110 pointsby hebelehubele6 hours ago11 comments
  • thot_experiment5 hours ago
    US support for Israel is one of the most horrible things imaginable, really makes me ashamed. It is only the US standing between the current horrendous status quo and Israel being an true international pariah state. Hopefully we cut off support and usher in a find out era.
    • thot_experiment5 hours ago
      (Though to be honest my position is probably that we need to go past cutting off support and US tax dollars should go toward reparations for Palesine, Lebanon and probably Iran and others, we are complicit in a lot of fucked shit.)

      ((I don't think those places are lead by great individuals and everything is amazing to be clear, I also think the people there have suffered immensely from a century of american, british and israeli meddling and we should be held accountable))

      • Allfodr5 hours ago
        "Opinions" like yours just show that the US is in a process of self destruction
        • tristanb5 hours ago
          Why?
          • Allfodr5 hours ago
            Because I don't think US tax money should go toward reparations for Palestine, Lebanon, Iran or anywhere else. We're not 'complicit' in the way you're framing it
            • thot_experiment4 hours ago
              The only reason Israel is able to commit the horrors they are is because they can fuck around without finding out due to US protection paid for by our tax dollars, we are absolutely complicit. Of course that's only in the immediate term, I urge you to look at the history of the region even a little critically, so much of the conflict there is rooted in British, American and Israeli meddling, it's an insane take to claim that we are not responsible and that we have not benefited immensely.
              • Allfodr4 hours ago
                No, money has nothing to do with it. The US military aid package to Israel is only around 2-3% of Israel's annual state budget. That's a relatively small amount, and far less significant than people tend to make it out to be.

                The US provides this aid because it serves American interests. A large portion of the money is actually spent in the US, benefiting the American defense industry, not just financially but also through technological development and shared innovation.

                What Israel truly gains from the relationship with the US is diplomatic cover, mainly the UN Security Council veto. Israel is by far the most condemned country at the UN in terms of resolutions passed against it, whether that's justified or not is a separate debate.

                • thot_experiment3 hours ago
                  I don't understand what the purpose of making a distinction between monetary support in terms of direct aid, and indirect aid. The entire apparatus of the US government is paid for by our taxes, we pay for it either way. We also pay for it in instability and negative sentiment.

                  > Israel is by far the most condemned country at the UN in terms of resolutions passed against it

                  It's crazy to me that you know this and yet it seems like you are still in support of the US protecting Israel? You still think this is a net win for the world? That's incomprehensible to me.

                  • Allfodr3 hours ago
                    > It's crazy to me that you know this and yet it seems like you are still in support of the US protecting Israel? You still think this is a net win for the world? That's incomprehensible to me.

                    It's crazy to me that you know the UN is literally run by states that actually commit war crimes, kill LGBTQ people, suppress women and minority rights, countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and you still think UN condemnation means anything. They're condemning the only democratic country in the entire Middle East, the one place in the region where these rights actually matter and mean something. Arab citizens can vote, gay people can live openly, women sit in parliament and serve in the military. That's Israel. And that's who they keep putting on trial.

                    Of course I fully support the aid for Israel.

    • anal_reactor5 hours ago
      To be honest the more I started getting interested in geopolitics the more I understood that the humanitarian ideals we preach simply don't work in real world.

      Iran is dangerously close to acquiring nuclear weapons. Nobody wants that because Iran is a dictatorship and in case of an already ongoing conflict dictatorships have a bias towards escalation - see how Russia is still fighting in Ukraine even though it's obvious that the whole operation has been a huge mistake. Either we stop Iran or we get a second North Korea - go to South Korea and ask how they feel about a nuke being pointed at Seoul at all times.

      Before Trump it was kind of taboo that US would just go to Iran and shoot them, hence the necessary existence of Israel that gives zero fucks and will shoot everyone who even thinks of threatening them. The deal was, US gives weapons to Israel, Israel shoots everyone that US doesn't like, Israel takes the moral blame but in exchange maintains its independence.

      The point is, being morally right means nothing if you die, therefore even good guys need someone to do the dirty job once in a while in order to survive against an opponent that is not playing by the same rules. Imagine a world where police have no guns and politely ask criminals to stop.

      And from the point of view of Israel - there is literally no good solution for the Palestine situation. If Palestine gets independence it's a matter of time before they declare war on Israel. Whether justified or not, the entire Arab world hates Israel just because they exist exactly where they do, and that's the reality Israelis live in.

      • cassianoleal4 hours ago
        • anal_reactor3 hours ago
          Ok now show me a nation that never in its history has committed any atrocities.
          • cassianoleal3 hours ago
            Why? I'm not the one separating nations between "good guys" and "bad guys".
            • omnimus3 hours ago
              You don't understand. The good guys are just giving preventive rocket medicine. The Palestinians and Iranians need it so they won't cause any atrocities. They should be grateful because if they got to live they could do something bad and then feel real bad about themselves.
      • thot_experiment4 hours ago
        I wonder if Iran being a dictatorship has a cause? Why does the Arab world hate Israel I wonder? Everything you're talking about is basically a direct result of UK, US and israeli bullshit in the area. It's people with exactly the same sort of colonial geopolitical ideas as you that CAUSED THE MESS IN THE FIRST PLACE.
        • anal_reactor3 hours ago
          When in doubt, blame the British. The British theorem: all life's problems can eventually be traced back to the British.
          • AlecSchueler21 minutes ago
            The largest empire in global history had influence on contemporary geopolitics. Why should we pretend otherwise?
          • thot_experiment3 hours ago
            They're almost certainly #1 global problem causers so it's usually the safest bet. Though I wouldn't be as expansive as you, the USA, Portugal, Spain and the USSR are no slouches. Can't be forgetting the Dutch either.
            • anal_reactor3 hours ago
              So basically all powerful countries cause problems for other countries. Not exactly a resolutionary thing. Don't forget China, Japan, Mongolia, Romans, all sorts of infighting between native American groups before Columbus. And I assume that Africa wasn't exactly a paradise even before colonialism.
        • spwa44 hours ago
          Strange how leftists keep blaming specific parties for messes, without critical thought. But no worries. Even within leftist thought, leftist ideals are responsible for the mess in Russia, in China, in North Korea, in Vietnam, in Cuba, ... and plenty of other places.

          So clearly, there is plenty of messes that leftism/progressivism is responsible for. So I can't help but ask: given that you blame the US for creating the Iranian situation, and hold them responsible. Do you reciprocate? What have you done to fix the messes your ideology, the ones you DO support, has created? Because either people should clean up their messes and leftists are responsible for stopping the Kremlin. OR people should not clear up their messes and what the US/Israel are doing is simply a good thing all around.

          Even in Iran. It was a leftist revolution that deposed the shah, with some allies of Khomeini, some leftist parties supported by the KGB. And whatever you blame the CIA for, I think we can all agree: Khomeini did far, far worse.

          Oh and before you say, "Khomeini is not a leftist", let me just say two things. First, he paid lip service. He has an entire book with a loooooooong rant about how every good property of socialism is really part of his "religious republic". Second he massacred socialists as soon as he came to power. And that is a communality in nearly every socialist revolution.

          So ... when will you sign up for Ukraine's army yet to stop one of the great many messes of leftist thought?

          Here's the webpage: https://www.ildu.com.ua/how-to-join/

          • thot_experiment4 hours ago
            What are you on about lmao, what is "leftist thought". My ideology? I'm not my ideology, my ideology is an ever shifting set of ideals I explore to try to build an internally consistent model for decision making. How in the world does a belief in US/UK meddling being the proximal cause for many of the modern issues in the region have anything to do with the crimes of the Kremlin. Can you please engage with the substance of my claims in any way? I'm not here to defend whatever "leftism" means to you.
          • koonsolo11 minutes ago
            So Russia invades Ukraine, and somehow you blame leftists for that? You must be buried deep in Russian propaganda.

            > when will you sign up for Ukraine's army

            There is only room in your brain for extreme thoughts? There is a lot of space between not supporting Ukraine and going to the front lines. For example donating money (I sure do as a center-right wing):

            https://savelife.in.ua/

  • sethammons12 minutes ago
    Sexual assault and violence is the biblical explanation for the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah according to more and more modern biblical scholars. The Christian's who hate the gays should instead direct their bible and politicians at Israeli soldiers and their government.
  • firefoxd5 hours ago
    The language in the article would be fascinating if it wasn't such a horrible thing.

    It's not that the Israeli soldiers are sexually assaulting Palestinians, instead they are using Sexual Assault.

    Later they say "Sexualised violence is used...", "men and boys were Targeted..."

    It's like there is a gun shooting people, or someone using a gun. But we can't connect fully understand how or who is perpetuating it.

    Edit: some more:

    "Israeli soldiers present during abuse had repeatedly failed to prevent it..." Who was abusing?

    • fwipsy5 hours ago
      I don't think the passive voice is meant to protect the perpetrators. Instead, they are presenting sexual assault as a deliberate tactic or policy, or at least a common pattern. If true, this is a much bigger story than isolated incidents of violence. But sixteen reported cases over three years seems very low. Likely there are more cases they missed. Mainly it seems like they have very little data.
      • appreciatorBus5 hours ago
        More likely, they already knew what they wanted to say, data or no data: Israel/US, bad: global revolution, good. They have to keep the pressure up so they need to write papers and get articles written about those papers and then get them posted on hacker news regardless of what actually happened. It’s a constant grind, but I suppose it will all be worth it for them if they get appointed on the committee of the vanguard or something like that.
    • woggy5 hours ago
      Look up the article in Ha'aretz recently "IDF Soldiers Talk About the 'Moral Injury' – and the Silence" for another example of this. I mean, I am glad they are talking about it, but the way it is framed is maddening.
    • ojbyrne5 hours ago
      The article starts with “Israeli soldiers and settlers” so presumably the answer to your question is settlers.
    • culi5 hours ago
      The settlers. They are there illegally and do illegal things but the soldiers are there to provide them with functional immunity
    • throw_a_grenade5 hours ago
      > Who was abusing?

      It's possible that in some cases it was settlers. So technically not soldiers. But soldiers protected them, incl. from any resisting abuse.

      • appreciatorBus5 hours ago
        [flagged]
        • 5 hours ago
          undefined
        • throw_a_grenade5 hours ago
          „There” — you mean where? Generally in the West Bank or intruding into Palestinian homes to abuse their children?

          I'd wager Palestinians would throw them out of their homes. Instead, parents had to stand there helpless.

          If you meant generally, I think they wouldn't be there without soldiers at all, illegaly tranfering own population into occupied territories.

        • woggy5 hours ago
          Is this a joke?
  • culi5 hours ago
    Nothing to say. Just absolutely maddening that this is what my taxes go to accomplish
  • totetsu5 hours ago
    I live in a country that while deeply perverted, is still not very sexually liberated day to day. And I also have many people in my social group that for reasons of cultural exchange have visited and lived in Israel. For someone who grew up in a country where it was normal to be writing essasy in high-school history class about the Balfour declaration, I'm was always amazed about how unaware they all seemed to be about the issues there. One thing I often hear from them is about more sex they were having or seeing around them In Israel. Or how it was much more directly part of the social life. And how much more things like other peoples play was visible in sex clubs or.. there was more "taboo" things taking place. I wonder what is going on in Israeli society that this kind of liberation exists side by side with these continuous reports of sexual violence in prisons, and now this.. What is the vibe line in a swingers club or on tinder if you're having to side eye someone wondering if they've be involved in that.. I have seen talk about rainbow washing, and homonationalism.. And its not like .. Israel is exactly publicly marketing itself as a bastion of sexual freedom .. but it seems to be part of people private conversations.. what do we call this.. eronationalism?
  • woggy5 hours ago
    If only hell was real.
    • Iridescent_5 hours ago
      Well it sure must seem real for Palestinians. And it's just called life on Earth.
  • gostsamo5 hours ago
    The christian supporters of Israel can also think a bit about the itf soldiers destroying a statue of Jesus in Lebanon if they want to understand what they are supporting. Useful idiots doesn't even start to describe it.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpd575n1znzo

    • siliconpotato5 hours ago
      Maybe they were carrying out exodus 20:4...

      It's ironic that netanyahu says that Christians are thriving in Israel and more than any other middle Eastern country. Only 2% of Israel identifies as Christian, whereas Lebanon has 37%, which Israel is bombing

    • omnimus5 hours ago
      Anything for Second Coming of Jesus
  • jamesfisher4 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • moinism5 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • gib4445 hours ago
      You only had to wait a few minutes
    • moinism4 hours ago
      and now its flagged :D
  • appreciatorBus5 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • woggy5 hours ago
      Straight from IDF soliders:

      One incident did leave a scar. It happened at an army outpost in southern Gaza. "I was sitting there in the command room," Maya says. "Suddenly, the soldiers on watch noticed five Palestinians crossing the line they weren't allowed to cross, heading for northern Gaza.

      "Everybody went crazy. There was a big mess. The battalion commander gave an order to overwhelm them with fire, even though they hadn't been confirmed as armed or anything like that. A tank started shooting at them with its machine gun. Hundreds of bullets."

      She says four of the five Palestinians were killed. "A few hours later, a D9 [Caterpillar armored bulldozer] buried them in the sand. When I asked why, they said that it was so the dogs wouldn't eat them and spread disease. The one who survived was put in a cage at the outpost, and they said we had to wait for a Shin Bet man to interrogate him."

      The Palestinian sat there, cuffed and blindfolded, and seemed to be freezing from the cold. "Suddenly, one of the soldiers took out his penis and started pissing on him. He told him, 'This is for Be'eri, you asshole, this is for Nova'"– Kibbutz Be'eri and the Nova music festival, two of the sites attacked by Hamas on October 7, 2023. "Nobody could stop laughing. I might have laughed too."

    • omnimus5 hours ago
      Just like you are not neutral. You can't just say that any article after October 7 exist just as persuasion - everything and everyone is against Israel? This automatically seems extremely suspicious to anyone with basic knowledge of how conflicts work.
  • Noumenon725 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • throw_a_grenade5 hours ago
      > Not clear whether soldiers are acting on their own or following policy.

      It mostly doesn't matter, unless they're punished. If they're not, then the policy is, what they did is okay. That's why it's important to keep army disciplined.