81 pointsby wglb3 days ago6 comments
  • jrgd4 hours ago
    The few tests i ran i just got Granite4.1 tell me about YOLO repeatedly for no reasons; every questions and prompts were answered with a mention of a vision system unrelated with the task…
    • SequoiaHope3 hours ago
      I shudder to think of what IBM’s government based clients are using YOLO for.
      • jrgd13 minutes ago
        That thought now reminds me of the ibm accounting machines and their punch cards… Not a great perspective.
      • jrgd17 minutes ago
        Or trying to… given the performance of this release.

        I bet though internal tools are more efficient.

  • RickHull3 hours ago
    What is an enterprise workload?
    • Havoc2 hours ago
      Aside from this just being standard corporate speak copy, there is an element of truth there - the granite models are likely to give you more plain toneless responses rather than a rainbow of emojiis. Which in corporate setting can be useful
      • weird-eye-issue3 minutes ago
        Existing models from OpenAI etc never return emojis when using the raw APIs unless you ask for it
      • skiing_crawlingan hour ago
        That actually sounds nice in theory. A model for getting work done and nothing else, which doesn't have to account or be trained for any type of user engagement. Like how chatgpt/claude are wasting their capacity on social niceties and glazing the user. I don't know if granite is one such but I'd bet that many of the other popular models can't be since they are consumer facing.
    • swiftcoder2 hours ago
      OCR'ing tables into spreadsheets, apparently
    • hbbioan hour ago
      "This approach presents a significant opportunity for optimization and strategic realignment to better meet our core objectives."
  • wmf4 hours ago
  • 4 hours ago
    undefined
  • ekianjo5 hours ago
    The lmstudio link points to granite 4.0