Optimizing Ruby Path Methods(byroot.github.io)
47 pointsby weaksauce5 hours ago4 comments
  • vidarh3 hours ago
    > More importantly, on CI systems it’s relatively common to check out code using git, and git doesn’t care about mtime

    git doesn't care about mtime, but git maintains trees whose hash changes if any constituent part of the tree changes. It'd seem tempting to check for a .git and if present use the git tree to determine whether to invalidate the cache.

    • byroot3 hours ago
      Aside from the oddness of making this cache git aware, with the new implementation I suspect querying git to revalidate the cache would take longer than just rebuilding it.
      • vidarh3 hours ago
        Looking up the hash of a tree in git is few enough operations that I would be very surprised if that is true for all but the smallest caches. If you were to shell out to the git binary, maybe.
  • somewhatrandom9an hour ago
    byroot sets a great example sharing his code optimization expertise. His blog has many great improvements like this. A 7x improvement in Dir.join and similar calls?! Thank you, byroot!
  • nixpulvis3 hours ago
    Would this be possible to mainline into ruby in some way?
    • vidarh3 hours ago
      From the article: "This new feature will be available in Ruby 4.1.0."
  • blinkbat3 hours ago
    don't take this the wrong way, but -- people still use ruby?
    • stackghosta few seconds ago
      I use Rails for many of my side projects. Because of the emphasis on convention over configuration, Rails codebases tend to be succinct with minimal boilerplate, which keeps context windows small. That in turn makes it great for agent-assisted work.

      Ruby is slow as fuck though, so there's a tradeoff there.

    • vidarh3 hours ago
      For pretty much everything. My terminal is in Ruby, with a Ruby font renderer, running Ruby shell, and my editor is in Ruby, my window manager, my file manager.

      (Yes, I'm taking it a bit far; my prototype Ruby compiler is self-hosting finally, so I guess sometime in the next 20 years I'll end up booting into a Ruby kernel for no good reason...)

      • simonask23 minutes ago
        I really like Ruby. It had a formative impact on my young programmer self, particularly the culture. So much joyful whimsy.

        But like... something like a font renderer in Ruby? The thing that is incredibly cache sensitive and gets run millions of times per day on a single machine? The by far slowest step of rendering any non-monospaced UI?

        The Earth is weeping my brother.

        • vidarh16 minutes ago
          It doesn't typically get run millions of times per day because in most regular uses it's trivial to cache the glyphs. I use it for my terminal, and it's not in the hot path at all for rendering, as its only run the first time any glyph is rendered at a new size. If you want to add hinting and ligatures etc., it complicates the caching, but I have no interest in that for my use, and then it turns out rendering TrueType fonts is really easy:

          https://github.com/vidarh/skrift

          (Note that this is a port of the C-based renderer libschrift; the Ruby version is smaller, but much less so than "usual" when converting C code - libscrift itself is very compact)

    • andreynering3 hours ago
      Ruby on Rails is the GOAT. Nothing comes close in joy and productivity, even in 2026.
    • flats2 hours ago
      Absolutely yes, all over the place! Startups are building greenfield software with Rails as we speak. Loads of established businesses have Ruby applications that are quietly chugging along doing their jobs well. & Shopify, a company with $1.6 billion in annual revenue, uses Ruby _very_ heavily & also invests in the wider Ruby ecosystem.

      Ruby is not without its drawbacks & drama, but it’s elegant in a way that few languages are to this day (how many JS programmers _actually_ grok prototype-based object-orientation?) & compared to NPM, RubyGems is (lately) unexciting in the best way.

    • nixpulvis3 hours ago
      People should. I seriously miss using it at my day job. It's not for code where type systems make things a lot more stable, but it's great for scripting and quick things. Also ORMs in ruby are truly nice, and I haven't found anything as good anywhere else.

      Generally speaking Ruby has the best APIs.

    • akerl_3 hours ago
      What’s the right way to take this?
    • x3n0ph3n32 hours ago
      It's my daily language and I don't even use rails nowadays.
      • vidarh10 minutes ago
        Same. I've used Rails a few times, but something like 95% of my Ruby use over the last 21 years has been non-Rails.
    • claudiug3 hours ago
      ruby and rails is the only stuff that keep me doing web development.

      when I touch js, and python... I prefer ONLY AI agentic style of working.

    • 3 hours ago
      undefined