109 pointsby bstrama7 hours ago37 comments
  • driggs5 hours ago
    This is fantastic. I couldn't find any obvious way to search for a new page, but you can simply bang out any arbitrary URL slug and the new article will be hallucinated fresh, eg:

    https://halupedia.com/shortest-cave-in-the-world

    https://halupedia.com/echolocation-ability-in-spiders

  • 19 minutes ago
    undefined
  • diputsmonro6 hours ago
    It's pretty fun to poke at! Although it's certainly difficult to be exact, it would be neat if generated pages used the context of the pages they were linked from (ideally, all pages that link to it) to guide the direction of the page. From the ones I generated it seemed they were mostly independent.
    • bstrama2 hours ago
      Update: Implemented it. All new articles work that way
    • bstrama6 hours ago
      Yeah, thought about that, maybe will implement it. Will keep in mind! For now SSR to feed LLMs' the priority
  • petercooper7 hours ago
    Give it a week and see what Google AI Overview has to say about the Great Pigeon Census of 1887!
    • aDyslecticCrowan hour ago
      google is already on it when asking about "The Great Pigeon Census of 1887"

      using 1886 or 1888 makes Google correctly identify that no such sensus exist.

      asking about 1887 specifically makes Google refer to some supposed great effort to track passenger pigeon population mids of the species decline.

    • stavros2 hours ago
      I made the same thing months ago, so you don't need to wait:

      https://encyclopedai.stavros.io

      • cachiusan hour ago
        There's another one! https://grokipedia.com/
        • stavrosan hour ago
          Ah yes, IIRC I got the idea to make mine to make fun of that one when I heard the name.
      • gojomo2 hours ago
        I searched your site for [Great Pigeon Census of 1887] and was only returned articles anout other things.
        • stavrosan hour ago
          • gojomoan hour ago
            As it didn't generate that when I typed the title i to your search box, was there a bug now fixed? Or did you use some other path not evident on the page you linked to generate it?
            • stavrosan hour ago
              There was a bug where scanning took too long with the thousands of articles in there, but I just fixed it.

              You can also just type a random URL and visit it, it'll generate an article. That's what I did before I fixed the search issue, and I usually just do that to avoid the search route.

          • Noumenon72an hour ago
            So by "I made the same thing months ago" you didn't mean "an article about the great pigeon census" (your link is created May 6) or "an encyclopedia of hallucinations" like the OP, but just "an encyclopedia with some articles AI wrote". What's the point?
            • stavrosan hour ago
              What's the difference between an encyclopedia that produces AI articles on demand and an encyclopedia that produces AI articles on demand?
  • n00bskoolbus2 hours ago
    One suggestion for improvement is avoiding creation of self referential links. For example https://halupedia.com/chaldic-arithmetic has many references links to itself.
  • cachiusan hour ago
  • jakub_g2 hours ago
    Reminded me of this old, pre-LLM git docs generator:

    https://git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net/

    • anthkan hour ago
      Plan 9/9front's bullshit(1) tool works kinda like these but without requiring an $6k machine.
  • bstrama5 hours ago
    UPDATE: Just now, comment section added. Have a nice time arguing!
    • dlcarrier5 hours ago
      You are a wonderful person.

      You not only made this excellent source of entertainment, you are also helped everyone find their unmatched socks, ensuring that "no individual would ever be forced to wear a mismatched pair". (Source: https://halupedia.com/humanitarian-accomplishments-of-the-on...

      • lxgr4 hours ago
        We should really host another one though; I think I've since lost a few more.
    • segh35 minutes ago
      I'm curious, what is the LLM cost of the website?
  • lxgr6 hours ago
    Ironically, this seems much faster (for pages already, erm, "researched") than the real one! How?
    • bstrama6 hours ago
      It generates articles only once. So once it's generated, it never perish. Logic looks like: If article exist -> show it If not -> generate and save
      • lxgr6 hours ago
        I get that, but how does it serve the generated and cached ones seemingly faster than Wikipedia? (My guess is that single-page applications, which this one seems to be, just need less round trips between navigations or something?)
        • bstrama2 hours ago
          Also now that I think, we store articles in decwntralized cloudflare KV store and access from serverless workers running also on their servers.

          That could be the thing behind it being so quick.

          Cloudflare workers have 1ms cold start.

          • lxgr2 hours ago
            Nice job, this is seriously one of the fastest websites I've ever used!

            I feel like I have some minimum latency "priced in" to my expectation when I click a link on a static site, so yours feels uncannily like it's somehow able to anticipate my clicks, adding to the surreal atmosphere.

        • bstrama5 hours ago
          Yep, just a react. Also we use gemini 2.5 flash lite, so it's fast, cheap and dumb.
          • lxgr4 hours ago
            Nice, that's what I used for by LLM-backed HTTP server [1] a while ago as well :) It's a shame they got rid of the generous free quota a while ago, which is why I had to shut my public instance down.

            [1] https://github.com/lxgr/vibeserver/

  • solarkraft6 hours ago
    Finally a more trustworthy version of Grokipedia!
    • bstrama6 hours ago
      It's hilarious, you made my day hahah
    • LeoPanthera6 hours ago
      I honestly forgot that Grokipedia existed. Did anyone ever use it?
      • bstrama6 hours ago
        Tried once, but was useless. Very funny that it had so many text, while Elon is apparently "huge" fan of short and precise communication...
      • mmooss5 hours ago
        Somebody showed me it appearing near the top of some of their DuckDuckGo queries.
  • JohnMakin6 hours ago
    Funny, but you could argue this is actively harmful to the web.
    • SwellJoe2 hours ago
      I wouldn't. And, I'd think less of anyone who does make that argument.

      Anyone of reasonable intelligence can easily tell this is a parody of an encyclopedia. Saying this is bad for the web is like saying The Onion is bad for the web.

      • Eisenstein2 hours ago
        What would you think of a person who said that they are already convinced that an opposing view could not be correct without even hearing the arguments for it?
    • anonymousiam5 hours ago
      It's probably only harmful to the AI scrapers that train from the web. Most people will understand the purpose of this -- to poison LLM training in a humorous way, which is really easy to do. It exemplifies a major weakness in modern day AI.
    • r3trohack3r6 hours ago
      Interesting, but you could argue comments like this are actively harmful to the web.
      • AlecSchueler5 hours ago
        But the argument wouldn't be nearly as strong.
        • dymk2 hours ago
          Hard to say when nobody is actually offering arguments
    • isoprophlex6 hours ago
      The sooner the current web dies, the better. Something better either rises from its ashes, or we lose... something that was already lost.
      • b00ty4breakfast6 hours ago
        or something way worse shows up.
        • JohnMakin5 hours ago
          Yea, I'm not sure how the "this is really bad so let's make it worse" argument really makes any sense
          • dylan604an hour ago
            When you get the something worse, the previous suddenly becomes much less worse. With the help of wrapping your memories with "remember when" nostalgia making things much more palatable, the something worse suddenly makes the previous better if not good.
          • znort_5 hours ago
            context. sometimes things simply have to be broken to give way for something better. ymmv.
            • b00ty4breakfast4 hours ago
              I think there's an unexamined assumption here that "the next thing" is always going to be an improvement but there is no, non-ideological reason to hold to this assumption. Ideally, we would be actively working towards making it so but what often happens is passively riding the current and calling it "progress".
    • dayofthedaleks6 hours ago
      You could also argue that the web has failed and poisoning it into irrelevance is a vital service, motivating humans to collect knowledge into immutable sources. We‘ll call them ‘libraries.’
    • gojomo2 hours ago
      A web that is vulnerable to this would already be as good as dead.

      As an entertaining way to highlight the importance of upgrading our ways of knowing, playful (& open-source!) projects like this are likely to strengthen the web.

    • lxgr6 hours ago
      On the other hand, one could argue that anything that can be destroyed by relatively clearly labeled satire, deserves to be.
    • stronglikedan6 hours ago
      > you could argue

      Could you? I don't see it happening, but I could be wrong.

    • wildzzz4 hours ago
      Any training data scraper that blindly takes stuff from websites deserves to have their model poisoned by this nonsense.
    • parliament326 hours ago
      To the web? It's fantastic for the web, these are the kinds of fun projects that make the web a worthwhile place to be. To slop generators? Yes, absolutely harmful, and that's for the best.
    • slig6 hours ago
      Grokipedia is already doing that.
    • Jtarii6 hours ago
      Pissing on a pile of shit
  • driggs5 hours ago
    This site is going to be expensive when a web crawler hits it. A honey pot that burns tokens.
  • rootusrootusan hour ago
    I wonder how long it will be before Canis dementialis becomes a standalone meme.
  • bstrama6 hours ago
    Can't wait to see the next generation of LLMs after feeding it all of that hahaha
    • everyos_6 hours ago
      The page requires JS to load its content - user agents without JS support just get a blank page.

      I'm not sure if the bots that scrape data to train LLMs are capable of loading that type of page, or if they only work on pages that have the content inside the HTML itself?

      • aDyslecticCrowan hour ago
        Not using JavaScript would also make the crawler fail on squarespace and wix website builders.

        The age where the web was usable at all without JavaScript is long gone. No scraper would get much scraping done without JavaScript these days.

      • replygirl6 hours ago
        any serious scraping service these days will fail over to a headless browser when it fetches an asset referencing a js bundle that isn't verifiably a vendor script
      • bstrama6 hours ago
        I'm aware and will implement SSR soon ;)
      • m30476 hours ago
        It's entirely possible they simply ingest the JS as-is.
  • nickvec6 hours ago
    Seeing “Something broke, which is ironic for a made-up encyclopedia: Load failed” when trying to access some of the suggested starting points
    • bstrama6 hours ago
      Works on my PC.

      Could you gimme the url that's failing?

  • pinkmuffinere2 hours ago
    I find the handling of NSFW topics (and how it avoids making them nsfw) really interesting. Eg https://halupedia.com/fuck (aside from the title it seems SFW to me)
    • bstrama2 hours ago
      Best part - I didn't implement such logic. It just for some reason works that way.
      • pinkmuffinere2 hours ago
        Huh that is interesting, I was expecting it to show some sort of error on generation, or something like that
  • throw3108225 hours ago
    Funny. Small improvement suggestion: the entry about "Glorbonian culinary arts" links to "the subterranean nation of Glorbonia". However upon clicking the link to "Glorbonia", an entry is generated claiming that "Glorbonia refers to a peculiar and largely uncatalogued form of sub-auditory resonance". It would be cool if some context were carried over from the referrer page so that there is some coherence between entries (ah, and some existing entries could be taken in account when generating new ones).
    • notahacker2 hours ago
      Feels like this will eventually cause collisions, although perhaps nothing multiple definitions of Glorbonia and multiple biographies of different Mrs Wiggles (perhaps with Wikipedia style disambiguation) can't solve
    • throw3108222 hours ago
      Btw, I've noticed just now that Glorbonia is, in the first entry, a "subterranean nation" and in the second it's a "sub-auditory resonance". So I got curious and I asked Opus what he thinks about the word Glorbonia: "Do you detect in the word a sense of place? North, south, east, west, up, down?". And Opus answers "Down, weirdly. Or maybe low — something subterranean, or at least sunken." Curious.
  • janwillemb6 hours ago
    It's nice, but after a few clicks my LLM content fatigue kicks in.
  • sofayam5 hours ago
    Currently breaks if you try to create a page with a Japanese slug. Multiple languages would make this an even more valuable resource than it already is.
  • meghneelgore6 hours ago
    Great idea! I created an adjacent website that gives, shall we say, "alternative facts" about your questions. (don't know if the rules allow me to link the site so I won't).
  • anthk2 hours ago
    https://halupedia.com/computer

    This is perfect. Very Neal Stephensony.

    Also, this, but with no AI: https://ifdb.org/viewgame?id=032krqe6bjn5au78

    Just incredible prose and writing (and gameplay), with something you can run with Frotz/NFrotz/LectRote or any ZMachine interpreter (or Glulxe like Gargoyle). A Pentium would run this and marvel you in a similar way.

    No need to waste tons of water in datacenters.

  • anthk2 hours ago
    This is what every LLM will converge into without curated human input.
  • arduanika6 hours ago
    Love it! It feels very Borges!

    Feature request: also be able to click on the Talk page to see the controversies. I don't always want to trust the article itself as the final word.

    Edit: Oh look, there's an article about the YC! https://halupedia.com/y-combinator

    • bstrama5 hours ago
      Just added comment section :)
    • bstrama6 hours ago
      Great suggestion! Will immediately look into that!
    • mmooss5 hours ago
      > Edit: Oh look, there's an article about the YC! https://halupedia.com/y-combinator

      This should be on YC's About page.

      • notahacker2 hours ago
        > Y Combinator might be responsible for the spontaneous generation of minor deities in areas experiencing extreme metaphysical gravity.

        This particular piece of slop is a serendipitously brilliant description of the cult of founder worship in the metaphysical gravity of Silicon Valley.

    • anthkan hour ago
      This kind of Absurdist humour reminds me of the Marx Brothers or the Tip y Coll Spaniards.

      And the Sokal case with the Humanities branches, for sure.

      BTW: https://halupedia.com/postmodernism

      This is golden.

      https://halupedia.com/paradox

      Best entry, hands down. This is a love letter to Prattchett.

  • gavmor5 hours ago
    Hm, the page generated seems inconsistent with the usage of the original link.
  • mmoossan hour ago
    As I said in another comment, this is brilliant. Suggestion: Remove anything that isn't part of the satire; act always as if it's a 'real' encyclopedia. For example on the front page I would remove,

    > Articles are generated on demand and stored permanently upon first request.

    Don't dispell the magic; don't pull back the curtain and let people see the mechanics.

    EDIT: As you say in your system prompt, "You never wink at the reader. You never acknowledge that anything is funny or fictional. Everything is reported as though it is completely normal and well-documented"

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042306

    • Noumenon72an hour ago
      This is irresponsible for people who don't get it, takes away confirmation for people who do get it, and makes me block/blacklist any liar who does it.
      • mmoossan hour ago
        It is indeed a problem for people who refuse to use their sense of humor.
  • adolfhitler027 minutes ago
    hello
  • dmje6 hours ago
    I LOVE IT. Superb.
  • jijilao5 hours ago
    wtf, I thought these were just anecdotes until I saw they were actually happening in Astoria. I used to visit in the summers and never heard about any of that! Stop the fake news
    • tukunjil5 hours ago
      All the world are going mad with artificial intelligence and LLMs. Just disgusting!
  • FergusArgyll6 hours ago
    Who says llms can't be funny?!
  • 6 hours ago
    undefined
  • __MatrixMan__21 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • staticshock2 hours ago
    [dead]
  • yodon5 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • gojomo2 hours ago
    [flagged]