1 pointby codesoda7 hours ago3 comments
  • arjun-mavonic6 hours ago
    Have you tried the plannatator? https://github.com/backnotprop/plannotator I've been using it for few months now and I like how it let's me annotate the plan as I review and then send feedback or approve.
    • codesoda22 minutes ago
      I hadn't seen that one. Looks great also.

      When I built this I specifically didn't want to have to provide feedback and then submit it back, then open again after the agent had considered my feedback.

      The way discuss is setup, it's interacting forwards and backwards on the discussion, from the web page, but within the original agent session I was having.

      Very convenient to ask a question "in the document" and get a response a few seconds later, in the same document.

  • karerckor5 hours ago
    Cool. Why CLI + skill files instead of an MCP server? Seems like you'd get the stdout events and agent integration as standard tool primitives.
    • codesoda15 minutes ago
      It's a bit of a bias of my own. It's all local, agents seem very good at running and monitoring cli outputs. They know how to follow standards, e.g. `cli-name help` to work out how to use it. The cli is self documenting this way, and they only need to learn about the commands they want to use.

      No reason MCP support couldn't be added.

  • mockbolt7 hours ago
    [dead]