I don’t feel the need to. If someone says “this is AI” all I hear is, “I don’t want to actually engage with the argument”.

I also have a very specific voice. Blunt. Slightly irritated. Highly opinionated. AI is pretty bad at trying to emulate that well.

I don’t need to prove anything. First of all, if one thinks a piece of media is AI-generated they probably find them lacking in something else than just in style. AI or no AI, the content is what matters. Problem is that if in a conversation, education or say, art exhibition, you feel you have no meaningful input to share, it is very unlikely that the model you use will either. It will only answer your prompt and without your meaningful input, it will be just a bot saying platituded.

Other than that: 1) I typo a lot 2) I think I have my own voice in writing, which is recognisable 3) Likewise in art or music, even perhaps code

If your genuine human-made writing uses tyle guides that sprinkle em-dashes unnecessarily and uses forms such as ”Honestly? Blah bla blah.” the problem is not AI. Read Hemingway or Wilde or anything please.

It’s not possible. Eventually AI writing accusations will just be background noise. It’s one of the saddest things I’ve realized about a post-AI world.

[dead]