The best code review improvement I have done in my workflow with Claude is using tuicr (https://tuicr.dev).

It runs locally, YOU review all the code locally, and feedback that to Claude.

Agents reviewing AI code always felt dirty to me, especially when working on production (non-disposable) code.

> Runs against your regular Claude Code subscription (Max plan recommended) — unlike /ultrareview, which charges against your Extra Usage pool.

How expensive is it to run in your experience? In $ or tokens?

We seem to be fighting complexity with complexity. Does it really help?

Holy vibe coding batman this looks like a repository with just a bazillion prompts of which there are already a million.

Seems like it would create a lot of friction and burn a lot of tokens.

"I pay Claude, to use Claude, to write instructions for Claude, to review code from Claude"

Have we all just given up?

That's looks like a fair bit of ceremony for what it does. Is this representative of the output? https://github.com/adamjgmiller/adamsreview/pull/3

[dead]