They bill themselves as providing accurate predictions, but the accuracy of those predictions is predicated on incentivizing (financially) users with non public info to share it.
They should probably pick a lane- is it gambling or is it incentivized insider trading for public good (accurate predictions)?
ABCnews (13 points, 5 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47882789
justice.gov (1+75 points, 0+26 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883034 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883108
WSJ (5 points) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883150
> “Prediction markets are not a haven for using misappropriated confidential or classified information for personal gain,” Mr. Clayton said.
Hard to enforce that in practice, isn't it?