119 pointsby lxst2 hours ago12 comments
  • hnuser123456an hour ago
    • throwa35626228 minutes ago
      That was a lot of CVEs

      Goes to show that not all security bugs are memory related bugs

    • LtWorf12 minutes ago
      I think this should be the real news.
  • teekertan hour ago
    It's nice as always, but I have some issues.

    * Select - Middle-click paste does not seem to work

    * When something requires a password (ie just tried a bitlocker volume) the whole screen is blocked, so no password manager for you (unless you copy it before, or cancel - unplug drive-copy password - replug drive - paste.)

    * The default tiling does not jive with me, sometimes I don't even know what it wants (it always tries to force you to also set a left windows if you tile right and vice versa) so I disabled it `gnome-extensions disable tiling-assistant@ubuntu.com`. Default Gnome tiling is ok (but missing quarter tiling (and 1/8th would be nice on my ultra-wide) imho so I use [0]

    * I've been trying to use Nix home-manager for packages but I have GPU errors, need workarounds, icons that just remain generic. But I guess that is not Ubuntu's fault.

    Ubuntu remains my nr. 2 choice, after NixOS (but I didn't get the latter to install on this Nuc, perhaps a bios update will help).

    The installer offered (under experimental) to run root on zfs, I didn't end up selecting it because only on the forth try (and by that time you're clicking at a fast rate just taking defaults) I understood that it would only download packages via wifi, not the cable (same for NixOS installer, so must be my network).

    [0] https://github.com/troyready/quarterwindows

    • WD-42an hour ago
      Select middle click not working is a stupid decision from GNOME to disable in 50. You can turn it back on with the tweak tool.
      • jl625 minutes ago
        Did they publish some rationale somewhere? It’s a useful feature.
      • Gigachadan hour ago
        Probably changed to work the same as macos. Not sure if windows does middle click paste.
        • NekkoDroidan hour ago
          > Not sure if windows does middle click paste.

          It doesn't. X was the only place I know of where that was a thing.

          • kleiba243 minutes ago
            ...and it's a great thing. Turning it off is another one of those GNOME decisions that are only made because the same feature does not exist in MacOS.
            • linmob18 minutes ago
              As a trackpoint user, I am glad it's off by default.

              Because of scrolling on Thinkpad keyboards (using the middle click), I had to turn that feature of every time, especially while working on longer documents I would otherwise accidentally paste stuff at random places.

              (It's not just macOS.)

              • hdgvhicv10 minutes ago
                I’ve used a thinkpad for 26 years, 18 with Ubuntu. I’ve always had middle click enabled.
            • NekkoDroid14 minutes ago
              I was never a fan of it. I always turned it off. And now it also freed up middle click for auto scrolling which is actually great, especially when the scrollwheel is somewhat broken.

              As someone that habitually highlights what they are reading it was generally beyond useless for me. It was actively making me mad when I accidenatally pasted some non-sense because I just highlighted a paragraph before and accidentally inserted it into something.

            • troupo15 minutes ago
              > only made because the same feature does not exist in MacOS.

              Or in anything that's not X?

              Speaking personally for me only, I don't think it's a great thing. The <however many> clipboards on Linux is... not really a great thing. I for one never know which of the buffers contain what. And this is compounded by the fact that selection may or may not overwrite what's in one of the buffers, and middle click may or may not paste whatever was in that buffer. Additionally compounded by how inconsistent the behavior is across apps.

      • Sol-13 minutes ago
        Jesus, do the people who work on GNOME even like Linux?
    • LtWorf10 minutes ago
      > * Select - Middle-click paste does not seem to work

      They did it on purpose for some reason. If I were you I'd give Plasma a try.

  • satvikpendem2 hours ago
    What should I use if I like Ubuntu but not snap, just Debian? Or are there alternatives around? Seems like Ubuntu has the best hardware and driver support so just curious what's new in Linux land.
    • jwralliean hour ago
      Now Debian is packaging non-free drivers in the iso images directly. I would suggest to try Debian first, if it works well for you just keep it.

      If you feel the need for newer packages, try other alternatives (or Debian unstable). I’ve set down on Fedora with XFCE, it’s really stable yet packages feel new.

    • flakeoil15 minutes ago
      I have a year ago switched from Ubuntu to Fedora and I like it. Clean and stable. Uses Flatpak. I'm using Fedora Workstation which is the default, but Fedora KDE Plasma seems to be nice as well if you want to have more configuration options available directly in the GUI. And the layout is more Windows like with start button menu etc for people coming from the Windows side.
    • dima55an hour ago
      Debian is great, and is where the distro development actually happens. What doesn't it do that you want?
      • ntoskrnl_exean hour ago
        I’m curious about proprietary Nvidia drivers. Ubuntu normally comes with fairly outdated, if not obsolete ones, but there’s a semi-official PPA with more recent versions. How does Debian handle this?
        • dima55an hour ago
          Debian has their own nvidia driver packages (it's nvidia's drivers repackaged in a nice way that integrates with the system well). I can't say if they're "outdated" or how different they are from what ubuntu ships, but they've always worked very well for me.
        • tormehan hour ago
          I think Pop does Nvidia well, but have no real experience with that.
    • notabotiswear42 minutes ago
      You can de-snap Ubuntu itself.

      Dunno about the this release, but till 24.4 it was simply a matter of removing some packages then holding/masking the primary snapd one, followed by manually adding the official PPAs for Mozilla’s stuff (or just use the Flatpak).

      Of course, there’s still the philosophical and long term issues with staying on a distro that’s promoting and continuosuly expanding the thing you dislike…

    • throwaway2056an hour ago
      Just install Ubuntu and remove snap. We are doing this for our University pool etc and encountered no issues.

      Make a list of all ppa before proceeding.

      What is your use case?

      • satvikpendem40 minutes ago
        The issue is them adding it back, sometimes even on apt upgrade, or silently installing it as a dependency for certain apps without mentioning it unless you look closely. That gets tiring after a while and I gave up on Ubuntu as even after having removed snap multiple times it always returned.
        • evdubs38 minutes ago
          This is my experience, too, and my solution has been to run Debian.
        • throwaway205639 minutes ago
          Never happened in the last several years.
      • evdubs38 minutes ago
        Doesn't snap come back on the next OS upgrade?

        I was using Ubuntu and installed the apt version of Firefox as the snap version would not open html files in locations like /var/tmp and would not work with USB devices. Every time I ran `do-release-upgrade`, all of that work would need to be redone. It was very annoying.

    • vanc_cefepimean hour ago
      I distro hopped for a while and settled on Linux mint. Uses flat packs. Hits the spot for easy to use and easy to maintain without needing to use terminal scripts to get things my way. Just my opinion.
    • troupo12 minutes ago
      Gaming-oriented distros like CachyOS and Bazzite might be what you want. I'm on Cachy and can recommend it. Because they try to "just work" without jumping through hoops.

      Even though I very much intenseley dislike the completely unintuitive idiosyncratic package management that Arch has. Which is further not helped by the fact that Cachy's default GUI for it isn't even integrated properly.

    • compounding_itan hour ago
      PopOS
      • satvikpendeman hour ago
        This looks like it might be the best solution, no snap, maintained by an actual system integrator and laptop maker, and I also like the new Rust-based desktop environment. I wonder how well it runs on Framework laptops or MacBooks as well.
        • compounding_itan hour ago
          Runs great on framework. Not sure about COSMIC on asahi.
    • manvel_hnan hour ago
      I hate snap as well. Use flatpak and KDE on Ubuntu. Never have been happier.
  • bashtoni2 hours ago
    Also green light for Fedora 44 release on 28 April

    https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproje...

  • compounding_itan hour ago
    Ubuntu LTS is still the choice for many production environments and education and learning. As someone with Ubuntu from 2010 CDs, I find it refreshing that modern Ubuntu distros work OOB on most computers these days with excellent driver support.
    • alprado5021 minutes ago
      Is this even true? I mean, Windows is the main focus for all hardware vendors, and everybody who has owned a PC knows that malfunctions are unavoidable. If that is the case for Windows, then Linux cant be better.
      • Joel_Mckay10 minutes ago
        Windows 11 set a low bar to clear... Most popular hardware will work on linux, but like always its better to check before your buy.

        Distro like Ubuntu are a fair compromise to get amd/nvidia GPU drivers, wifi, and brother laser printer/scanner networking installed. =3

        edit: seriously, why down vote the guys karma if its a honest question. Try to be kind people.

  • jklmnopqrstuvw19 minutes ago
    Ubuntu 26 + KDE Plasma 6.6 perfectly handles high-DPI scaling for me. I was originally planning to buy a Mac, but luckily I saw the news about Ubuntu 26 being released a few days ago.
  • azalemethan hour ago
    I know that the interim releases had issues with zfs and trying to update gave the message "Sorry, cannot upgrade this system to 25.04 right now System freezes have been observed on upgrades to 25.04 with ZFS enabled. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PluckyPuffin/ReleaseNotes for more information. "

    The release notes don't seem to mention zfs. I hope these issues have been fixed?

  • rs_rs_rs_rs_rs2 hours ago
    Hard to get some spotlight for this with all these new models around, I feel bad for Canonical.
  • superkuh2 hours ago
    The comments there note there is no official Ubuntu MATE release for the first time since Ubuntu 15 (and before 14.04 gnome2 was an option). That's a shame but probably most people who chose MATE (or gnome2) no longer chose Ubuntu due to the conflicting ideologies inherent in the two. MATE users generally don't like change for change's sake.
    • razingeden2 hours ago
      its in the daily builds. I haven't tried it yet.

      not sure if this confirms the impression you have there... I wasn't like this until a couple of headless VPS'es (on Arm8) got through the upgrade from 18.x -> 20.x -> 22.x and then crashed out over -> 24.x for a still unknown reason. now I'm just afraid .. or I should say reluctant ..to repeat that whole fiasco.

      https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-mate/daily-live/current/

      • Joel_Mckay18 minutes ago
        There were some issues with how the menu icon manager handled the new security policy defaults. This means the editor will break, and the displayed menu may be missing any item that didn't follow the naming convention syntax. Its a lot of packages to bring into compliance, for that one silly feature the devs had to put in before it was ready...

        Maybe they fixed it since the rc release, but there were some rough edges in Feb... the kernel USB support cooked the thumb drive partition structure.

        In 22.04 to 24.04 the kernel Nvidia GPU driver EOL abandonment began... In 26.04 people will discover most EOL hardware support prior to RTX series will be difficult to bring up.

        Probably wise to wait a few weeks for the bug reports to clear out a bit. =3

  • rasengan2 hours ago
    > TPM-backed full-disk encryption

    This is going to be very useful for servers hosted in third party DCs.

    • Davieyan hour ago
      Keeping the key in the same room as the padlock only protects against casual drive theft and secure disposal.

      Personally I'm more worried about someone stealing the entire server or a local threat actor.

      Sure, keep TPM to help with boot integrity, maybe even a factor for unlock, but things like Clevis+Tang (or Bitlock Network Unlock for our windows brethren) is essential in my opinion.

    • djkoolaidean hour ago
      The beta installer was completely unsuccessful in setting the TPM-backed disk encryption on both a ThinkPad X1 Carbon (Intel 258V) and a ThinkPad P14s (AMD 300-something). Hopefully they ironed that part out in the release, but it seems still early for this feature (at least for my comfort level).
      • nechucheloan hour ago
        Same on my Framework Desktop. Looks like it works only with a limited number of TPM chips for now.
    • Gigachadan hour ago
      I want this on my own homeserver. Protection against someone stealing the server without requiring me to type a password every boot.
      • zenoprax39 minutes ago
        In what way is TPM protecting your data if someone steals the entire server? TPM only ensures that the boot environment has not been modified. Whatever key is being used to automatically decrypt the disk would be in the clear.

        Unless I'm misunderstanding your situation, I think you should look up the "Evil Maid Attack" to better understand how to mitigate risk for your threat model.

    • senectus1an hour ago
      oh man i hope this works on dell laptops
  • throwa35626230 minutes ago
    I am thinking of testing one of those AMD Ryzen AI laptops for development and local LLM. These come with win11 copilot+.

    How well does 26.04 with the 7.0 kernel support these? Can it, say, use their GPU and NPU for compute out of the box?