63 pointsby zorrn5 hours ago13 comments
  • davepeck4 hours ago
    This thread is pretty quiet for what strikes me as a substantial set of changes with, presumably, more substantial changes still to come for anyone not grandfathered into a Pro plan.

    I get the impression that the intersection of HN posters and Copilot users is quite small in practice; that Claude Code and Codex suck up all the oxygen in this room. But it seems plausible we’ll see similar “true costs greatly exceed our current subscription pricing” from Anthropic and OpenAI someday soon…

    • andromaton32 minutes ago
      The ux of copilot driving Claude beats Claude Code handily.

      I never understood the low visibility.

      Expensive ram is annoying. I don't look forward to expensive ai.

  • everfrustrated5 hours ago
    This is quite the rug pull.

    I've been using the Pro+ with Opus 4.6 very successfully and being charged 3x rate was mostly acceptable.

    But removing Opus 4.6 and replacing with Opus 4.7 with a 7x rate is just insane!

  • diath5 hours ago
    I guess it makes more sense for me to just get Claude Pro instead. I was using my Copilot license only because of Opus 4.6 access as all other models seemed crippled in comparison in Copilot; does not even make sense to upgrade to Pro+ which goes from $10/mo to $40/mo and only gives you access to a model that has 7x the rate - 5x the limit at 7x the rate for 4x the price does not seem appealing at all.
  • rectang3 hours ago
    Welp. I already added a $20 Claude Pro subscription to complement my $10 Github Copilot Pro subscription and $10 DuckDuckGo Plus. That was partly to show support for Anthropic after the OpenAI/DOD episode, but also because I've been using Opus 4.5 exclusively with Copilot and I figured I should try Claude Code eventually.

    Now it's going to cost me an upgrade to $39 Github Pro+ to keep using Opus, and even then it's with much higher multipliers. I don't fully understand the extent to which this reflects actual costs for Opus versus Microsoft leveraging network effects to discourage the usage of a competitor.

    I didn't really want to wander outside of VSCode just yet because I was happy with VSCode/Copilot/Opus-4.5 and I don't want to spend all my time experimenting when stuff is changing so fast. But I guess my hand has been forced.

    • diath3 hours ago
      > I didn't really want to wander outside of VSCode just yet because I was happy with VSCode/Copilot/Opus-4.5

      This was my first thought too but apparently you can just use Claude Code within VSC: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/vs-code

  • 34 minutes ago
    undefined
  • WhiteDawn5 hours ago
    I wouldn't mind this change that much if opus-4.7 worked properly in copilot cli. It keeps stopping mid-thought or task and forces me to waste more prompts for no observable reason.

    Looks like I'm ending my subscription, good (likely too good, no way my account was even remotely within profitable range) access to opus-4.6 was the only reason I used this at all.

  • p1necone26 minutes ago
    Damn it was good while it lasted, but it was obvious the previous per request pricing scheme was misaligned with their actual costs. MS's product people must be seriously detached from their technical and financial people for it to have even lasted this long (or they're willing to burn a lot of money for the typical "make customers happy and then rug pull" cycle, but hey, Hanlons razor).

    Given that they've already silently had session + weekly rate limits for the past couple weeks already at least (I've hit them), I wonder if this change is just making them visible to the user, or if it's actually tightening them too.

    If it's the former then I can say they're still significantly more generous than claude pro (on the pro+ plan), so this might be okay. If it's the latter, and the new limits are similar to claude pro then copilot is going to be significantly less useful to me.

  • aleksiy1234 hours ago
    I saw some Reddit rumours going around and locked myself into the yearly Pro+

    I guess overall probably was a good decision.

    But 7.5x as well as quota limits is pretty hard to swallow.

    The annoying thing about the quota limits is they make it really awkward to actually fully utilize the 1500 premium requests you are paying for.

    Like if you don’t plan working around the daily and weekly quotas you may not actually be able to utilize your full request allocation.

    Claude has the same issue. Single session blows through the quota.

  • walthamstow2 hours ago
    I'm not surprised at all. This was one of the most generous plans out there, offering frankly ridiculous pricing based on a single prompt regardless of turns taken or tokens used. I was subscribed for a month around Christmas and got a shitload of tokens out of Opus 4.5 for a measly $10.
  • hokkos2 hours ago
    I cannot understand people still using anthropic models on copilot, when gpt 5.4 is better and 3 to 7 time cheaper. Anthropic quite obviously raised their licensing to the max. You probably can still have a taste of it for a few minutes before being limited on their own subscription.
    • fkargan hour ago
      Simple, for what I'm doing Opus 4.6 (and before that, Opus 4.5) are just much better at following my instructions and achieve consistently better results.

      From what I've been gathering, this split in success seems to depend a lot on the types of tasks, the domains / programming languages / frameworks used, and style of prompting.

      I couldn't get 5.2 to follow instructions for the life of me, even when repeating multiple times to do / not do something. 5.3-codex was an improvement and 5.4 while _usually_ decent still regularly forgets, goes on unnecessary tangents, or otherwise repeatedly stops just to ask for continuation.

      Sure, I'm paying 3x more per request, but I'm also doing 5x fewer requests.

      Or well, used to. Still bummed about them dropping 4.6.

    • aleksiy12338 minutes ago
      Anecdotally, I experimented GPT-5.4 xhigh and something about the code it wrote just didn't vibe with me.

      It felt like I constantly have to go back and either fix things or I just didn't like the results. Like the forward momentum/progress on my projects overally wasn't there over time. Even with tho its cheaper it just doesn't feel worth it, to the point I start to feel negative emotions.

      I'm actually a bit worried that I've somehow become to feel more negative emotions with agentic coding. Quicker to feel frustrated somehow when things aren't working.

  • qaz_plm2 hours ago
    Worst part is them doing this mid-billing cycle and not at the start of the next in 11 days. I cancelled and requested a refund.
  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • 5 hours ago
    undefined