I tried it, the idea might be good for short chats and fast-moving discussions, since it avoids interrupting other people mid-thought. I feel it is only for very specific use cases.

I tried it but whats the value prop it offers compared to reddit or discord?

I love the technolgy, but adoption is going to be too blank canvas for most people. There's no good queues, organization, work flow, etc; no extant content to get into the flow, etc.

What you want to do is the same reddit did: sock puppets; but ethically sourced. Write a LLM routine that looks at a neutral source and starts using your product.

People generally dont know what to do when they can do anything.

Also, once you get active users, your get active trolls, so you'll need some kind of active or passive denial system. I think the most successful system is a lifetime $ subscription cost and a thorough banning of trolls. Either you make a lot of money on troll costs or you end up with a nice harmony.

Real-real time meaning other people see your message as you type it? This is a feature that would actually discourage me from using the chat. Having to control how your message looks while you're typing it is added stress for the writer and doesn't really give anything of value to the reader. Not sure why this is better than "traditional" chats.