32 pointsby geox5 hours ago3 comments
  • tristanj3 hours ago
    > The commission said children under 13 could use a fake birthdate to open a Facebook or Instagram account, with no checks on their self-declaration.

    How is what Meta did here any different than how 99% of other websites age-gate content? Why is Meta getting the harsh treatment?

    • nephihaha3 hours ago
      Because Meta is one of the main places that internet users have been herded to.
  • omglol0041 minutes ago
    Kids under 13 using Facebook is a real problem now? There's something fishy about this. Is this for lobbying and enforcing chat control and age verification?
    • subscribed17 minutes ago
      Yep, the same Meta is apparently bankrolling - on the OS level.
  • casey22 hours ago
    The EU can't think of anything better for the children of Europe than burning $300 billion on open sores?

    Investors and economists have gone crazy, chips and digital infra aren't worth anything, they just extract value from your population and make them dumber. While the western populace is buying debt fueled subscription services on credit, China is buying real estate, maintenance and robots with their trade surplus. Endless VC hype about robots in 2040, except there are here now. Not "here" they are in Chinese factories making cheap vehicles.

    • menno-sh2 hours ago
      > they just extract value from your population and make them dumber

      Hence not allowing children to fall victim to social media? I'm not quite sure I get your point.

    • watwut20 minutes ago
      > While the western populace is buying debt fueled subscription services on credit

      What are you on about in here?