Waymo Drives Off with South Bay Man's Luggage(sfist.com)
68 pointsby toss13 hours ago10 comments
  • krupanan hour ago
    The way this has apparently been handled saddens me. I worked for Cruise, a Waymo competitor. A Cruise vehicle famously had a very unfortunate accident and Cruise government relations employees famously tried to cover up the worst details when reporting it to the CA DMV. Of course the cover-up was discovered and guess what? Cruise lost their license and not long after lost all their funding and shut down.

    Self driving cars are a new technology that makes a lot of people nervous. For it to succeed those nerves need to be acknowledged and settled. This is life and death for the business and technology!

    Also, Waymo's customers (and really all of us sharing the road with them) are very much providing Waymo a huge service as early beta testers. They need to be treated extremely well right now. It is not the time for Waymo to be trying to keep things quiet, dismissing concerns, and making half assed restitution for problems. Again, This is life and death for the technology and your company, Waymo! Every bit as important as the engineering work you are doing. Please don't screw this up

    • BoorishBears25 minutes ago
      Waymo has been "scaling up".

      In the earliest days the lost and found was 7 days a week with highly permissive hours for a manned desk at the depot.

      Then one day it became weekdays-only, but with a still large window.

      Then one day the window for pick up got broken up into a few smaller windows throughout the day.

      Now with the larger Bay Area expansion they did switch to automated lockers, but if you're unfortunate enough in SF specifically, your belongings now end up in a locker an hour away from from the city...

    • toss129 minutes ago
      It is also literally insanely hostile for Waymo to respond like this.

      The parent company, Alphabet, is valued over four trillion dollars.

      The proper response would have been: "oh, terribly sorry for the inconvenience, we'll immediately turn it around, wait there".

      If that was somehow actually possible, the next response should have been: "Oh, sorry that is impossible because of [actual reason X], we are terribly sorry for the inconvenience, where are you going to be staying, we'll immediately pack and ship it all to you FedEx".

      Instead, they do this petty crap.

      I'm no lawyer, but as soon as someone takes off with my stuff, that sounds like theft. Sure, I willingly put it in the trunk, but it was on a contract that they would deliver me and my luggage to the destination. Refusing to allow me to retrieve it, then requiring me to come get it is just outrageous.

      At the very least, instead of offering the rider two rides to come fetch his stuff that they drove off with, would be to deliver it to his home at a time convenient to him.

      This tells me the company is run by a bunch of greedy losers. Not anyone with whom I might want to associate or do business.

      Really disappointing

      • throwup2389 minutes ago
        > I'm no lawyer, but as soon as someone takes off with my stuff, that sounds like theft. Sure, I willingly put it in the trunk, but it was on a contract that they would deliver me and my luggage to the destination. Refusing to allow me to retrieve it, then requiring me to come get it is just outrageous.

        You don't need the contract. The location of the item in question doesn't matter, it still belongs to the legal owner. It's a pain in the ass for a lot of people like landlords when tenants leave a bunch of crap at a property. Unless the state has specific laws covering that scenario as abandonment, they have to keep it a long time before its officially counted as abandoned and can be thrown out.

        The "requiring me to come get it is just outrageous" part however, isn't generally accounted for.

  • CaliforniaKarl3 hours ago
    I am surprised the trunk didn't open, and I’m very surprised that Waymo support could not turn the vehicle around. I’ve had a Waymo alert me when I left something in the back seat; I’m surprised it did not do the same for the trunk.

    I think the person should report this to either the California DMV or CPUC, as well as the local airport authority.

    For autonomous vehicles, I think people need to ‘normalize’ leaving one of the doors open until all people & cargo are out of the vehicle. The vehicle may complain, but it’s not going to drive off.

    • disillusioned3 hours ago
      Any time I've loaded something into the trunk of a Waymo, it pre-emptively pops the trunk when I'm getting out _for_ me and reminds me to get my things from the trunk, so this is... surprising as a failure mode. Wondering if there was some issue with the latch/opening system, because it's definitely programmed to work the right way. (Or he tossed his stuff into the trunk from the main cabin, but... it's a pretty low hatch ceiling there.)
      • zouhair17 minutes ago
        None of that is the problem, shit happen, the problem is them asking them to come get their stuff instead of apologizing and sending the luggage at their own expense with a free ride at a future time.
      • sparky_z35 minutes ago
        Not that surprising if the thing that failed was the thing that notices whether or not you put something in the trunk in the first place. Unless it does that routine at the end of every ride, regardless of whether it thinks something is in the trunk or not, then it's not a fail safe system and occasional mishaps like this should be expected at scale.
      • BoorishBears23 minutes ago
        Over hundreds rides I've found it's extremely flakey on if the trunk will open again at dropoff after opening it earlier.

        My guess would be the Jaguar's CAN bus being the weak link

    • gboss2 hours ago
      For what it’s worth, I always leave the door I exited out of open while removing luggage from the trunk. It’s just safer. Edit: from any uber or lyft
    • cheriot3 hours ago
      tbh, I do that with Uber/Lyft, too
    • ranger_danger3 hours ago
      What happens if one were to keep leaving doors open? I wonder if they would ban you or something.
      • cosmotic3 hours ago
        Wonder no more. They order doordashers to close the door.

        https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/12/waymo-is-paying-doordash-gig...

        • ranger_danger2 hours ago
          Interesting... I wonder if getting paid for closing the door still requires you to be active enough on the platform... otherwise I imagine you'd have people signing up for DoorDash just to stand in front of popular places and "hold the door open" for people... $10-20 a pop sounds like a good hustle.
          • lokar2 hours ago
            As a passenger, they probably silently black-list you if you do it to much
            • Buildstarted21 minutes ago
              I think the implication was that people stand around places where waymo goes often and just hold doors open for arriving waymo's to be "helpful". When the passenger leaves they just leave the door open for their doordash friends who are nearby
      • userbinator2 hours ago
        They would probably start to consider installing automatic doors if enough people do it.
        • jerlaman hour ago
          Pretty sure the next generation of Waymos, the Zeekr vans, have auto-closing doors.
  • cheriot3 hours ago
    Thank you, Sunnyvale man, for hitting this edge case before I do.
  • est312 hours ago
    This is a general fear for me whenever I take a taxi or something like it: i always remind the driver of my luggage in the back when we arrive and ask them whether they can help me get it.
  • bastawhiz2 hours ago
    This past week I took a Waymo and had difficulty exiting. It seemed like someone may have enabled the child locks. I'm overall very positive on the service, but this kind of issue needs to be addressed by the company.
  • 35 minutes ago
    undefined
  • plaidfujian hour ago
    They offered him two free hour-long rides to their facility and back just to pick up the suitcase? Waymo trouble than it’s worth
    • wrsan hour ago
      Why couldn’t they just stick the suitcase in a Waymo and send it to him?
  • justinclift3 hours ago
    (The sfist.com site seems to be extremely slow atm)

    https://web.archive.org/web/20260502234729/https://sfist.com...

  • geor9e2 hours ago
    You can prevent this by leaving the passenger door open until you've gotten the trunk open.
    • smilekzs12 minutes ago
      +1.

      Brought up in a low-trust env and this became habitual.

  • userbinator2 hours ago
    take two complementary rides to pick it up

    That seems... reasonable? They're not saying "come at your own expense" but giving him a ride there and back.

    • inerte2 hours ago
      If I steal your luggage, do you expect to be paid to get it or that I return to you?

      Waymo should have white-gloved this and sent Larry Page himself to deliver the luggage. This is horrible PR. Airlines will send you their luggage if misplaced. One day Waymo will drive-off with your toddler and ask you to file for adoption if you want them back.

      • thatguymikean hour ago
        Agreed - they dont even need to send an employee to do it, they can just send a driverless waymo with the luggage surely!
      • userbinatoran hour ago
        Airlines will send you their luggage if misplaced

        That's because airlines often have their own cargo/courier service which they can easily use for delivery; and everyone knows that even those lose packages at a nonzero rate.

        One day Waymo will drive-off with your toddler and ask you to file for adoption if you want them back.

        Your failed attempt at outrage sensationalism didn't help your argument.

        • jtbayly4 minutes ago
          > airlines often have their own cargo/courier service which they can easily use for delivery

          That is indeed convenient. But not quite as convenient as having your own self-driving cars you can use for delivery.

    • kiwijamoan hour ago
      Why can’t they just put back into a car in the back seat or whatever and send it off to him? Seems strange to make it so difficult when they surely have a vehicle sitting right there in their depot that could do the job as soon as the customer is back home.
      • userbinatoran hour ago
        What if they did that, and the car somehow arrives empty? They're going to be in even bigger trouble.
    • disillusioned2 hours ago
      It'd be nicer if they sent someone with his luggage TO HIM rather than making HIM take his time to go on a tour to the depot, though.
      • chihuahua23 minutes ago
        Imagine if the company had self-driving cars, they wouldn't even need "someone", they could just send one of those self-driving cars!
    • efs98an hour ago
      I'm genuinely curious how you think it's acceptable for a company to make a mistake and the burden the customer with resolving it.
    • krupanan hour ago
      How do we help you (and anyone else who thinks this is reasonable) to understand that it's absolutely not. Sure, it could be worse, but it also could be much better.
    • jcgrillo2 hours ago
      No, it doesn't. It used to be when the airline lost your bag they would get it to you no matter what. They own their mistake, and make it right to the best of their ability. In the most egregious case I can recall, delivering skis and poles 4hr+ from the airport into a remote mountain village ca. 2003. This is how you build trust in your brand--when you fuck up, you take ownership and make it right. You don't just shrug it off and throw a gift card on the floor like "take it or leave it idgaf".
      • charonn0an hour ago
        OTOH, a free trip to the depot and back is actually more than you'd get from a traditional taxi service under the same circumstances.
        • decimalenough43 minutes ago
          If this happened in a traditional taxi or even Uber, you'd call the driver or the company's dispatch line, and they'd send the cabbie back with your stuff. But it would also be mostly your own fault and you'd tip the driver for doing this.