7 pointsby Drakexor5 hours ago8 comments
  • wizeyone5 hours ago
    "AI-generated and approved by engineers" is doing a lot of work there. If accepting a 4-character Gemini autocomplete counts, Copilot users hit >90% last year. The useful metric is % of functions where >50% of the body was AI-written before human edits. just my 2 cents
  • rfarley044 hours ago
    I saw this post at the exact same time I ran across this elsewhere: https://www.phonearena.com/news/pixel-6-7-8-9-10-battery-dra...

    There's no way to definitively say they're cause and effect but also....

  • robomei5 hours ago
    There is a big difference between just “vibe coding” without reviewing the code and actually knowing what you’re doing and checking everything the AI produces.

    In my opinion, humans don’t really need to write code anymore. The main skill is steering AI models.

  • pbohun5 hours ago
    One possibility is that most of the code that matters is being written by hand, while enormous amounts of code are being generated for other things. People are being evaluated on their AI usage after all.
  • dlenski5 hours ago
    Title should have the word "its" rather than "it's"
  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • Drakexor5 hours ago
    Relevant section:

    "Today, 75% of all new code at Google is now AI-generated and approved by engineers, up from 50% last fall."

  • baCist5 hours ago
    Big tech is inflating the AI bubble. Because of that, I find it hard to fully trust these kinds of claims — especially from complex systems like Google.