieces nice and clean; a laundry bra bag with a fine mesh works great for this.

  • khazhoux39 minutes ago
    “Build time: 144 years.”
  • stefantalpalaru42 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • coloncasserole3 hours ago
    [flagged]