Ulysses being in the top three is a good example... I wonder how many of the people voting for it have read it.
This also happens in art, where people latch on to popular names so they can pop them out in conversations and every can nod and agree. Was Picasso really that great of an artist? or does he just have a name people recognize so people go with it. If Picasso's work was released on Instagram today, would anyone even look at it?
And back to the books, the same; these are are books people can safely say the names of and have everyone nod along and agree about how smart and cultured you are for knowing the correct names to say.
I really dislike these lists and those github repos of great software for xyz with 100s of links. what I want is 1-3 thing you really like and why.
> But all human life is here.
I think that's why I don't resonate with many of the titles. I do enjoy reading a vivid account of a person in a situation, but I prefer one that's not primarily people drama, and interacts with something large in an objective sort of way.
Books are weird to non-regular readers. I've thoroughly enjoyed almost every book I've read (except those assigned in school). Even reading books much longer than I'd ever expect to finish. I grew up on early sci-fi books from the public library, later reading Microserfs, Cryptonomicon, Diamond Age, Godel Escher Bach, Lord of the Rings. I also enjoy accounts of personalities in music, automotive, and math/science (based on my Youtube history). I can enjoy but feel cheated by stories which are just human drama with a sci-fi backdrop.