23 pointsby wslh5 hours ago6 comments
  • neeeeeeal3 hours ago
    Kind of cuts against their argument that Claude is a supply chain risk. Brilliant move by Dario in allowing USG access to this - will make it difficult for the political hacks to argue about security risks at trial.
    • avaeran hour ago
      Not like we needed any more evidence that argument was political nonsense.
  • avaeran hour ago
    I wonder what kind of frightening new cyber weapons three letter orgs will develop with this. And who they will be used against.

    They say they're ensuring "guardrails", but to that I say lol as we wait for the next Snowden.

    • applfanboysbgonan hour ago
      I can't imagine there will ever be another Snowden. After seeing how whistleblowers are prosecuted by the government and villified by the public while literally nothing changes[1], who would throw their life away for that?

      [1] Actually, the situation has only gotten worse and worse.

  • yen2233 hours ago
    Are they no longer worried about the supply-chain threat that Anthropic poses?
  • wslh2 hours ago
    I imagine that you will need to use a giant budget for covering those codebases, and you can always run a longer and more expensive loop.
  • secretsatan3 hours ago
    Let’s hope mythos is all hype then
  • wajsG2 hours ago
    SOTA model will only kill 100 children instead of 160.
    • casey22 hours ago
      Cars killed way more children
      • ok_dad2 hours ago
        Solving “cars killing kids” is a lot harder than solving “dropping bombs on schools killing kids”. With the latter, we simply stop doing it. We can’t just stop using cars right away.
      • mandeepjan hour ago
        That line is suitable at X, not here!!

        While one was avoidable and unnecessary, and other can be improved!!

      • cindyllman hour ago
        [dead]
      • qahka2 hours ago
        Maybe the Geneva convention should be updated to allow more generous quotas of collateral damage then. /s