28 pointsby bearseascape5 hours ago4 comments
  • cadamsdotcom3 hours ago
    Seems intuitively sound; a larger model would have the ability to differentiate among a larger variety of concepts, which translates to a larger vocabulary and greater ability to use expressive tools such as imagery, metaphor etc etc.

    I could go on, but brevity is virtuous.

  • pstuart3 hours ago
    It makes sense that flowery language is more decorative than functional, but I wonder how much nuance can help shape reckoning, reasoning, and rendering -- if at all.

    Maybe RFC terms are all that's needed: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119

    • Retrican hour ago
      Flowery language is a powerful tool, but it demands more from both the reader and writer.

      That’s the fundamental flaw in using simple heuristics to evaluate language, the exact same text can be useful or deeply flawed just based on the context. You need to make sacrifices the wider the intended audience.

  • refulgentisan hour ago
    [flagged]
  • JDazzle3 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • kennyadam3 hours ago
      Please don’t turn this place into reddit with a race to the bottom for postings puns or “jokes” that are little more than pointing out hollow pop culture associations to a word in the title of the submission. It’s already happening more and more, but maybe we could try to keep the level of discourse just slightly higher for just a bit longer, please?
      • drfloyd513 hours ago
        I put on my robe and wizard hat.
    • burnte3 hours ago
      Megatron goes on for hours. He really needs a system prompt.