2 pointsby amichail2 hours ago2 comments

Npovview2 hours ago
Another point is AI should be so advanced that only one shotting the solution is truly considered as AI.
90% of everything is crap. Sturgeon's Law. We produce crap all the time and yet expect AI to be perfect the first time. Have they ever seen the first draft of any book?
bigyabai2 hours ago
Because LLMs are expert liars?
- amichail2 hours ago
  I mean if they don't think AI is particularly creative, why attribute novel ideas that you had but wrote with the help of AI to the AI?
  - bigyabai2 hours ago
    Why does it matter what people think? The attribution ultimately doesn't matter, a truly novel idea is self-evident and speaks for itself.
    amichail2 hours ago
    The problem is that most people on social media don't think like that.
    bigyabai2 hours ago
    That's not a problem, though. You aren't owed attention for a theoretical idea, especially if you waste people's time with AI boilerplate text.
    Those ideas will almost always be ignored if the author neglects their due diligence to test the idea and document real-world results. Influencers like Jeff Geerling and Tom Scott would be (rightfully!) hated if they published their video ideas in the form of an AI-generated outline.